{"title":"Lenz和Manquilef:民族主体的创造","authors":"Fernando Ruiz Figueroa","doi":"10.4067/S0718-93032020000200137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Through the discourse analysis of the paratexts present in Manuel Manquilef’s book: “Comentarios del Pueblo Araucano” (1911), this 1 Para correspondencia, dirigirse a: Fernando Ruiz Figueroa (fer.ruiz.f@gmail.com), Barros Arana 452, población Modelo, Puerto Montt. 138 BOLETÍN DE FILOLOGÍA TOMO LV, NÚMERO 2, 2020 study demonstrates how an ideology that relegates Mapuche language and culture to Chilean folklore is expressed. Rodolfo Lenz, as editor of this text, presents himself as the linguistic and editor the leads the reading of Manquilef’s central text, presenting it as the useful raw material for form Chilean national identity.","PeriodicalId":35098,"journal":{"name":"Boletin de Filologia","volume":"55 1","pages":"137-167"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lenz y Manquilef: la creación de un sujeto étnico\",\"authors\":\"Fernando Ruiz Figueroa\",\"doi\":\"10.4067/S0718-93032020000200137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Through the discourse analysis of the paratexts present in Manuel Manquilef’s book: “Comentarios del Pueblo Araucano” (1911), this 1 Para correspondencia, dirigirse a: Fernando Ruiz Figueroa (fer.ruiz.f@gmail.com), Barros Arana 452, población Modelo, Puerto Montt. 138 BOLETÍN DE FILOLOGÍA TOMO LV, NÚMERO 2, 2020 study demonstrates how an ideology that relegates Mapuche language and culture to Chilean folklore is expressed. Rodolfo Lenz, as editor of this text, presents himself as the linguistic and editor the leads the reading of Manquilef’s central text, presenting it as the useful raw material for form Chilean national identity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35098,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Boletin de Filologia\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"137-167\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Boletin de Filologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-93032020000200137\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Boletin de Filologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-93032020000200137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
通过对曼努埃尔·曼克列夫的著作《阿卢卡诺村的评注》(1911)中出现的副文本的话语分析,本1段对应文,指导文献a:费尔南多·鲁伊斯·菲格罗亚(fer.ruiz.f@gmail.com),巴罗斯·阿拉纳(Barros Arana) 452, población莫德罗,蒙特波多黎各,138 BOLETÍN DE FILOLOGÍA TOMO LV, NÚMERO 2, 2020研究展示了一种将马普切语言和文化降格为智利民间传说的意识形态是如何表达的。鲁道夫·伦茨,作为这本书的编辑,以语言学家和编辑的身份带领读者阅读曼奎利夫的中心文本,将其作为形成智利民族认同的有用原材料。
Through the discourse analysis of the paratexts present in Manuel Manquilef’s book: “Comentarios del Pueblo Araucano” (1911), this 1 Para correspondencia, dirigirse a: Fernando Ruiz Figueroa (fer.ruiz.f@gmail.com), Barros Arana 452, población Modelo, Puerto Montt. 138 BOLETÍN DE FILOLOGÍA TOMO LV, NÚMERO 2, 2020 study demonstrates how an ideology that relegates Mapuche language and culture to Chilean folklore is expressed. Rodolfo Lenz, as editor of this text, presents himself as the linguistic and editor the leads the reading of Manquilef’s central text, presenting it as the useful raw material for form Chilean national identity.
期刊介绍:
Edited by the Departmento de Lingüística of the Universidad de Chile, Boletín de Filología is mainly devoted to research in Hispanic linguistics and philology, though contributions on new theoretical developments and important methodological innovations in all areas of linguistics are also welcome.