将人口健康战略纳入初级保健:对低收入成年人结果和医院使用的影响。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
H. Kitzman, Kristen Tecson, Abdullah Mamun, Briget da Graca, Samrat Yeramaneni, Kenneth Halloran, Donald Wesson
{"title":"将人口健康战略纳入初级保健:对低收入成年人结果和医院使用的影响。","authors":"H. Kitzman, Kristen Tecson, Abdullah Mamun, Briget da Graca, Samrat Yeramaneni, Kenneth Halloran, Donald Wesson","doi":"10.18865/ed.32.2.91","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective\nOur objectives were two-fold: 1) To evaluate the benefits of population health strategies focused on social determinants of health and integrated into the primary care medical home (PCMH) and 2) to determine how these strategies impact diabetes and cardiovascular disease outcomes among a low-income, primarily minority community. We also investigated associations between these outcomes and emergency department (ED) and inpatient (IP) use and costs.\n\n\nDesign\nRetrospective cohort.\n\n\nSetting\nCommunity-based PCMH: Baylor Scott & White Health and Wellness Center (BSW HWC).\n\n\nPatients/Participants\nAll patients who attended at least two primary care visits at BSW HWC within a 12-month time span from 2011-2015.\n\n\nMethods\nOutcomes for patients participating in PCMH only (PCMH) as compared to PCMH plus population health services (PCMH+PoPH) were compared using electronic health record data.\n\n\nMain Outcomes\nDiastolic and systolic blood pressure, hemoglobin A1c, ED visits and costs, and IP hospitalizations and costs were examined.\n\n\nResults\nFrom 2011-2015, 445 patients (age=46±12 years, 63% African American, 61% female, 69.5% uninsured) were included. Adjusted regression analyses indicated PCMH+PoPH had greater improvement in diabetes outcomes (prediabetes HbA1c= -.65[SE=.32], P=.04; diabetes HbA1c= -.74 [SE=.37], P<.05) and 37% lower ED costs than the PCMH group (P=.01). Worsening chronic disease risk factors was associated with 39% higher expected ED visits (P<.01), whereas improved chronic disease risk was associated with 32% fewer ED visits (P=.04).\n\n\nConclusions\nIntegrating population health services into the PCMH can improve chronic disease outcomes, and impact hospital utilization and cost in un- or under-insured populations.","PeriodicalId":50495,"journal":{"name":"Ethnicity & Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating Population Health Strategies into Primary Care: Impact on Outcomes and Hospital Use for Low-Income Adults.\",\"authors\":\"H. Kitzman, Kristen Tecson, Abdullah Mamun, Briget da Graca, Samrat Yeramaneni, Kenneth Halloran, Donald Wesson\",\"doi\":\"10.18865/ed.32.2.91\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective\\nOur objectives were two-fold: 1) To evaluate the benefits of population health strategies focused on social determinants of health and integrated into the primary care medical home (PCMH) and 2) to determine how these strategies impact diabetes and cardiovascular disease outcomes among a low-income, primarily minority community. We also investigated associations between these outcomes and emergency department (ED) and inpatient (IP) use and costs.\\n\\n\\nDesign\\nRetrospective cohort.\\n\\n\\nSetting\\nCommunity-based PCMH: Baylor Scott & White Health and Wellness Center (BSW HWC).\\n\\n\\nPatients/Participants\\nAll patients who attended at least two primary care visits at BSW HWC within a 12-month time span from 2011-2015.\\n\\n\\nMethods\\nOutcomes for patients participating in PCMH only (PCMH) as compared to PCMH plus population health services (PCMH+PoPH) were compared using electronic health record data.\\n\\n\\nMain Outcomes\\nDiastolic and systolic blood pressure, hemoglobin A1c, ED visits and costs, and IP hospitalizations and costs were examined.\\n\\n\\nResults\\nFrom 2011-2015, 445 patients (age=46±12 years, 63% African American, 61% female, 69.5% uninsured) were included. Adjusted regression analyses indicated PCMH+PoPH had greater improvement in diabetes outcomes (prediabetes HbA1c= -.65[SE=.32], P=.04; diabetes HbA1c= -.74 [SE=.37], P<.05) and 37% lower ED costs than the PCMH group (P=.01). Worsening chronic disease risk factors was associated with 39% higher expected ED visits (P<.01), whereas improved chronic disease risk was associated with 32% fewer ED visits (P=.04).