动机通过两个过程改善工作记忆:优先排序和检索阈值

IF 3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY
John P. Grogan , Govind Randhawa , Minho Kim , Sanjay G. Manohar
{"title":"动机通过两个过程改善工作记忆:优先排序和检索阈值","authors":"John P. Grogan ,&nbsp;Govind Randhawa ,&nbsp;Minho Kim ,&nbsp;Sanjay G. Manohar","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2022.101472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Motivation can improve performance when the potential rewards outweigh the cost of effort expended. In working memory (WM), people can prioritise rewarded items at the expense of unrewarded items, suggesting a fixed memory capacity. But can capacity itself change with motivation? Across four experiments (N = 30–34) we demonstrate motivational improvements in WM even when <em>all</em> items were rewarded. However, this was not due to better memory precision, but rather better selection of the probed item within memory. Motivational improvements operated independently of encoding, maintenance, or attention shifts between items in memory. Moreover, motivation slowed responses. This contrasted with the benefits of rewarding items unequally, which allowed prioritisation of one item over another. We conclude that motivation can improve memory recall, not via precision or capacity, but via speed-accuracy trade-offs when selecting the item to retrieve.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50669,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Psychology","volume":"135 ","pages":"Article 101472"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001002852200010X/pdfft?md5=c7bff394b0f9a3286f01fdad650d1cb4&pid=1-s2.0-S001002852200010X-main.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Motivation improves working memory by two processes: Prioritisation and retrieval thresholds\",\"authors\":\"John P. Grogan ,&nbsp;Govind Randhawa ,&nbsp;Minho Kim ,&nbsp;Sanjay G. Manohar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2022.101472\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Motivation can improve performance when the potential rewards outweigh the cost of effort expended. In working memory (WM), people can prioritise rewarded items at the expense of unrewarded items, suggesting a fixed memory capacity. But can capacity itself change with motivation? Across four experiments (N = 30–34) we demonstrate motivational improvements in WM even when <em>all</em> items were rewarded. However, this was not due to better memory precision, but rather better selection of the probed item within memory. Motivational improvements operated independently of encoding, maintenance, or attention shifts between items in memory. Moreover, motivation slowed responses. This contrasted with the benefits of rewarding items unequally, which allowed prioritisation of one item over another. We conclude that motivation can improve memory recall, not via precision or capacity, but via speed-accuracy trade-offs when selecting the item to retrieve.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50669,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Psychology\",\"volume\":\"135 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101472\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001002852200010X/pdfft?md5=c7bff394b0f9a3286f01fdad650d1cb4&pid=1-s2.0-S001002852200010X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001002852200010X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001002852200010X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

当潜在的回报超过付出的努力成本时,激励可以提高绩效。在工作记忆(WM)中,人们可以以牺牲非奖励项目为代价优先考虑奖励项目,这表明记忆容量是固定的。但是能力本身能随着动机而改变吗?在四个实验中(N = 30-34),我们证明了即使所有物品都得到奖励,WM的动机也会得到改善。然而,这不是由于更好的内存精度,而是由于更好地选择了内存中的探测项。动机改善独立于编码、维持或记忆项目之间的注意力转移。此外,动机会减缓反应。这与不平等奖励道具的好处形成了对比,后者允许将一个道具优先于另一个。我们得出结论,动机可以提高记忆,不是通过准确性或容量,而是通过选择要检索的项目时的速度-准确性权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Motivation improves working memory by two processes: Prioritisation and retrieval thresholds

Motivation can improve performance when the potential rewards outweigh the cost of effort expended. In working memory (WM), people can prioritise rewarded items at the expense of unrewarded items, suggesting a fixed memory capacity. But can capacity itself change with motivation? Across four experiments (N = 30–34) we demonstrate motivational improvements in WM even when all items were rewarded. However, this was not due to better memory precision, but rather better selection of the probed item within memory. Motivational improvements operated independently of encoding, maintenance, or attention shifts between items in memory. Moreover, motivation slowed responses. This contrasted with the benefits of rewarding items unequally, which allowed prioritisation of one item over another. We conclude that motivation can improve memory recall, not via precision or capacity, but via speed-accuracy trade-offs when selecting the item to retrieve.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive Psychology
Cognitive Psychology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
29
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Cognitive Psychology is concerned with advances in the study of attention, memory, language processing, perception, problem solving, and thinking. Cognitive Psychology specializes in extensive articles that have a major impact on cognitive theory and provide new theoretical advances. Research Areas include: • Artificial intelligence • Developmental psychology • Linguistics • Neurophysiology • Social psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信