肺优化治疗(LOT)与最大强度投影(MIP)在早期肺癌放射外科治疗中的4维CT扫描内靶体积(ITV)比较

D. Dutta
{"title":"肺优化治疗(LOT)与最大强度投影(MIP)在早期肺癌放射外科治疗中的4维CT扫描内靶体积(ITV)比较","authors":"D. Dutta","doi":"10.37191/mapsci-2582-4937-1(1)-004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Comparison ofinternal target volume (ITV) generated with lung optimization treatment (LOT) and 4-dimenstional computed tomography (4D-CT) measured maximum intensity projection (MIP) methods in lung tumour treatment. \n\nMaterials and Methods: 18 patients with lung cancer (n=8, stage T1A: 2, Stage T2: 6 pt, mean GTV 12.6 cc) and lung metastasis (n=10) accrued. 13/18 (72%) had right sided tumour, 12/18 (66%) had upper lobe tumour and 11 (61%) had 2-views on LOT. CT simulation (inhale and exhale phase) done for LOT based ITV generation (ITV-L). Same patient cohort underwent ITV generation with 4D-CT measured MIP methods (ITV-M). Comparison was done between the ITV in these two different methods. \n\nResults: Mean GTV was 12.6cc, ITV-L and ITV-M was 29.1 and 57.6 cc. Mean GTV, ITV-L and ITV-M in 1-view, 2-view, right lung, left lung, upper lobe, middle, lower lobe and primary lung cancer and lung metastasis were 3.2, 18.5,13.4, 10.7, 16.5, 6.3, 3.6, 25.5, 2.4 cc; 15.1, 38.1, 30.6, 25.1, 35.9, 19.7, 11.3, 49.9, 12.4 and 24.1, 79.1, 49.2, 79.8, 73.7, 34.1, 17.2, 106.4, 18.7 cc respectively. In 1-view and 2-view, ITV-L and ITV-M were 29.1, 57.6 (p-value: 0.001) and 38.1, 79.1 (p-value-0.009) respectively. Right lung tumour ITV-L and ITV-M were 30.6, 49.2 (p-value-0.001) and in left lung tumours 25.1 and 79.8 cc (p-value- 0.0.14) respectively. In upper, middle and lower lobe tumour, ITVs were 35.9, 73.7 (p-value-0.004); 19.7, 34.1 (p-value-0.474) and 11.3, 17.2 (p-value-0.001) respectively. In primary lung tumour and metastasis disease, ITVs were 49.9, 106.4 (p-value-0.071) and 12.4, 18.7 (p-value-0.001). Increase in mean ITV volume with MIP in all patient cohort was 49% [(ITV-M - ITV-L)x100 / ITV-M], in 1-view cohort 37%, 2-view 52%, right lung 38%, left lung 68.5%, upper lobe lung 51%, middle lobe 42%, lower lobe 34%, primary lung cancer 53% and metastatic lung cancer 34% respectively.\n\nConclusions: MIP generated ITV volumes are significantly larger compared to LOT generated volume. ITV-M is larger in relation to lobes, side of tumour and type of tumour. There may be higher lung tissue necrosis when treated with ITV-M, as the 'high dose' volumes are more in this patient cohort.","PeriodicalId":87293,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomedical and allied research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Internal Target Volume (ITV) Generated with Lung Optimization Treatment (LOT) and Maximum Intensity Projection (MIP) by 4-Dimensional CT scan in Radiosurgery Treatment of Early Lung Cancer\",\"authors\":\"D. Dutta\",\"doi\":\"10.37191/mapsci-2582-4937-1(1)-004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Comparison ofinternal target volume (ITV) generated with lung optimization treatment (LOT) and 4-dimenstional computed tomography (4D-CT) measured maximum intensity projection (MIP) methods in lung tumour treatment. \\n\\nMaterials and Methods: 18 patients with lung cancer (n=8, stage T1A: 2, Stage T2: 6 pt, mean GTV 12.6 cc) and lung metastasis (n=10) accrued. 