正面碰撞下客车车门的评估

IF 3.5 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
R. Lopes, Francisco Barros, F. Melo, N. Ramos, R. Cunha, Ricardo Maia, R. Rodrigues, M. Parente, P. Moreira
{"title":"正面碰撞下客车车门的评估","authors":"R. Lopes, Francisco Barros, F. Melo, N. Ramos, R. Cunha, Ricardo Maia, R. Rodrigues, M. Parente, P. Moreira","doi":"10.1108/ijsi-04-2022-0053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe vehicle´s body front pillar should absorb most of the striker kinetic energy, while only a fraction of that is absorbed by the door structure. This study aims to discuss the aforementioned issue. In this test the striker is a virtual entity. Six uniaxial strain gauges are installed throughout the door. Additionally, contactless 3D digital image correlation (DIC) allows to assess the major door panel’s continuous deformation and strain fields.Design/methodology/approachA coach is a large and heavy long-distance passenger transport vehicle. Their structural certification, classifies coaches as M3 Class III vehicles. New coach structures’ designs need analyses of each sub-system for critical pre-validation of the entire structure, aiming driver and passenger carrier safety. Also, a thorough examination due to increased travel speed is needed.FindingsExperimental pseudo-dynamic (PSD) results were compared and validated using finite element method (FEM) with two pieces of distinct FEM software (Abaqus® and PamCrash®). The time dependent solution was carried out by explicit techniques. Results by FEM and PSD test showed good agreement, evidencing the reliability of the tools selected. Results by PamCrash® were closer to the experimental data.Practical implicationsR-29 is truck-only regulation, however can be adapted to coaches in case of a frontal collision. The present work focuses on the impact behavior of the passenger front door subsystem.Originality/valueAs a first validation the entire structure, the behavior of a vehicle door, under in-plane impacts was studied. The corresponding deformation energy absorbed by the frontal passenger coach door under virtual impacts of a swinging striker was assessed using a PSD approach.","PeriodicalId":45359,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Structural Integrity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of a coach door under a frontal impact\",\"authors\":\"R. Lopes, Francisco Barros, F. Melo, N. Ramos, R. Cunha, Ricardo Maia, R. Rodrigues, M. Parente, P. Moreira\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ijsi-04-2022-0053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThe vehicle´s body front pillar should absorb most of the striker kinetic energy, while only a fraction of that is absorbed by the door structure. This study aims to discuss the aforementioned issue. In this test the striker is a virtual entity. Six uniaxial strain gauges are installed throughout the door. Additionally, contactless 3D digital image correlation (DIC) allows to assess the major door panel’s continuous deformation and strain fields.Design/methodology/approachA coach is a large and heavy long-distance passenger transport vehicle. Their structural certification, classifies coaches as M3 Class III vehicles. New coach structures’ designs need analyses of each sub-system for critical pre-validation of the entire structure, aiming driver and passenger carrier safety. Also, a thorough examination due to increased travel speed is needed.FindingsExperimental pseudo-dynamic (PSD) results were compared and validated using finite element method (FEM) with two pieces of distinct FEM software (Abaqus® and PamCrash®). The time dependent solution was carried out by explicit techniques. Results by FEM and PSD test showed good agreement, evidencing the reliability of the tools selected. Results by PamCrash® were closer to the experimental data.Practical implicationsR-29 is truck-only regulation, however can be adapted to coaches in case of a frontal collision. The present work focuses on the impact behavior of the passenger front door subsystem.Originality/valueAs a first validation the entire structure, the behavior of a vehicle door, under in-plane impacts was studied. The corresponding deformation energy absorbed by the frontal passenger coach door under virtual impacts of a swinging striker was assessed using a PSD approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45359,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Structural Integrity\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Structural Integrity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijsi-04-2022-0053\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Structural Integrity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijsi-04-2022-0053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的车身前立柱应吸收大部分撞击动能,而车门结构仅吸收一小部分。本研究旨在讨论上述问题。在这个测试中,前锋是一个虚拟实体。整个门上安装了六个单轴应变仪。此外,非接触式3D数字图像相关(DIC)可以评估主门板的连续变形和应变场。设计/方法/方法客车是一种大型重型长途客运车辆。其结构认证将客车归类为M3三级车辆。新客车结构的设计需要对每个子系统进行分析,以便对整个结构进行关键的预验证,以确保驾驶员和乘客的安全。此外,由于行驶速度增加,需要进行彻底检查。发现使用有限元法(FEM)和两个不同的FEM软件(Abaqus®和PamCrash®)对实验伪动力学(PSD)结果进行了比较和验证。时间相关的解决方案是通过显式技术实现的。有限元和PSD测试结果吻合良好,证明了所选刀具的可靠性。PamCrash®的结果更接近实验数据。实际含义R-29是卡车专用法规,但在发生正面碰撞时可适用于客车。目前的工作集中在乘客前门子系统的冲击行为。独创性/价值作为对整个结构的首次验证,研究了车门在平面内碰撞下的行为。使用PSD方法评估了在摆动撞锤的虚拟冲击下,前排乘客客车车门吸收的相应变形能量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of a coach door under a frontal impact
PurposeThe vehicle´s body front pillar should absorb most of the striker kinetic energy, while only a fraction of that is absorbed by the door structure. This study aims to discuss the aforementioned issue. In this test the striker is a virtual entity. Six uniaxial strain gauges are installed throughout the door. Additionally, contactless 3D digital image correlation (DIC) allows to assess the major door panel’s continuous deformation and strain fields.Design/methodology/approachA coach is a large and heavy long-distance passenger transport vehicle. Their structural certification, classifies coaches as M3 Class III vehicles. New coach structures’ designs need analyses of each sub-system for critical pre-validation of the entire structure, aiming driver and passenger carrier safety. Also, a thorough examination due to increased travel speed is needed.FindingsExperimental pseudo-dynamic (PSD) results were compared and validated using finite element method (FEM) with two pieces of distinct FEM software (Abaqus® and PamCrash®). The time dependent solution was carried out by explicit techniques. Results by FEM and PSD test showed good agreement, evidencing the reliability of the tools selected. Results by PamCrash® were closer to the experimental data.Practical implicationsR-29 is truck-only regulation, however can be adapted to coaches in case of a frontal collision. The present work focuses on the impact behavior of the passenger front door subsystem.Originality/valueAs a first validation the entire structure, the behavior of a vehicle door, under in-plane impacts was studied. The corresponding deformation energy absorbed by the frontal passenger coach door under virtual impacts of a swinging striker was assessed using a PSD approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Structural Integrity
International Journal of Structural Integrity ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
14.80%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信