“这不仅仅是一本书的挑战”:教育工作者与审查经验的集体案例研究

IF 1.3 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
PhD Danielle E. Sachdeva, PhD Sue C. Kimmel, B. B. J. Sebastián Chérres
{"title":"“这不仅仅是一本书的挑战”:教育工作者与审查经验的集体案例研究","authors":"PhD Danielle E. Sachdeva, PhD Sue C. Kimmel, B. B. J. Sebastián Chérres","doi":"10.1177/01614681231184515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Challenges to books are surging across the United States, and books that portray diverse human experiences are particularly targeted. Censorship has deleterious consequences, such as undermining children’s intellectual freedom and influencing educators’ book selections. In a climate of censorship, when educators face the realistic possibility of a challenge, diverse voices may be silenced, and real-world issues avoided. Despite the impact that book challenges have, the experiences of educators who have faced them are understudied. Purpose: This study investigates the self-reported experiences of seven educators who have been involved in book challenges within K–12 public schools within the United States. Its goal is to yield new insights about how educators perceive the experience of censorship and what resources they leverage as they defend children’s right to read. It is significant because the lessons learned from these educators may be instructive for novice and veteran teachers and school librarians who are facing censorship—an increasingly likely possibility in contemporary times. It also highlights the range of forms that censorship takes within today’s schools. Research Design: This research employs a collective case study design. Seven teachers and school librarians from K–12 public schools across the United States were interviewed about their experiences with book challenges and other forms of censorship. Interview transcripts were qualitatively analyzed using Pierre Bourdieu’s types of cultural capital as a framework. Within-case and cross-case analyses are presented. Conclusions: Participants drew from various forms of cultural capital in their efforts to defend children’s intellectual freedom, including their professional ethics, school policies, and institutional knowledge. The study emphasizes the importance of building cultural capital among pre- and in-service educators within university preparation and professional development programs. It also calls on professional groups within education and librarianship to take an organized stand against censorship.","PeriodicalId":48274,"journal":{"name":"Teachers College Record","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“It’s Bigger Than Just a Book Challenge”: A Collective Case Study of Educators’ Experiences With Censorship\",\"authors\":\"PhD Danielle E. Sachdeva, PhD Sue C. Kimmel, B. B. J. Sebastián Chérres\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01614681231184515\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Challenges to books are surging across the United States, and books that portray diverse human experiences are particularly targeted. Censorship has deleterious consequences, such as undermining children’s intellectual freedom and influencing educators’ book selections. In a climate of censorship, when educators face the realistic possibility of a challenge, diverse voices may be silenced, and real-world issues avoided. Despite the impact that book challenges have, the experiences of educators who have faced them are understudied. Purpose: This study investigates the self-reported experiences of seven educators who have been involved in book challenges within K–12 public schools within the United States. Its goal is to yield new insights about how educators perceive the experience of censorship and what resources they leverage as they defend children’s right to read. It is significant because the lessons learned from these educators may be instructive for novice and veteran teachers and school librarians who are facing censorship—an increasingly likely possibility in contemporary times. It also highlights the range of forms that censorship takes within today’s schools. Research Design: This research employs a collective case study design. Seven teachers and school librarians from K–12 public schools across the United States were interviewed about their experiences with book challenges and other forms of censorship. Interview transcripts were qualitatively analyzed using Pierre Bourdieu’s types of cultural capital as a framework. Within-case and cross-case analyses are presented. Conclusions: Participants drew from various forms of cultural capital in their efforts to defend children’s intellectual freedom, including their professional ethics, school policies, and institutional knowledge. The study emphasizes the importance of building cultural capital among pre- and in-service educators within university preparation and professional development programs. It also calls on professional groups within education and librarianship to take an organized stand against censorship.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48274,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teachers College Record\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teachers College Record\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01614681231184515\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teachers College Record","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01614681231184515","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对书籍的挑战在美国各地激增,描绘不同人类经历的书籍尤其具有针对性。审查制度具有有害的后果,例如破坏儿童的知识自由和影响教育工作者的图书选择。在审查制度的氛围中,当教育工作者面临挑战的现实可能性时,不同的声音可能会被压制,现实世界的问题也会避免。尽管书籍挑战带来了影响,但面对这些挑战的教育工作者的经历却没有得到充分的研究。目的:本研究调查了七名参与美国K-12公立学校图书挑战的教育工作者的自我报告经历。它的目标是对教育工作者如何看待审查制度的经历,以及他们在捍卫儿童阅读权时利用了什么资源,产生新的见解。这一点意义重大,因为从这些教育工作者那里学到的教训可能对面临审查的新手和资深教师以及学校图书馆员有指导意义——在当代,这种可能性越来越大。它还强调了审查制度在当今学校中采取的一系列形式。研究设计:本研究采用集体案例研究设计。来自美国K-12公立学校的七名教师和学校图书馆员接受了采访,讲述了他们在图书挑战和其他形式的审查方面的经历。以皮埃尔·布迪厄的文化资本类型为框架,对访谈记录进行了定性分析。介绍了案例内分析和跨案例分析。结论:参与者在捍卫儿童知识自由的努力中汲取了各种形式的文化资本,包括他们的职业道德、学校政策和机构知识。该研究强调了在大学准备和专业发展计划中,在职前和在职教育工作者中建立文化资本的重要性。它还呼吁教育界和图书馆界的专业团体采取有组织的立场反对审查制度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“It’s Bigger Than Just a Book Challenge”: A Collective Case Study of Educators’ Experiences With Censorship
Background: Challenges to books are surging across the United States, and books that portray diverse human experiences are particularly targeted. Censorship has deleterious consequences, such as undermining children’s intellectual freedom and influencing educators’ book selections. In a climate of censorship, when educators face the realistic possibility of a challenge, diverse voices may be silenced, and real-world issues avoided. Despite the impact that book challenges have, the experiences of educators who have faced them are understudied. Purpose: This study investigates the self-reported experiences of seven educators who have been involved in book challenges within K–12 public schools within the United States. Its goal is to yield new insights about how educators perceive the experience of censorship and what resources they leverage as they defend children’s right to read. It is significant because the lessons learned from these educators may be instructive for novice and veteran teachers and school librarians who are facing censorship—an increasingly likely possibility in contemporary times. It also highlights the range of forms that censorship takes within today’s schools. Research Design: This research employs a collective case study design. Seven teachers and school librarians from K–12 public schools across the United States were interviewed about their experiences with book challenges and other forms of censorship. Interview transcripts were qualitatively analyzed using Pierre Bourdieu’s types of cultural capital as a framework. Within-case and cross-case analyses are presented. Conclusions: Participants drew from various forms of cultural capital in their efforts to defend children’s intellectual freedom, including their professional ethics, school policies, and institutional knowledge. The study emphasizes the importance of building cultural capital among pre- and in-service educators within university preparation and professional development programs. It also calls on professional groups within education and librarianship to take an organized stand against censorship.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Teachers College Record
Teachers College Record EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
89
期刊介绍: Teachers College Record (TCR) publishes the very best scholarship in all areas of the field of education. Major articles include research, analysis, and commentary covering the full range of contemporary issues in education, education policy, and the history of education. The book section contains essay reviews of new books in a specific area as well as reviews of individual books. TCR takes a deliberately expansive view of education to keep readers informed of the study of education worldwide, both inside and outside of the classroom and across the lifespan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信