Gerold Besser, David Tianxiang Liu, Bertold Renner, Christian A. Mueller
{"title":"嗅探棒气味阈值和识别的自我测试——恢复“纸上气味曲线”方法","authors":"Gerold Besser, David Tianxiang Liu, Bertold Renner, Christian A. Mueller","doi":"10.1007/s12078-019-09263-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Olfactory testing helps in diagnosing olfactory dysfunction (OD). The Sniffin’ Sticks odor test kit is widely used for research and can be reused and summed scores of threshold (T), discrimination (D), and identification (I) allow comparison to normative data. Testing can be time consuming and odor pens have to be presented by an examiner. The aim of this study was to investigate for a self-administration strategy for testing T and D.</p><p>Fifty healthy subjects (30 female, 20 male, mean age 27.3?years?±?8.1, range 18–58) were included. T was tested by an examiner (T-as) in a reversed staircase manner and self-tested with randomly presented concentrations (T-rand) and ascending methods of limits (T-aml). D testing was performed with assistance (D-as) and self-administered (D-s). For self-testing, examinees were instructed to perform the “odor-curves-on-paper” method.</p><p>Mean TDI was 35.9?±?3.0, range 26.5–42.8. T-as scores were significantly lower than T-aml (<i>p</i>?<?0.001) and T-rand (<i>p</i>?<?0.05). T-aml was significantly faster than T-rand and T-as modalities (<i>p</i>?<?0.001); Paired <i>t</i> test revealed no significant difference of D-as and D-s, in terms of scores and time needed (<i>p</i>?>?0.05) and the mean difference was small (0.3).</p><p>The results of this study demonstrate the “odor-curves-on-paper” method is applicable for D and with restrictions for T testing.</p><p>Self-administration of olfactory testing using Sniffin’ Sticks can, with appropriate instructions, easily be performed and may improve patient care in personnel and (with limitations) time-restricted settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":516,"journal":{"name":"Chemosensory Perception","volume":"13 1","pages":"71 - 77"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s12078-019-09263-x","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-Administered Testing of Odor Threshold and Discrimination Using Sniffin’ Sticks—Reviving the “Odor-Curves-On-Paper” Method\",\"authors\":\"Gerold Besser, David Tianxiang Liu, Bertold Renner, Christian A. Mueller\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12078-019-09263-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Olfactory testing helps in diagnosing olfactory dysfunction (OD). The Sniffin’ Sticks odor test kit is widely used for research and can be reused and summed scores of threshold (T), discrimination (D), and identification (I) allow comparison to normative data. Testing can be time consuming and odor pens have to be presented by an examiner. The aim of this study was to investigate for a self-administration strategy for testing T and D.</p><p>Fifty healthy subjects (30 female, 20 male, mean age 27.3?years?±?8.1, range 18–58) were included. T was tested by an examiner (T-as) in a reversed staircase manner and self-tested with randomly presented concentrations (T-rand) and ascending methods of limits (T-aml). D testing was performed with assistance (D-as) and self-administered (D-s). For self-testing, examinees were instructed to perform the “odor-curves-on-paper” method.</p><p>Mean TDI was 35.9?±?3.0, range 26.5–42.8. T-as scores were significantly lower than T-aml (<i>p</i>?<?0.001) and T-rand (<i>p</i>?<?0.05). T-aml was significantly faster than T-rand and T-as modalities (<i>p</i>?<?0.001); Paired <i>t</i> test revealed no significant difference of D-as and D-s, in terms of scores and time needed (<i>p</i>?>?0.05) and the mean difference was small (0.3).</p><p>The results of this study demonstrate the “odor-curves-on-paper” method is applicable for D and with restrictions for T testing.</p><p>Self-administration of olfactory testing using Sniffin’ Sticks can, with appropriate instructions, easily be performed and may improve patient care in personnel and (with limitations) time-restricted settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chemosensory Perception\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"71 - 77\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s12078-019-09263-x\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chemosensory Perception\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12078-019-09263-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Neuroscience\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemosensory Perception","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12078-019-09263-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
Self-Administered Testing of Odor Threshold and Discrimination Using Sniffin’ Sticks—Reviving the “Odor-Curves-On-Paper” Method
Olfactory testing helps in diagnosing olfactory dysfunction (OD). The Sniffin’ Sticks odor test kit is widely used for research and can be reused and summed scores of threshold (T), discrimination (D), and identification (I) allow comparison to normative data. Testing can be time consuming and odor pens have to be presented by an examiner. The aim of this study was to investigate for a self-administration strategy for testing T and D.
Fifty healthy subjects (30 female, 20 male, mean age 27.3?years?±?8.1, range 18–58) were included. T was tested by an examiner (T-as) in a reversed staircase manner and self-tested with randomly presented concentrations (T-rand) and ascending methods of limits (T-aml). D testing was performed with assistance (D-as) and self-administered (D-s). For self-testing, examinees were instructed to perform the “odor-curves-on-paper” method.
Mean TDI was 35.9?±?3.0, range 26.5–42.8. T-as scores were significantly lower than T-aml (p?<?0.001) and T-rand (p?<?0.05). T-aml was significantly faster than T-rand and T-as modalities (p?<?0.001); Paired t test revealed no significant difference of D-as and D-s, in terms of scores and time needed (p?>?0.05) and the mean difference was small (0.3).
The results of this study demonstrate the “odor-curves-on-paper” method is applicable for D and with restrictions for T testing.
Self-administration of olfactory testing using Sniffin’ Sticks can, with appropriate instructions, easily be performed and may improve patient care in personnel and (with limitations) time-restricted settings.
期刊介绍:
Coverage in Chemosensory Perception includes animal work with implications for human phenomena and explores the following areas:
Identification of chemicals producing sensory response;
Identification of sensory response associated with chemicals;
Human in vivo response to chemical stimuli;
Human in vitro response to chemical stimuli;
Neuroimaging of chemosensory function;
Neurological processing of chemoreception;
Chemoreception mechanisms;
Psychophysics of chemoperception;
Trigeminal function;
Multisensory perception;
Contextual effect on chemoperception;
Behavioral response to chemical stimuli;
Physiological factors affecting and contributing to chemoperception;
Flavor and hedonics;
Memory and chemoperception.