对欧洲历史热浪强度(1979-2019)进行更全面的评估

IF 2 4区 地球科学 Q3 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Florian N. Becker, Andreas H. Fink, Peter Bissolli, Joaquim G. Pinto
{"title":"对欧洲历史热浪强度(1979-2019)进行更全面的评估","authors":"Florian N. Becker,&nbsp;Andreas H. Fink,&nbsp;Peter Bissolli,&nbsp;Joaquim G. Pinto","doi":"10.1002/asl.1120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Europe has been affected by record-breaking heat waves in recent decades. Using station data and a gridded reanalysis as input, four commonly used heat wave indices, the heat wave magnitude index daily (HWMId), excess heat factor (EHF), wet-bulb globe temperature (WBGT) and universal thermal climate index (UTCI), are computed. The extremeness of historical European heat waves between 1979 and 2019 using the four indices and different metrics is ranked. A normalisation to enable the comparison between the four indices is introduced. Additionally, a method to quantify the influence of the input parameters on heat wave magnitude is introduced. The spatio-temporal behaviour of heat waves is assessed by spatial–temporal tracking. The areal extent, large-scale intensity and duration are visualized using bubble plots. As expected, temperature explains the largest variance in all indices, but humidity is nearly as important in WBGT and wind speed plays a substantial role in UTCI. While the 2010 Russian heat wave is by far the most extreme event in duration and intensity in all normalized indices, the 2018 heat wave was comparable in size for EHF, WBGT and UTCI. Interestingly, the well-known 2003 central European heat wave was only the fifth and tenth strongest in cumulative intensity in WBGT and UTCI, respectively. The June and July 2019 heat waves were very intense, but short-lived, thus not belonging to the top heat waves in Europe when duration and areal extent are taken into account. Overall, the proposed normalized indices and the multi-metric assessment of large-scale heat waves allow for a more robust description of their extremeness and will be helpful to assess heat waves worldwide and in climate projections.</p>","PeriodicalId":50734,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric Science Letters","volume":"23 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/asl.1120","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards a more comprehensive assessment of the intensity of historical European heat waves (1979–2019)\",\"authors\":\"Florian N. Becker,&nbsp;Andreas H. Fink,&nbsp;Peter Bissolli,&nbsp;Joaquim G. Pinto\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/asl.1120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Europe has been affected by record-breaking heat waves in recent decades. Using station data and a gridded reanalysis as input, four commonly used heat wave indices, the heat wave magnitude index daily (HWMId), excess heat factor (EHF), wet-bulb globe temperature (WBGT) and universal thermal climate index (UTCI), are computed. The extremeness of historical European heat waves between 1979 and 2019 using the four indices and different metrics is ranked. A normalisation to enable the comparison between the four indices is introduced. Additionally, a method to quantify the influence of the input parameters on heat wave magnitude is introduced. The spatio-temporal behaviour of heat waves is assessed by spatial–temporal tracking. The areal extent, large-scale intensity and duration are visualized using bubble plots. As expected, temperature explains the largest variance in all indices, but humidity is nearly as important in WBGT and wind speed plays a substantial role in UTCI. While the 2010 Russian heat wave is by far the most extreme event in duration and intensity in all normalized indices, the 2018 heat wave was comparable in size for EHF, WBGT and UTCI. Interestingly, the well-known 2003 central European heat wave was only the fifth and tenth strongest in cumulative intensity in WBGT and UTCI, respectively. The June and July 2019 heat waves were very intense, but short-lived, thus not belonging to the top heat waves in Europe when duration and areal extent are taken into account. Overall, the proposed normalized indices and the multi-metric assessment of large-scale heat waves allow for a more robust description of their extremeness and will be helpful to assess heat waves worldwide and in climate projections.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Atmospheric Science Letters\",\"volume\":\"23 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/asl.1120\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Atmospheric Science Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asl.1120\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric Science Letters","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asl.1120","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

