EXPRESS:过去经历的幽灵如何困扰有问题的搜索

IF 5.2 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Joseph J. Cabral, Dinesh N Iyer, J. O’Brien
{"title":"EXPRESS:过去经历的幽灵如何困扰有问题的搜索","authors":"Joseph J. Cabral, Dinesh N Iyer, J. O’Brien","doi":"10.1177/14761270221142554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The behavioral theory of the firm (BTF) suggests that when performance falls below aspirations, firms engage in problemistic search for solutions to the performance shortfall. In this paper, we contend recent experience is a critical determinant of the search mode employed by the firm. With this foundation, we examine the boundary conditions of search and investigate whether central BTF concepts of coalitions, routines, and slack resources exacerbate or alleviate the effect of recent experience. We focus our theorizing and empirical tests on R&D search, and results confirm that a firm will generally only engage in a specific search mode in response to performance shortfalls if it has had recent experience with that activity. Examination of boundary conditions indicates that the influence of recent experience is: weaker for firms that have experience with other search modes; weaker for diversified firms; stronger for larger firms; and stronger for firms with more absorbed slack.","PeriodicalId":22087,"journal":{"name":"Strategic Organization","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EXPRESS: How the Ghosts of Past Experience Haunt Problemistic Search\",\"authors\":\"Joseph J. Cabral, Dinesh N Iyer, J. O’Brien\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14761270221142554\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The behavioral theory of the firm (BTF) suggests that when performance falls below aspirations, firms engage in problemistic search for solutions to the performance shortfall. In this paper, we contend recent experience is a critical determinant of the search mode employed by the firm. With this foundation, we examine the boundary conditions of search and investigate whether central BTF concepts of coalitions, routines, and slack resources exacerbate or alleviate the effect of recent experience. We focus our theorizing and empirical tests on R&D search, and results confirm that a firm will generally only engage in a specific search mode in response to performance shortfalls if it has had recent experience with that activity. Examination of boundary conditions indicates that the influence of recent experience is: weaker for firms that have experience with other search modes; weaker for diversified firms; stronger for larger firms; and stronger for firms with more absorbed slack.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Strategic Organization\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Strategic Organization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14761270221142554\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategic Organization","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14761270221142554","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

企业行为理论(BTF)表明,当业绩低于预期时,企业会以问题为导向寻找解决业绩不足的方法。在本文中,我们认为最近的经验是公司采用搜索模式的关键决定因素。在此基础上,我们研究了搜索的边界条件,并调查了BTF的核心概念——联盟、常规和闲置资源——是否加剧或减轻了最近经验的影响。我们将我们的理论和实证测试重点放在研发搜索上,结果证实,如果一家公司最近有过特定的搜索模式的经验,它通常只会参与该模式来应对业绩不足。对边界条件的考察表明,最近经验的影响是:对于有其他搜索模式经验的公司来说较弱;多元化企业较弱;大公司更强;而对于那些有更多吸收松弛的公司来说则更为强劲。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EXPRESS: How the Ghosts of Past Experience Haunt Problemistic Search
The behavioral theory of the firm (BTF) suggests that when performance falls below aspirations, firms engage in problemistic search for solutions to the performance shortfall. In this paper, we contend recent experience is a critical determinant of the search mode employed by the firm. With this foundation, we examine the boundary conditions of search and investigate whether central BTF concepts of coalitions, routines, and slack resources exacerbate or alleviate the effect of recent experience. We focus our theorizing and empirical tests on R&D search, and results confirm that a firm will generally only engage in a specific search mode in response to performance shortfalls if it has had recent experience with that activity. Examination of boundary conditions indicates that the influence of recent experience is: weaker for firms that have experience with other search modes; weaker for diversified firms; stronger for larger firms; and stronger for firms with more absorbed slack.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
8.20%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Strategic Organization is devoted to publishing high-quality, peer-reviewed, discipline-grounded conceptual and empirical research of interest to researchers, teachers, students, and practitioners of strategic management and organization. The journal also aims to be of considerable interest to senior managers in government, industry, and particularly the growing management consulting industry. Strategic Organization provides an international, interdisciplinary forum designed to improve our understanding of the interrelated dynamics of strategic and organizational processes and outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信