西班牙样本中教师自我效能感量表的效度证据

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY
J. Bueno-Álvarez, Margarita Martín-Martín, Enrique Navarro Asencio, Isabel-Inmaculada Asensio-Muñoz
{"title":"西班牙样本中教师自我效能感量表的效度证据","authors":"J. Bueno-Álvarez, Margarita Martín-Martín, Enrique Navarro Asencio, Isabel-Inmaculada Asensio-Muñoz","doi":"10.6018/analesps.522321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Teachers’ sense of self-efficacy is a hard construct to measure but is important in view of to its relationship with the quality of education. This work aims to gather evidence regarding the consistency and validity of a version of the Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale (TSES) for use in Spain. The data come from a Spanish group of future early-years, primary and high school teachers (N = 744), and they are analysed using a multivariate approach suitable for ordinal scales, with confirmatory factor analysis (ULSMV) and decision trees (CHAID and CART). After evaluating three measurement models, evidence for the validity of a construct structure with three factors and 17 items with acceptable fit indices is provided. In addition, the convergence and consistency of the construct are both endorsed, as is the usefulness of the items for predicting overall teacher self-efficacy in the groups of undergraduate and master’s students in the sample studied.\n El sentimiento de autoeficacia docente (SAD) es un constructo de compleja medida pero relevante por su relación con la calidad de la educación. Con este trabajo se pretende acumular evidencias de consistencia y validez para su uso en España de una versión del Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale (TSES). Los datos proceden de un colectivo español de futuros profesores de infantil, primaria y secundaria (N = 744) y se analizan desde un enfoque multivariado adecuado para escala ordinal, mediante análisis factorial confirmatorio (ULSMV) y árboles de decisión (CHAID y CART). Tras evaluar tres modelos de medida, se aportan evidencias de validez de una estructura del constructo en tres factores y 17 ítems, con índices de ajuste aceptables. Además, se avala tanto la convergencia y consistencia del constructo, como la utilidad de los ítems para la predicción de la autoeficacia docente global en los colectivos de estudiantes de grado y de máster que componen la muestra estudiada.","PeriodicalId":55521,"journal":{"name":"Anales De Psicologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evidencias de validez de la Escala de Sentimiento de Autoeficacia Docente en una muestra española\",\"authors\":\"J. Bueno-Álvarez, Margarita Martín-Martín, Enrique Navarro Asencio, Isabel-Inmaculada Asensio-Muñoz\",\"doi\":\"10.6018/analesps.522321\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Teachers’ sense of self-efficacy is a hard construct to measure but is important in view of to its relationship with the quality of education. This work aims to gather evidence regarding the consistency and validity of a version of the Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale (TSES) for use in Spain. The data come from a Spanish group of future early-years, primary and high school teachers (N = 744), and they are analysed using a multivariate approach suitable for ordinal scales, with confirmatory factor analysis (ULSMV) and decision trees (CHAID and CART). After evaluating three measurement models, evidence for the validity of a construct structure with three factors and 17 items with acceptable fit indices is provided. In addition, the convergence and consistency of the construct are both endorsed, as is the usefulness of the items for predicting overall teacher self-efficacy in the groups of undergraduate and master’s students in the sample studied.\\n El sentimiento de autoeficacia docente (SAD) es un constructo de compleja medida pero relevante por su relación con la calidad de la educación. Con este trabajo se pretende acumular evidencias de consistencia y validez para su uso en España de una versión del Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale (TSES). Los datos proceden de un colectivo español de futuros profesores de infantil, primaria y secundaria (N = 744) y se analizan desde un enfoque multivariado adecuado para escala ordinal, mediante análisis factorial confirmatorio (ULSMV) y árboles de decisión (CHAID y CART). Tras evaluar tres modelos de medida, se aportan evidencias de validez de una estructura del constructo en tres factores y 17 ítems, con índices de ajuste aceptables. Además, se avala tanto la convergencia y consistencia del constructo, como la utilidad de los ítems para la predicción de la autoeficacia docente global en los colectivos de estudiantes de grado y de máster que componen la muestra estudiada.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55521,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anales De Psicologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anales De Psicologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.522321\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anales De Psicologia","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.522321","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