13/18 (72%) had right sided tumour, 12/18 (66%) had upper lobe tumour and 11 (61%) had 2-views on LOT. CT simulation (inhale and exhale phase) done for LOT based ITV generation (ITV-L). Same patient cohort underwent ITV generation with 4D-CT measured MIP methods (ITV-M). Comparison was done between the ITV in these two different methods. \\n\\nResults: Mean GTV was 12.6cc, ITV-L and ITV-M was 29.1 and 57.6 cc. Mean GTV, ITV-L and ITV-M in 1-view, 2-view, right lung, left lung, upper lobe, middle, lower lobe and primary lung cancer and lung metastasis were 3.2, 18.5,13.4, 10.7, 16.5, 6.3, 3.6, 25.5, 2.4 cc; 15.1, 38.1, 30.6, 25.1, 35.9, 19.7, 11.3, 49.9, 12.4 and 24.1, 79.1, 49.2, 79.8, 73.7, 34.1, 17.2, 106.4, 18.7 cc respectively. In 1-view and 2-view, ITV-L and ITV-M were 29.1, 57.6 (p-value: 0.001) and 38.1, 79.1 (p-value-0.009) respectively. Right lung tumour ITV-L and ITV-M were 30.6, 49.2 (p-value-0.001) and in left lung tumours 25.1 and 79.8 cc (p-value- 0.0.14) respectively. In upper, middle and lower lobe tumour, ITVs were 35.9, 73.7 (p-value-0.004); 19.7, 34.1 (p-value-0.474) and 11.3, 17.2 (p-value-0.001) respectively. In primary lung tumour and metastasis disease, ITVs were 49.9, 106.4 (p-value-0.071) and 12.4, 18.7 (p-value-0.001). Increase in mean ITV volume with MIP in all patient cohort was 49% [(ITV-M - ITV-L)x100 / ITV-M], in 1-view cohort 37%, 2-view 52%, right lung 38%, left lung 68.5%, upper lobe lung 51%, middle lobe 42%, lower lobe 34%, primary lung cancer 53% and metastatic lung cancer 34% respectively.\\n\\nConclusions: MIP generated ITV volumes are significantly larger compared to LOT generated volume. ITV-M is larger in relation to lobes, side of tumour and type of tumour. There may be higher lung tissue necrosis when treated with ITV-M, as the 'high dose' volumes are more in this patient cohort.\",\"PeriodicalId\":87293,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of biomedical and allied research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of biomedical and allied research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37191/mapsci-2582-4937-1(1)-004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomedical and allied research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37191/mapsci-2582-4937-1(1)-004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:肺部优化治疗(LOT)和4次扫描计算机断层扫描(4D-CT)测量最大强度投影(MIP)方法在肺部肿瘤治疗中产生的内部靶体积(ITV)的比较。材料与方法:18例癌症合并肺转移患者(n=8,T1A:2期,T2:6pt,平均GTV 12.6cc)。13/18(72%)患有右侧肿瘤,12/18(66%)患有上叶肿瘤,11(61%)对LOT有2种看法。基于LOT的ITV生成(ITV-L)的CT模拟(吸气和呼气阶段)。同一患者队列采用4D-CT测量MIP方法(ITV-M)进行ITV生成。ITV采用这两种不同的方法进行了比较。结果:平均GTV为12.6cc,ITV-L和ITV-M分别为29.1和57.6cc。1、2、右肺、左肺、上叶、中叶、下叶和原发性癌症和肺转移的平均GTV、ITV-L、ITV-M为3.2、18.5、13.4、10.7、16.5、6.3、3.6、25.5和2.4cc;15.1、38.1、30.6、25.1、35.9、19.7、11.3、49.9、12.4和24.1、79.1、49.2、79.8、73.7、34.1、17.2、106.4、18.7立方厘米。