{"title":"阿德里亚娜·卡瓦雷罗的《多元声音中的形而上学解构》","authors":"Iamni Reche Bezerra","doi":"10.5007/2175-7917.2021.E72079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On this paper, I aim at describing and commenting the configurations of unicity's vocalic ontology as defended by Adriana Cavarero on the work Vozes Plurais: filosofia da expressao vocal (2011). As we will see, the concern Cavarero directs to the voice comes from her critique on the metaphysical effort to unvocalize the logos, privileging the not sounding voice over the voice produced by a throat made of flesh. Therefore, the philosopher defends the necessity of a thought based on the singularity of the voice, which entails attention to a sounding and corporeal voice, one that is, above all, essentially relational. Next, I intend to present the antagonist elements of Cavarero's deconstruction and the one proposed by philosopher Jacques Derrida. As we will see, the matter seems to be properly located on what both her and Derrida, distinctively, indicate as the holding element of antimetaphysical validity.","PeriodicalId":30964,"journal":{"name":"Anuario de Literatura","volume":"26 1","pages":"01-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"desconstrução da metafísica em Vozes Plurais, de Adriana Cavarero\",\"authors\":\"Iamni Reche Bezerra\",\"doi\":\"10.5007/2175-7917.2021.E72079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"On this paper, I aim at describing and commenting the configurations of unicity's vocalic ontology as defended by Adriana Cavarero on the work Vozes Plurais: filosofia da expressao vocal (2011). As we will see, the concern Cavarero directs to the voice comes from her critique on the metaphysical effort to unvocalize the logos, privileging the not sounding voice over the voice produced by a throat made of flesh. Therefore, the philosopher defends the necessity of a thought based on the singularity of the voice, which entails attention to a sounding and corporeal voice, one that is, above all, essentially relational. Next, I intend to present the antagonist elements of Cavarero's deconstruction and the one proposed by philosopher Jacques Derrida. As we will see, the matter seems to be properly located on what both her and Derrida, distinctively, indicate as the holding element of antimetaphysical validity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30964,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anuario de Literatura\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"01-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anuario de Literatura\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7917.2021.E72079\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anuario de Literatura","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7917.2021.E72079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在这篇论文中,我旨在描述和评论Adriana Cavarero在作品《Vozes Plurais:filosofia da expressao vocal》(2011)中所捍卫的单一性声乐本体论的配置。正如我们将看到的那样,卡瓦雷罗对声音的关注来自于她对形而上学的努力的批判,即使理性不本地化,使听起来不好听的声音优先于由肉制成的喉咙发出的声音。因此,哲学家捍卫了基于声音奇异性的思想的必要性,这需要关注声音和物质的声音,最重要的是,这种声音本质上是关系的。接下来,我将介绍卡瓦雷罗解构主义的对立元素,以及哲学家德里达提出的解构主义。正如我们将看到的那样,这件事似乎恰当地定位在她和德里达明确指出的反物质有效性的持有要素上。
desconstrução da metafísica em Vozes Plurais, de Adriana Cavarero
On this paper, I aim at describing and commenting the configurations of unicity's vocalic ontology as defended by Adriana Cavarero on the work Vozes Plurais: filosofia da expressao vocal (2011). As we will see, the concern Cavarero directs to the voice comes from her critique on the metaphysical effort to unvocalize the logos, privileging the not sounding voice over the voice produced by a throat made of flesh. Therefore, the philosopher defends the necessity of a thought based on the singularity of the voice, which entails attention to a sounding and corporeal voice, one that is, above all, essentially relational. Next, I intend to present the antagonist elements of Cavarero's deconstruction and the one proposed by philosopher Jacques Derrida. As we will see, the matter seems to be properly located on what both her and Derrida, distinctively, indicate as the holding element of antimetaphysical validity.