近几十年来,欧洲一直受到破纪录的热浪的影响。利用台站资料和网格化再分析作为输入,计算了4个常用的热浪指数:日热浪强度指数(HWMId)、余热系数(EHF)、全球湿球温度(WBGT)和通用热气候指数(UTCI)。利用这四个指数和不同的指标对1979年至2019年欧洲历史热浪的极端程度进行了排名。引入了一种标准化,使四个指标之间能够进行比较。此外,还介绍了一种量化输入参数对热浪强度影响的方法。利用时空跟踪技术对热浪的时空行为进行了评价。面积范围、大尺度强度和持续时间用气泡图可视化。正如预期的那样,温度在所有指数中解释了最大的方差,但湿度在WBGT中几乎同样重要,风速在UTCI中起着重要作用。虽然2010年俄罗斯热浪是迄今为止所有标准化指数中持续时间和强度最极端的事件,但2018年热浪的规模与EHF, WBGT和UTCI相当。有趣的是,众所周知的2003年中欧热浪在WBGT和UTCI的累积强度分别仅为第五和第十强。2019年6月和7月的热浪非常强烈,但时间很短,因此考虑到持续时间和面积范围,不属于欧洲最高的热浪。总的来说,提出的标准化指数和大尺度热浪的多尺度评估允许对其极端程度进行更可靠的描述,并将有助于评估全球热浪和气候预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Towards a more comprehensive assessment of the intensity of historical European heat waves (1979–2019)

Towards a more comprehensive assessment of the intensity of historical European heat waves (1979–2019)

Europe has been affected by record-breaking heat waves in recent decades. Using station data and a gridded reanalysis as input, four commonly used heat wave indices, the heat wave magnitude index daily (HWMId), excess heat factor (EHF), wet-bulb globe temperature (WBGT) and universal thermal climate index (UTCI), are computed. The extremeness of historical European heat waves between 1979 and 2019 using the four indices and different metrics is ranked. A normalisation to enable the comparison between the four indices is introduced. Additionally, a method to quantify the influence of the input parameters on heat wave magnitude is introduced. The spatio-temporal behaviour of heat waves is assessed by spatial–temporal tracking. The areal extent, large-scale intensity and duration are visualized using bubble plots. As expected, temperature explains the largest variance in all indices, but humidity is nearly as important in WBGT and wind speed plays a substantial role in UTCI. While the 2010 Russian heat wave is by far the most extreme event in duration and intensity in all normalized indices, the 2018 heat wave was comparable in size for EHF, WBGT and UTCI. Interestingly, the well-known 2003 central European heat wave was only the fifth and tenth strongest in cumulative intensity in WBGT and UTCI, respectively. The June and July 2019 heat waves were very intense, but short-lived, thus not belonging to the top heat waves in Europe when duration and areal extent are taken into account. Overall, the proposed normalized indices and the multi-metric assessment of large-scale heat waves allow for a more robust description of their extremeness and will be helpful to assess heat waves worldwide and in climate projections.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Atmospheric Science Letters
Atmospheric Science Letters METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.30%
发文量
73
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Atmospheric Science Letters (ASL) is a wholly Open Access electronic journal. Its aim is to provide a fully peer reviewed publication route for new shorter contributions in the field of atmospheric and closely related sciences. Through its ability to publish shorter contributions more rapidly than conventional journals, ASL offers a framework that promotes new understanding and creates scientific debate - providing a platform for discussing scientific issues and techniques. We encourage the presentation of multi-disciplinary work and contributions that utilise ideas and techniques from parallel areas. We particularly welcome contributions that maximise the visualisation capabilities offered by a purely on-line journal. ASL welcomes papers in the fields of: Dynamical meteorology; Ocean-atmosphere systems; Climate change, variability and impacts; New or improved observations from instrumentation; Hydrometeorology; Numerical weather prediction; Data assimilation and ensemble forecasting; Physical processes of the atmosphere; Land surface-atmosphere systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信