重新聚焦弗雷格的另一个困惑：对斯奈德、塞缪尔和夏皮罗的回应

IF 0.8 1区哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE

Philosophia Mathematica Pub Date : 2023-02-20 DOI:10.1093/philmat/nkad005

Thomas Hofweber

{"title":"重新聚焦弗雷格的另一个困惑：对斯奈德、塞缪尔和夏皮罗的回应","authors":"Thomas Hofweber","doi":"10.1093/philmat/nkad005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In their recent article ‘Resolving Frege’s other Puzzle’ Eric Snyder, Richard Samuels, and Stewart Shapiro defend a semantic type-shifting solution to Frege’s other Puzzle and criticize my own cognitive type-shifting solution. In this article I respond to their criticism and in turn point to several problems with their preferred solution. In particular, I argue that they conflate semantic function and semantic value, and that their proposal is neither based on general semantic type-shifting principles nor adequate to the data.","PeriodicalId":49004,"journal":{"name":"Philosophia Mathematica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Refocusing Frege’s Other Puzzle: A Response to Snyder, Samuels, and Shapiro\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Hofweber\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/philmat/nkad005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n In their recent article ‘Resolving Frege’s other Puzzle’ Eric Snyder, Richard Samuels, and Stewart Shapiro defend a semantic type-shifting solution to Frege’s other Puzzle and criticize my own cognitive type-shifting solution. In this article I respond to their criticism and in turn point to several problems with their preferred solution. In particular, I argue that they conflate semantic function and semantic value, and that their proposal is neither based on general semantic type-shifting principles nor adequate to the data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49004,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophia Mathematica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophia Mathematica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/philmat/nkad005\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophia Mathematica","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/philmat/nkad005","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

Eric Snyder、Richard Samuels和Stewart Shapiro在他们最近的文章《解决Frege的另一个谜题》中为Frege的其他谜题的语义类型转换解决方案辩护，并批评了我自己的认知类型转换解决方法。在这篇文章中，我回应了他们的批评，并指出了他们首选解决方案的几个问题。特别是，我认为他们将语义功能和语义价值混为一谈，他们的建议既不基于一般的语义类型转换原则，也不适合数据。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Refocusing Frege’s Other Puzzle: A Response to Snyder, Samuels, and Shapiro

In their recent article ‘Resolving Frege’s other Puzzle’ Eric Snyder, Richard Samuels, and Stewart Shapiro defend a semantic type-shifting solution to Frege’s other Puzzle and criticize my own cognitive type-shifting solution. In this article I respond to their criticism and in turn point to several problems with their preferred solution. In particular, I argue that they conflate semantic function and semantic value, and that their proposal is neither based on general semantic type-shifting principles nor adequate to the data.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Philosophia Mathematica HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-

CiteScore

1.70

自引率

9.10%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Philosophia Mathematica is the only journal in the world devoted specifically to philosophy of mathematics. The journal publishes peer-reviewed new work in philosophy of mathematics, the application of mathematics, and computing. In addition to main articles, sometimes grouped on a single theme, there are shorter discussion notes, letters, and book reviews. The journal is published online-only, with three issues published per year.