\\n\\n\\nConclusions\\nIntegrating population health services into the PCMH can improve chronic disease outcomes, and impact hospital utilization and cost in un- or under-insured populations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethnicity & Disease\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethnicity & Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18865/ed.32.2.91\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnicity & Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18865/ed.32.2.91","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我们的目标有两个:1)评估关注健康的社会决定因素并将其纳入初级保健医疗之家(PCMH)的人口健康策略的效益;2)确定这些策略如何影响低收入、主要是少数民族社区的糖尿病和心血管疾病结局。我们还调查了这些结果与急诊科(ED)和住院病人(IP)使用和费用之间的关系。DesignRetrospective队列。以社区为基础的PCMH:贝勒斯科特和怀特健康和保健中心(BSW HWC)。患者/参与者2011-2015年12个月内至少两次在BSW HWC进行初级保健访问的所有患者。方法采用电子健康记录数据对仅参加PCMH (PCMH)与PCMH加人口健康服务(PCMH+PoPH)患者的结果进行比较。主要结果:检查了舒张压和收缩压、血红蛋白A1c、ED就诊次数和费用、IP住院次数和费用。结果2011-2015年共纳入445例患者(年龄46±12岁,63%为非裔美国人,61%为女性,69.5%未参保)。调整后的回归分析表明,PCMH+PoPH对糖尿病结局有更大的改善(糖尿病前期HbA1c= - 0.65 [SE=。32], P = .04点;糖尿病HbA1c= -。74 (SE =。[37], P< 0.05), ED费用比PCMH组低37% (P= 0.01)。慢性疾病危险因素恶化与预期ED就诊增加39%相关(P< 0.01),而慢性疾病风险改善与预期ED就诊减少32%相关(P= 0.04)。结论将人口健康服务纳入PCMH可改善慢性病转归,并影响未参保或参保不足人群的医院使用率和费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Integrating Population Health Strategies into Primary Care: Impact on Outcomes and Hospital Use for Low-Income Adults.
Objective Our objectives were two-fold: 1) To evaluate the benefits of population health strategies focused on social determinants of health and integrated into the primary care medical home (PCMH) and 2) to determine how these strategies impact diabetes and cardiovascular disease outcomes among a low-income, primarily minority community. We also investigated associations between these outcomes and emergency department (ED) and inpatient (IP) use and costs. Design Retrospective cohort. Setting Community-based PCMH: Baylor Scott & White Health and Wellness Center (BSW HWC). Patients/Participants All patients who attended at least two primary care visits at BSW HWC within a 12-month time span from 2011-2015. Methods Outcomes for patients participating in PCMH only (PCMH) as compared to PCMH plus population health services (PCMH+PoPH) were compared using electronic health record data. Main Outcomes Diastolic and systolic blood pressure, hemoglobin A1c, ED visits and costs, and IP hospitalizations and costs were examined. Results From 2011-2015, 445 patients (age=46±12 years, 63% African American, 61% female, 69.5% uninsured) were included. Adjusted regression analyses indicated PCMH+PoPH had greater improvement in diabetes outcomes (prediabetes HbA1c= -.65[SE=.32], P=.04; diabetes HbA1c= -.74 [SE=.37], P<.05) and 37% lower ED costs than the PCMH group (P=.01). Worsening chronic disease risk factors was associated with 39% higher expected ED visits (P<.01), whereas improved chronic disease risk was associated with 32% fewer ED visits (P=.04). Conclusions Integrating population health services into the PCMH can improve chronic disease outcomes, and impact hospital utilization and cost in un- or under-insured populations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ethnicity & Disease
Ethnicity & Disease 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ethnicity & Disease is an international journal that exclusively publishes information on the causal and associative relationships in the etiology of common illnesses through the study of ethnic patterns of disease. Topics focus on: ethnic differentials in disease rates;impact of migration on health status; social and ethnic factors related to health care access and health; and metabolic epidemiology. A major priority of the journal is to provide a forum for exchange between the United States and the developing countries of Europe, Africa, Asia, and Latin America.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信