为什么AUKUS而不是AUKUS?这是Potluck,不是派对

IF 3.1 4区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Stephanie Carvin, T. Juneau
{"title":"为什么AUKUS而不是AUKUS?这是Potluck,不是派对","authors":"Stephanie Carvin, T. Juneau","doi":"10.1177/00207020231195109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In September 2021, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia announced a new security arrangement, dubbed AUKUS, focused on helping Australia acquire nuclear submarines. This caused anxiety in Canada, especially as it emerged that Canadian officials had been caught unaware. In this paper, we argue that AUKUS 1.0 (now increasingly referred to as the first pillar) is not a problem for Canada, despite this early concern: Canada may need to renew its aging submarine fleet, but it is unlikely to acquire nuclear submarines in the foreseeable future. That said, there are broader reasons for Canada to be worried: its exclusion from AUKUS is illustrative of its neglect of foreign, defence, and national security policy more generally. Moreover, as the pact evolves into AUKUS 2.0 (or the second pillar) and broadens its remit to cooperation on emerging defence technologies, Canada's absence from its proliferating working groups risks imposing serious costs.","PeriodicalId":46226,"journal":{"name":"International Journal","volume":"78 1","pages":"359 - 374"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why AUKUS and not CAUKUS? It's a Potluck, not a Party\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie Carvin, T. Juneau\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00207020231195109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In September 2021, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia announced a new security arrangement, dubbed AUKUS, focused on helping Australia acquire nuclear submarines. This caused anxiety in Canada, especially as it emerged that Canadian officials had been caught unaware. In this paper, we argue that AUKUS 1.0 (now increasingly referred to as the first pillar) is not a problem for Canada, despite this early concern: Canada may need to renew its aging submarine fleet, but it is unlikely to acquire nuclear submarines in the foreseeable future. That said, there are broader reasons for Canada to be worried: its exclusion from AUKUS is illustrative of its neglect of foreign, defence, and national security policy more generally. Moreover, as the pact evolves into AUKUS 2.0 (or the second pillar) and broadens its remit to cooperation on emerging defence technologies, Canada's absence from its proliferating working groups risks imposing serious costs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"359 - 374\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00207020231195109\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00207020231195109","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2021年9月,美国、英国和澳大利亚宣布了一项名为AUKUS的新安全安排,重点是帮助澳大利亚获得核潜艇。这在加拿大引起了焦虑,尤其是当加拿大官员对此毫不知情的时候。在本文中,我们认为AUKUS 1.0(现在越来越多地被称为第一支柱)对加拿大来说不是问题,尽管有这种早期的担忧:加拿大可能需要更新其老化的潜艇舰队,但在可预见的未来不太可能获得核潜艇。也就是说,加拿大有更广泛的理由感到担忧:它被排除在AUKUS之外,说明了它对外交、国防和国家安全政策的忽视。此外,随着该协议演变为AUKUS 2.0(或第二支柱),并将其职权范围扩大到新兴国防技术的合作,加拿大在其扩散工作组中的缺席可能会带来严重的成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why AUKUS and not CAUKUS? It's a Potluck, not a Party
In September 2021, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia announced a new security arrangement, dubbed AUKUS, focused on helping Australia acquire nuclear submarines. This caused anxiety in Canada, especially as it emerged that Canadian officials had been caught unaware. In this paper, we argue that AUKUS 1.0 (now increasingly referred to as the first pillar) is not a problem for Canada, despite this early concern: Canada may need to renew its aging submarine fleet, but it is unlikely to acquire nuclear submarines in the foreseeable future. That said, there are broader reasons for Canada to be worried: its exclusion from AUKUS is illustrative of its neglect of foreign, defence, and national security policy more generally. Moreover, as the pact evolves into AUKUS 2.0 (or the second pillar) and broadens its remit to cooperation on emerging defence technologies, Canada's absence from its proliferating working groups risks imposing serious costs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal
International Journal INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信