作为父母心理控制方面的侵入性和情绪操纵:文化和发展敏感的再概念化

IF 4.4 2区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL

Human Development Pub Date : 2023-04-04 DOI:10.1159/000530493

S. Choe, B. Laursen, Charissa S. L. Cheah, L. Lengua, S. Schoppe-Sullivan, D. Bagner

{"title":"作为父母心理控制方面的侵入性和情绪操纵:文化和发展敏感的再概念化","authors":"S. Choe, B. Laursen, Charissa S. L. Cheah, L. Lengua, S. Schoppe-Sullivan, D. Bagner","doi":"10.1159/000530493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over 750 studies have examined parental psychological control (PPC) in different cultures. However, the conceptualization of PPC remains unclear, and operationalizations of PPC have been inconsistent. Herein we review and refine conceptual models of PPC, focusing on intrusiveness and emotional manipulation as two core facets of PPC. Guided by the Social Domain Theory, we relate intrusiveness to the boundaries of the child’s personal domain, which can vary by culture and age group. We describe how our conceptual model of PPC can clarify the disagreement in the literature about whether PPC may be arguably less damaging in interdependent cultures than it is in independent cultures or not; operationalizing PPC as mainly emotional manipulation – inducing guilt – might have contributed to this argument, and testing PPC with both intrusiveness and emotional manipulation can show both universal and culture-specific consequences of PPC. We conclude with recommendations for applying our conceptual model in future studies.","PeriodicalId":47837,"journal":{"name":"Human Development","volume":"67 1","pages":"69 - 87"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intrusiveness and Emotional Manipulation as Facets of Parental Psychological Control: A Culturally and Developmentally Sensitive Reconceptualization\",\"authors\":\"S. Choe, B. Laursen, Charissa S. L. Cheah, L. Lengua, S. Schoppe-Sullivan, D. Bagner\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000530493\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Over 750 studies have examined parental psychological control (PPC) in different cultures. However, the conceptualization of PPC remains unclear, and operationalizations of PPC have been inconsistent. Herein we review and refine conceptual models of PPC, focusing on intrusiveness and emotional manipulation as two core facets of PPC. Guided by the Social Domain Theory, we relate intrusiveness to the boundaries of the child’s personal domain, which can vary by culture and age group. We describe how our conceptual model of PPC can clarify the disagreement in the literature about whether PPC may be arguably less damaging in interdependent cultures than it is in independent cultures or not; operationalizing PPC as mainly emotional manipulation – inducing guilt – might have contributed to this argument, and testing PPC with both intrusiveness and emotional manipulation can show both universal and culture-specific consequences of PPC. We conclude with recommendations for applying our conceptual model in future studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Development\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"69 - 87\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000530493\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000530493","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

超过750项研究调查了不同文化中父母的心理控制(PPC)。然而，PPC的概念仍然不清楚，并且PPC的操作一直不一致。在此，我们回顾并完善了PPC的概念模型，重点关注了侵入性和情绪操纵作为PPC的两个核心方面。在社会领域理论的指导下，我们将侵入性与儿童个人领域的界限联系起来，这可能因文化和年龄组而异。我们描述了我们的PPC概念模型如何澄清文献中关于PPC在相互依赖的文化中是否可能比在独立的文化中破坏性更小的分歧;将PPC作为主要的情绪操纵——诱发内疚——可能促成了这一论点，并且在侵入性和情绪操纵两种情况下测试PPC可以显示PPC的普遍和特定文化后果。最后，我们提出了在未来研究中应用我们的概念模型的建议。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Intrusiveness and Emotional Manipulation as Facets of Parental Psychological Control: A Culturally and Developmentally Sensitive Reconceptualization

Over 750 studies have examined parental psychological control (PPC) in different cultures. However, the conceptualization of PPC remains unclear, and operationalizations of PPC have been inconsistent. Herein we review and refine conceptual models of PPC, focusing on intrusiveness and emotional manipulation as two core facets of PPC. Guided by the Social Domain Theory, we relate intrusiveness to the boundaries of the child’s personal domain, which can vary by culture and age group. We describe how our conceptual model of PPC can clarify the disagreement in the literature about whether PPC may be arguably less damaging in interdependent cultures than it is in independent cultures or not; operationalizing PPC as mainly emotional manipulation – inducing guilt – might have contributed to this argument, and testing PPC with both intrusiveness and emotional manipulation can show both universal and culture-specific consequences of PPC. We conclude with recommendations for applying our conceptual model in future studies.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Human Development PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-

CiteScore

6.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Distinguished by its international recognition since 1958, "Human Development" publishes in-depth conceptual articles, commentaries, and essay book reviews that advance our understanding of developmental phenomena. Contributions serve to raise theoretical issues, flesh out interesting and potentially powerful ideas, and differentiate key constructs. Contributions are welcomed from varied disciplines, including anthropology, biology, education, history, philosophy, psychology, and sociology.