教师的自我效能感是一个难以测量的结构,但由于其与教育质量的关系而具有重要意义。这项工作旨在收集关于教师效能感量表(TSES)在西班牙使用的一致性和有效性的证据。数据来自西班牙一组未来的小学和高中教师(N = 744),并使用适合有序量表的多变量方法进行分析,包括验证性因子分析(ULSMV)和决策树(CHAID和CART)。通过对三种测量模型的评价,为具有三因素、17项可接受拟合指标的构式结构的有效性提供了证据。此外,结构的收敛性和一致性都得到了认可,正如在样本研究的本科生和硕士生群体中预测教师整体自我效能感的项目的有用性一样。El sentimiento de autotelicacia docente (SAD)是一种复杂的媒体结构,它的相关数据为relación con la calidad de la educación。通过对教师效能感量表(TSES)的验证,验证了累积证据的一致性España de una versión。收集的数据过程为español de futuros profores de infant, primary y seconseconaria (N = 744),分析的结果为:采用enfoque multivariado adecuado para escala ordinal,中间的análisis factorial confirmatorio (ULSMV)和árboles de decisión (CHAID y CART)。通过对建筑结构模型的评估,发现了建筑结构模型的有效性的重要证据,并于2017年ítems、índices对建筑结构模型进行了调整。Además,“建筑的一致性”,“建筑的一致性”,“建筑的效用”,“建筑的一致性”ítems para la predicción“建筑的一致性”,“建筑的一致性”,“建筑的一致性”,“建筑的一致性”,“建筑的一致性”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evidencias de validez de la Escala de Sentimiento de Autoeficacia Docente en una muestra española
Teachers’ sense of self-efficacy is a hard construct to measure but is important in view of to its relationship with the quality of education. This work aims to gather evidence regarding the consistency and validity of a version of the Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale (TSES) for use in Spain. The data come from a Spanish group of future early-years, primary and high school teachers (N = 744), and they are analysed using a multivariate approach suitable for ordinal scales, with confirmatory factor analysis (ULSMV) and decision trees (CHAID and CART). After evaluating three measurement models, evidence for the validity of a construct structure with three factors and 17 items with acceptable fit indices is provided. In addition, the convergence and consistency of the construct are both endorsed, as is the usefulness of the items for predicting overall teacher self-efficacy in the groups of undergraduate and master’s students in the sample studied. El sentimiento de autoeficacia docente (SAD) es un constructo de compleja medida pero relevante por su relación con la calidad de la educación. Con este trabajo se pretende acumular evidencias de consistencia y validez para su uso en España de una versión del Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale (TSES). Los datos proceden de un colectivo español de futuros profesores de infantil, primaria y secundaria (N = 744) y se analizan desde un enfoque multivariado adecuado para escala ordinal, mediante análisis factorial confirmatorio (ULSMV) y árboles de decisión (CHAID y CART). Tras evaluar tres modelos de medida, se aportan evidencias de validez de una estructura del constructo en tres factores y 17 ítems, con índices de ajuste aceptables. Además, se avala tanto la convergencia y consistencia del constructo, como la utilidad de los ítems para la predicción de la autoeficacia docente global en los colectivos de estudiantes de grado y de máster que componen la muestra estudiada.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anales De Psicologia
Anales De Psicologia 医学-心理学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
57
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Anales de Psicologia / Annals of Psychology is a multidisciplinary journal of the various thematic areas of scientific psychology. It publishes original research articles and theoretical review in any of its basic, applied and methodological areas included within psychology. Publishing, financing, marketing and distribution corresponds Editum: Editions of the University of Murcia (Spain). The organizational guidelines and editorial policies come from the Editorial Team (elected for four years by the Areas and / or Departments of Psychology at the University of Murcia) and the Editorial Board, composed of scholars and experts from different universities and institutions national and international. It is published in print (ISSN: 0212-9728) since 1984 and in Internet publishing (web) (ISSN: 1695-2294) since 2000. Available online full text in pdf from the vol. 1 1984. Anales de Psicologia / Annals of Psychology maintains a system of exchange with other journals and publications of psychology in the world. Through an free exchange agreement with their respective publishers or entities responsible for editing, these journals and publications are received at the University of Murcia (Biblioteca "Luis Vives", near the Faculty of Psychology) and in return, our journal is sent to libraries and educational and research institutions such centers responsible for editing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信