宗教教师对伊斯兰宗教教育教材中废除Khilafah和Jihad教材的认识

Addin Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.21043/addin.v15i2.9359
Puspo Nugroho, Ahmad Fatah, Aat Hidayat
{"title":"宗教教师对伊斯兰宗教教育教材中废除Khilafah和Jihad教材的认识","authors":"Puspo Nugroho, Ahmad Fatah, Aat Hidayat","doi":"10.21043/addin.v15i2.9359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine the perception of Fiqh teachers on changes in Khilafah material, radicalism in material content, and learning strategies for Khilafah material. The methodology employed in this research was a qualitative approach using a multistrategy, namely interviews, documentation, and observation. This study’s results revealed that at the first point regarding teachers’ perceptions of the policy, they tended to agree that there were several suggestions at the level of academic concepts, such as the need to be given a special space for Fiqh Siyasah content. Second, in the Khilafah material at Minister of Religion Decree (Keputusan Menteri Agama, KMA) Number 165 of 2014, absolutely no elements lead to radicalism. It all depended on how the teacher taught it. On the third point, it is more in the nature of adapting to the context in which Indonesia stands through discussion forums, is not rigid in using learning resources, and accommodates learning resources for the Qur’an and Hadith, Ijma’, Qiyas, Istihsan, Istishab, Maslahah Mursalah, ‘Urf, and some under the context of the Fiqh learning material. ","PeriodicalId":31011,"journal":{"name":"Addin","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Religion Teachers' Perceptions of the Abolition of the Khilafah and Jihad Teaching Materials in the Islamic Religious Education Textbook\",\"authors\":\"Puspo Nugroho, Ahmad Fatah, Aat Hidayat\",\"doi\":\"10.21043/addin.v15i2.9359\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to determine the perception of Fiqh teachers on changes in Khilafah material, radicalism in material content, and learning strategies for Khilafah material. The methodology employed in this research was a qualitative approach using a multistrategy, namely interviews, documentation, and observation. This study’s results revealed that at the first point regarding teachers’ perceptions of the policy, they tended to agree that there were several suggestions at the level of academic concepts, such as the need to be given a special space for Fiqh Siyasah content. Second, in the Khilafah material at Minister of Religion Decree (Keputusan Menteri Agama, KMA) Number 165 of 2014, absolutely no elements lead to radicalism. It all depended on how the teacher taught it. On the third point, it is more in the nature of adapting to the context in which Indonesia stands through discussion forums, is not rigid in using learning resources, and accommodates learning resources for the Qur’an and Hadith, Ijma’, Qiyas, Istihsan, Istishab, Maslahah Mursalah, ‘Urf, and some under the context of the Fiqh learning material. \",\"PeriodicalId\":31011,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Addin\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Addin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21043/addin.v15i2.9359\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21043/addin.v15i2.9359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在确定Fiqh教师对Khilafah材料变化、材料内容中的激进主义以及对Khilafa材料的学习策略的看法。本研究采用的方法是一种使用多策略的定性方法,即访谈、文献和观察。这项研究的结果表明,在第一点上,关于教师对该政策的看法,他们倾向于同意在学术概念层面上有几个建议,例如需要为Fiqh Siyasah内容留出一个特殊的空间。其次,在2014年第165号宗教部长令(Keputsan Menteri Agama,KMA)的Khilafah材料中,绝对没有任何因素导致激进主义。这一切都取决于老师是如何教授的。第三点,它更倾向于适应印度尼西亚通过论坛所处的环境,在使用学习资源方面并不僵化,并为《古兰经》和《圣训》、《伊吉玛》、《奇亚斯》、《伊斯提桑》、《伊斯蒂沙布》、《Maslahah Mursalah》、《乌尔都语》和一些《斐济语》学习材料提供学习资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Religion Teachers' Perceptions of the Abolition of the Khilafah and Jihad Teaching Materials in the Islamic Religious Education Textbook
This study aims to determine the perception of Fiqh teachers on changes in Khilafah material, radicalism in material content, and learning strategies for Khilafah material. The methodology employed in this research was a qualitative approach using a multistrategy, namely interviews, documentation, and observation. This study’s results revealed that at the first point regarding teachers’ perceptions of the policy, they tended to agree that there were several suggestions at the level of academic concepts, such as the need to be given a special space for Fiqh Siyasah content. Second, in the Khilafah material at Minister of Religion Decree (Keputusan Menteri Agama, KMA) Number 165 of 2014, absolutely no elements lead to radicalism. It all depended on how the teacher taught it. On the third point, it is more in the nature of adapting to the context in which Indonesia stands through discussion forums, is not rigid in using learning resources, and accommodates learning resources for the Qur’an and Hadith, Ijma’, Qiyas, Istihsan, Istishab, Maslahah Mursalah, ‘Urf, and some under the context of the Fiqh learning material. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信