Emmet Crowley, Cormac Powell, Brian P Carson, Robert W Davies
{"title":"运动训练强度对健康成人最大摄氧量的影响:系统综述和荟萃分析","authors":"Emmet Crowley, Cormac Powell, Brian P Carson, Robert W Davies","doi":"10.1155/2022/9310710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate systematic reviews and meta-analyses that have examined the effect of exercise training on VO<sub>2</sub>max in healthy individuals at different intensities. Five databases were searched: EBSCOhost, MEDLINE/PubMed, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Eligibility criteria for selecting reviews included systematic reviews and meta-analyses of healthy adults that examined the effect of lower intensity training (LIT) and/or high intensity training (HIT) on VO<sub>2</sub>max. Eleven reviews met the eligibility criteria. All reviews were of moderate-to-very strong methodological quality. The included reviews reported data from 179 primary studies with an average of 23 ± 10 studies per review. All reviews included in this overview showed that exercise training robustly increased VO<sub>2</sub>max at all intensities. Three meta-analyses that compared LIT versus HIT protocols on VO<sub>2</sub>max reported small/moderate beneficial effects for HIT over LIT; however, the beneficial effects of HIT on VO<sub>2</sub>max appear to be moderated by training variables other than intensity (e.g., training impulse, interval length, training volume, and duration) and participants' baseline characteristics (e.g., age and fitness levels). Overall, evidence from this overview suggests that the apparent differences between LIT and HIT protocols on VO<sub>2</sub>max were either small, trivial, or inconclusive, with several methodological considerations required to standardise research designs and draw definitive conclusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11022784/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Exercise Training Intensity on VO<sub>2</sub>max in Healthy Adults: An Overview of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.\",\"authors\":\"Emmet Crowley, Cormac Powell, Brian P Carson, Robert W Davies\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2022/9310710\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate systematic reviews and meta-analyses that have examined the effect of exercise training on VO<sub>2</sub>max in healthy individuals at different intensities. Five databases were searched: EBSCOhost, MEDLINE/PubMed, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Eligibility criteria for selecting reviews included systematic reviews and meta-analyses of healthy adults that examined the effect of lower intensity training (LIT) and/or high intensity training (HIT) on VO<sub>2</sub>max. Eleven reviews met the eligibility criteria. All reviews were of moderate-to-very strong methodological quality. The included reviews reported data from 179 primary studies with an average of 23 ± 10 studies per review. All reviews included in this overview showed that exercise training robustly increased VO<sub>2</sub>max at all intensities. Three meta-analyses that compared LIT versus HIT protocols on VO<sub>2</sub>max reported small/moderate beneficial effects for HIT over LIT; however, the beneficial effects of HIT on VO<sub>2</sub>max appear to be moderated by training variables other than intensity (e.g., training impulse, interval length, training volume, and duration) and participants' baseline characteristics (e.g., age and fitness levels). Overall, evidence from this overview suggests that the apparent differences between LIT and HIT protocols on VO<sub>2</sub>max were either small, trivial, or inconclusive, with several methodological considerations required to standardise research designs and draw definitive conclusions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11022784/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9310710\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9310710","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究旨在评估系统综述和荟萃分析,这些综述和分析考察了不同强度下运动训练对健康个体VO2max的影响。搜索了五个数据库: EBSCOhost、MEDLINE/PubMed、SPORTDiscus、Web of Science和Google Scholar。选择审查的资格标准包括对健康成年人的系统审查和荟萃分析,这些审查检查了低强度训练(LIT)和/或高强度训练(HIT)对VO2max的影响。11项审查符合资格标准。所有审查都具有中等到非常强的方法质量。纳入的综述报告了179项初级研究的数据,平均23项 ± 每次审查10项研究。本综述中的所有综述都表明,运动训练在所有强度下都能显著提高VO2max。三项比较LIT与HIT方案在VO2max上的荟萃分析报告了HIT对LIT的小/中度有益作用;然而,HIT对VO2max的有益影响似乎受到训练变量的调节,而不是强度(例如,训练冲动、间歇时间、训练量和持续时间)和参与者的基线特征(例如,年龄和体能水平)。总的来说,来自该综述的证据表明,LIT和HIT协议在VO2max上的明显差异要么很小,要么微不足道,要么没有结论,需要考虑几个方法论因素来标准化研究设计并得出明确结论。
The Effect of Exercise Training Intensity on VO2max in Healthy Adults: An Overview of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
This study aimed to evaluate systematic reviews and meta-analyses that have examined the effect of exercise training on VO2max in healthy individuals at different intensities. Five databases were searched: EBSCOhost, MEDLINE/PubMed, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Eligibility criteria for selecting reviews included systematic reviews and meta-analyses of healthy adults that examined the effect of lower intensity training (LIT) and/or high intensity training (HIT) on VO2max. Eleven reviews met the eligibility criteria. All reviews were of moderate-to-very strong methodological quality. The included reviews reported data from 179 primary studies with an average of 23 ± 10 studies per review. All reviews included in this overview showed that exercise training robustly increased VO2max at all intensities. Three meta-analyses that compared LIT versus HIT protocols on VO2max reported small/moderate beneficial effects for HIT over LIT; however, the beneficial effects of HIT on VO2max appear to be moderated by training variables other than intensity (e.g., training impulse, interval length, training volume, and duration) and participants' baseline characteristics (e.g., age and fitness levels). Overall, evidence from this overview suggests that the apparent differences between LIT and HIT protocols on VO2max were either small, trivial, or inconclusive, with several methodological considerations required to standardise research designs and draw definitive conclusions.
期刊介绍:
Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance.
Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.