用于生物技术应用的模型细胞系中可接近转染方法的比较效率

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
P. Vorobyev, DV Kochetkov, K. Vasilenko, A. Lipatova
{"title":"用于生物技术应用的模型细胞系中可接近转染方法的比较效率","authors":"P. Vorobyev, DV Kochetkov, K. Vasilenko, A. Lipatova","doi":"10.24075/brsmu.2022.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Transient gene expression is one of the most common methods in molecular biology, equally relevant for basic research projects and biotechnological industries. Despite the existence of commercial transfection systems, which afford high transfection efficiency and high expression levels of reporter genes, expanding such systems to industrial scales is often problematic due to high costs of the reagents. The well-described methods of cationic and calcium-phosphate transfection are accessible and ensure reproducible results at much lower costs. This study is aimed at comparative validation of calcium phosphate and cationic (polyethylenimine-based) transfection protocols along with the commercially available TurboFect reagent for mono- and cotransfections on a panel of commonly used cell lines including HEK293T, Huh7, BHK-21, CHO and MRC5. The efficiency of transfection with plasmid constructs encoding different fluorescent proteins was measured by flow cytometry. Of all the tested methods, calcium phosphate transfection afforded the highest efficiency of plasmid DNA delivery in all the cell lines except BHK21, for which the PEI method turned out to be more efficient than calcium phosphate transfection, and CHO, for which both methods showed comparable efficiency.","PeriodicalId":9344,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Russian State Medical University","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative efficiency of accessible transfection methods in model cell lines for biotechnological applications\",\"authors\":\"P. Vorobyev, DV Kochetkov, K. Vasilenko, A. Lipatova\",\"doi\":\"10.24075/brsmu.2022.031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Transient gene expression is one of the most common methods in molecular biology, equally relevant for basic research projects and biotechnological industries. Despite the existence of commercial transfection systems, which afford high transfection efficiency and high expression levels of reporter genes, expanding such systems to industrial scales is often problematic due to high costs of the reagents. The well-described methods of cationic and calcium-phosphate transfection are accessible and ensure reproducible results at much lower costs. This study is aimed at comparative validation of calcium phosphate and cationic (polyethylenimine-based) transfection protocols along with the commercially available TurboFect reagent for mono- and cotransfections on a panel of commonly used cell lines including HEK293T, Huh7, BHK-21, CHO and MRC5. The efficiency of transfection with plasmid constructs encoding different fluorescent proteins was measured by flow cytometry. Of all the tested methods, calcium phosphate transfection afforded the highest efficiency of plasmid DNA delivery in all the cell lines except BHK21, for which the PEI method turned out to be more efficient than calcium phosphate transfection, and CHO, for which both methods showed comparable efficiency.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9344,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Russian State Medical University\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Russian State Medical University\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24075/brsmu.2022.031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Russian State Medical University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24075/brsmu.2022.031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

瞬时基因表达是分子生物学中最常见的方法之一,与基础研究项目和生物技术产业同样相关。尽管存在商业转染系统,其提供高转染效率和高报告基因表达水平,但由于试剂的高成本,将这种系统扩展到工业规模通常是有问题的。众所周知的阳离子和磷酸钙转染方法是可获得的,并确保以低得多的成本获得可重复的结果。本研究旨在对磷酸钙和阳离子(基于聚乙烯亚胺)转染方案以及市售的TurboFect试剂在一组常用细胞系上的单转染和共转染进行比较验证,这些细胞系包括HEK293T、Huh7、BHK-21、CHO和MRC5。通过流式细胞术测量用编码不同荧光蛋白的质粒构建体转染的效率。在所有测试的方法中,磷酸钙转染在除BHK21和CHO之外的所有细胞系中提供了最高的质粒DNA递送效率,对于BHK21,PEI方法被证明比磷酸钙转染更有效,对于CHO,两种方法都显示出相当的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative efficiency of accessible transfection methods in model cell lines for biotechnological applications
Transient gene expression is one of the most common methods in molecular biology, equally relevant for basic research projects and biotechnological industries. Despite the existence of commercial transfection systems, which afford high transfection efficiency and high expression levels of reporter genes, expanding such systems to industrial scales is often problematic due to high costs of the reagents. The well-described methods of cationic and calcium-phosphate transfection are accessible and ensure reproducible results at much lower costs. This study is aimed at comparative validation of calcium phosphate and cationic (polyethylenimine-based) transfection protocols along with the commercially available TurboFect reagent for mono- and cotransfections on a panel of commonly used cell lines including HEK293T, Huh7, BHK-21, CHO and MRC5. The efficiency of transfection with plasmid constructs encoding different fluorescent proteins was measured by flow cytometry. Of all the tested methods, calcium phosphate transfection afforded the highest efficiency of plasmid DNA delivery in all the cell lines except BHK21, for which the PEI method turned out to be more efficient than calcium phosphate transfection, and CHO, for which both methods showed comparable efficiency.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bulletin of Russian State Medical University
Bulletin of Russian State Medical University MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Bulletin of Russian State Medical University (Bulletin of RSMU, ISSN Print 2500–1094, ISSN Online 2542–1204) is a peer-reviewed medical journal of Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (Moscow, Russia). The original language of the journal is Russian (Vestnik Rossiyskogo Gosudarstvennogo Meditsinskogo Universiteta, Vestnik RGMU, ISSN Print 2070–7320, ISSN Online 2070–7339). Founded in 1994, it is issued once every two months publishing articles on clinical medicine and medical and biological sciences, first of all oncology, neurobiology, allergy and immunology, medical genetics, medical microbiology and infectious diseases. Every issue is thematic. Deadlines for manuscript submission are announced in advance. The number of publications on topics in spite of the issue topic is limited. The journal accepts only original articles submitted by their authors, including articles that present methods and techniques, clinical cases and opinions. Authors must guarantee that their work has not been previously published elsewhere in whole or in part and in other languages and is not under consideration by another scientific journal. The journal publishes only one review per issue; the review is ordered by the editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信