{"title":"思想史的变化图景","authors":"Richard Drake","doi":"10.1353/scr.2022.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The field of intellectual history is undergoing a transformation because of the wide-ranging attempt to bring it into alignment with the methods and aspirations toward greater inclusiveness championed by social history. Combining social and intellectual history in one indivisible field of research, however, has a distinguished pedigree in the work of Karl Mannheim whose ideas merit reexamination today by intellectual historians on the question of how best to move the field forward.","PeriodicalId":42938,"journal":{"name":"South Central Review","volume":"39 1","pages":"39 - 51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Changing Landscape of Intellectual History\",\"authors\":\"Richard Drake\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/scr.2022.0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:The field of intellectual history is undergoing a transformation because of the wide-ranging attempt to bring it into alignment with the methods and aspirations toward greater inclusiveness championed by social history. Combining social and intellectual history in one indivisible field of research, however, has a distinguished pedigree in the work of Karl Mannheim whose ideas merit reexamination today by intellectual historians on the question of how best to move the field forward.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South Central Review\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"39 - 51\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South Central Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/scr.2022.0002\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Central Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/scr.2022.0002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract:The field of intellectual history is undergoing a transformation because of the wide-ranging attempt to bring it into alignment with the methods and aspirations toward greater inclusiveness championed by social history. Combining social and intellectual history in one indivisible field of research, however, has a distinguished pedigree in the work of Karl Mannheim whose ideas merit reexamination today by intellectual historians on the question of how best to move the field forward.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