在1视图和2视图中,ITV-L和ITV-M分别为29.1、57.6(p值:0.001)和38.1、79.1(p值-0.009)。右肺肿瘤ITV-L和ITV-M分别为30.6、49.2(p值-0.001)和左肺肿瘤分别为25.1和79.8cc(p值-1.0.14)。在上、中、下叶肿瘤中,ITV分别为35.9、73.7(p值-0.004);19.734.1(p值-0.474)和11.317.2(p值-0.001)。在原发性肺部肿瘤和转移性疾病中,ITV分别为49.9、106.4(p值-0.071)和12.4、18.7(p值=0.001)。所有患者队列中MIP的平均ITV体积增加为49%[(ITV-M-ITV-L)x100/ITV-M],在1视图队列中为37%,2视图队列为52%,右肺38%,左肺68.5%,上肺叶51%,中肺叶42%,下肺叶34%,原发性癌症53%,转移性癌症34%。结论:MIP产生的ITV体积明显大于LOT产生的体积。ITV-M在肺叶、肿瘤侧面和肿瘤类型方面较大。ITV-M治疗时可能会出现更高的肺组织坏死,因为该患者队列中的“高剂量”体积更多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Internal Target Volume (ITV) Generated with Lung Optimization Treatment (LOT) and Maximum Intensity Projection (MIP) by 4-Dimensional CT scan in Radiosurgery Treatment of Early Lung Cancer
Background: Comparison ofinternal target volume (ITV) generated with lung optimization treatment (LOT) and 4-dimenstional computed tomography (4D-CT) measured maximum intensity projection (MIP) methods in lung tumour treatment. Materials and Methods: 18 patients with lung cancer (n=8, stage T1A: 2, Stage T2: 6 pt, mean GTV 12.6 cc) and lung metastasis (n=10) accrued. 13/18 (72%) had right sided tumour, 12/18 (66%) had upper lobe tumour and 11 (61%) had 2-views on LOT. CT simulation (inhale and exhale phase) done for LOT based ITV generation (ITV-L). Same patient cohort underwent ITV generation with 4D-CT measured MIP methods (ITV-M). Comparison was done between the ITV in these two different methods. Results: Mean GTV was 12.6cc, ITV-L and ITV-M was 29.1 and 57.6 cc. Mean GTV, ITV-L and ITV-M in 1-view, 2-view, right lung, left lung, upper lobe, middle, lower lobe and primary lung cancer and lung metastasis were 3.2, 18.5,13.4, 10.7, 16.5, 6.3, 3.6, 25.5, 2.4 cc; 15.1, 38.1, 30.6, 25.1, 35.9, 19.7, 11.3, 49.9, 12.4 and 24.1, 79.1, 49.2, 79.8, 73.7, 34.1, 17.2, 106.4, 18.7 cc respectively. In 1-view and 2-view, ITV-L and ITV-M were 29.1, 57.6 (p-value: 0.001) and 38.1, 79.1 (p-value-0.009) respectively. Right lung tumour ITV-L and ITV-M were 30.6, 49.2 (p-value-0.001) and in left lung tumours 25.1 and 79.8 cc (p-value- 0.0.14) respectively. In upper, middle and lower lobe tumour, ITVs were 35.9, 73.7 (p-value-0.004); 19.7, 34.1 (p-value-0.474) and 11.3, 17.2 (p-value-0.001) respectively. In primary lung tumour and metastasis disease, ITVs were 49.9, 106.4 (p-value-0.071) and 12.4, 18.7 (p-value-0.001). Increase in mean ITV volume with MIP in all patient cohort was 49% [(ITV-M - ITV-L)x100 / ITV-M], in 1-view cohort 37%, 2-view 52%, right lung 38%, left lung 68.5%, upper lobe lung 51%, middle lobe 42%, lower lobe 34%, primary lung cancer 53% and metastatic lung cancer 34% respectively. Conclusions: MIP generated ITV volumes are significantly larger compared to LOT generated volume. ITV-M is larger in relation to lobes, side of tumour and type of tumour. There may be higher lung tissue necrosis when treated with ITV-M, as the 'high dose' volumes are more in this patient cohort.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信