一个值得记住的人:两部科科罗改编的电影

Kenta Kato
{"title":"一个值得记住的人:两部科科罗改编的电影","authors":"Kenta Kato","doi":"10.1080/17564905.2021.1969614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper investigates two film adaptations of Kokoro, one by Ichikawa Kon in 1955 and the other by Shindō Kaneto in 1973, to uncover transformations of male bonding in different contexts. Responding to the new libidinal economy of the Meiji era, Sōseki’s novel envisions the heteronormative future while corporeal desire between men is relegated to the past. The Meiji reconfiguration of sexuality and male bonding is transcoded to the 1950s post-war period in Ichikawa’s version and the post-protest 1970s in Shindō’s adaptation. The 1955 Kokoro emasculates the male characters as passive subjects who can only obediently follow shifting conventions of masculinity. Ichikawa’s contribution is to expose how social pressure is enforced upon people whose desire to deviate from the norms needs to be kept in secrecy. On the other hand, the 1973 Kokoro contributes to the homosocial imagination of political activism as a lamentable loss through which firm bonding between men is formed whereas the marital union is denied. In the analyses of the film adaptations of Kokoro, a transformative quality of male bonding inevitably exposes what the patriarchal system latches onto shifts as the times change.","PeriodicalId":37898,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Japanese and Korean Cinema","volume":"13 1","pages":"155 - 171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A man to remember: two film adaptations of Kokoro\",\"authors\":\"Kenta Kato\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17564905.2021.1969614\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This paper investigates two film adaptations of Kokoro, one by Ichikawa Kon in 1955 and the other by Shindō Kaneto in 1973, to uncover transformations of male bonding in different contexts. Responding to the new libidinal economy of the Meiji era, Sōseki’s novel envisions the heteronormative future while corporeal desire between men is relegated to the past. The Meiji reconfiguration of sexuality and male bonding is transcoded to the 1950s post-war period in Ichikawa’s version and the post-protest 1970s in Shindō’s adaptation. The 1955 Kokoro emasculates the male characters as passive subjects who can only obediently follow shifting conventions of masculinity. Ichikawa’s contribution is to expose how social pressure is enforced upon people whose desire to deviate from the norms needs to be kept in secrecy. On the other hand, the 1973 Kokoro contributes to the homosocial imagination of political activism as a lamentable loss through which firm bonding between men is formed whereas the marital union is denied. In the analyses of the film adaptations of Kokoro, a transformative quality of male bonding inevitably exposes what the patriarchal system latches onto shifts as the times change.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Japanese and Korean Cinema\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"155 - 171\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Japanese and Korean Cinema\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17564905.2021.1969614\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Japanese and Korean Cinema","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17564905.2021.1969614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文考察了1955年市川今和1973年金户信的两部改编自《Kokoro》的电影,以揭示不同语境下男性关系的转变。Sōseki的小说回应了明治时代的新性欲经济,设想了异性恋规范的未来,而男人之间的物质欲望则被归入过去。在市川的版本中,明治对性和男性关系的重新配置被转码到战后的20世纪50年代,而在新藤的改编中,则转码到抗议后的70年代。1955年的《科科罗》(Kokoro)将男性角色阉割为被动的主体,他们只能顺从地遵循不断变化的男性气质惯例。市川的贡献在于揭示了社会压力是如何施加在那些渴望偏离规范的人身上的,这些人需要保密。另一方面,1973年的Kokoro为同性恋社会对政治激进主义的想象做出了贡献,认为这是一种可悲的损失,通过这种损失,男性之间建立了牢固的联系,而婚姻联盟却被否定了。在对《科科罗》改编电影的分析中,男性关系的变革性不可避免地暴露了父权制度所依赖的东西随着时代的变化而变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A man to remember: two film adaptations of Kokoro
ABSTRACT This paper investigates two film adaptations of Kokoro, one by Ichikawa Kon in 1955 and the other by Shindō Kaneto in 1973, to uncover transformations of male bonding in different contexts. Responding to the new libidinal economy of the Meiji era, Sōseki’s novel envisions the heteronormative future while corporeal desire between men is relegated to the past. The Meiji reconfiguration of sexuality and male bonding is transcoded to the 1950s post-war period in Ichikawa’s version and the post-protest 1970s in Shindō’s adaptation. The 1955 Kokoro emasculates the male characters as passive subjects who can only obediently follow shifting conventions of masculinity. Ichikawa’s contribution is to expose how social pressure is enforced upon people whose desire to deviate from the norms needs to be kept in secrecy. On the other hand, the 1973 Kokoro contributes to the homosocial imagination of political activism as a lamentable loss through which firm bonding between men is formed whereas the marital union is denied. In the analyses of the film adaptations of Kokoro, a transformative quality of male bonding inevitably exposes what the patriarchal system latches onto shifts as the times change.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Japanese and Korean Cinema
Journal of Japanese and Korean Cinema Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Journal of Japanese and Korean Cinema is a fully refereed forum for the dissemination of scholarly work devoted to the cinemas of Japan and Korea and the interactions and relations between them. The increasingly transnational status of Japanese and Korean cinema underlines the need to deepen our understanding of this ever more globalized film-making region. Journal of Japanese and Korean Cinema is a peer-reviewed journal. The peer review process is double blind. Detailed Instructions for Authors can be found here.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信