大西洋世界的咖啡馆文化,1650-1789,

IF 0.5 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
Simon Smith
{"title":"大西洋世界的咖啡馆文化,1650-1789,","authors":"Simon Smith","doi":"10.1080/14780038.2023.2189414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"studies ranging from the American colonies, the Caribbean, Africa, and India, the treatment of each is quite uneven and seemingly comes at the cost of a more wholistic treatment of ‘Britain’ itself. There is very little discussion of Scotland and Wales and the question of Ireland’s place within the empire and its incorporation into the domestic state after 1801 goes almost unnoticed. This seems something of a missed opportunity in a work discussing the interconnections between the domestic and imperial, particularly if one considers the extent to which the British state relied on the Irish establishment for the provision of pensions and sinecures. Readers of this journal will no doubt be pleased with the very broad conception of corruption adopted by Knights. Not only does he pay a substantial amount of attention to the religious and moral origins of the term and their continued resonance, he also highlights the extent to which discussions of corruption were both shaped by and helped to shape broader cultural conventions, such as the division between public and private and the ways in which officeholding and its emoluments were bound up in what Paul Langford called the ‘propertied mind’ of the eighteenth-century British elite. In Trust & Distrust, Knights has produced a work of significant importance and breadth, one which deserves to be read by historians and non-historians alike with an interest in the politics and culture of early modern Britain and its empire.","PeriodicalId":45240,"journal":{"name":"Cultural & Social History","volume":"20 1","pages":"293 - 295"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coffeehouse Culture in the Atlantic World, 1650-1789,\",\"authors\":\"Simon Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14780038.2023.2189414\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"studies ranging from the American colonies, the Caribbean, Africa, and India, the treatment of each is quite uneven and seemingly comes at the cost of a more wholistic treatment of ‘Britain’ itself. There is very little discussion of Scotland and Wales and the question of Ireland’s place within the empire and its incorporation into the domestic state after 1801 goes almost unnoticed. This seems something of a missed opportunity in a work discussing the interconnections between the domestic and imperial, particularly if one considers the extent to which the British state relied on the Irish establishment for the provision of pensions and sinecures. Readers of this journal will no doubt be pleased with the very broad conception of corruption adopted by Knights. Not only does he pay a substantial amount of attention to the religious and moral origins of the term and their continued resonance, he also highlights the extent to which discussions of corruption were both shaped by and helped to shape broader cultural conventions, such as the division between public and private and the ways in which officeholding and its emoluments were bound up in what Paul Langford called the ‘propertied mind’ of the eighteenth-century British elite. In Trust & Distrust, Knights has produced a work of significant importance and breadth, one which deserves to be read by historians and non-historians alike with an interest in the politics and culture of early modern Britain and its empire.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cultural & Social History\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"293 - 295\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cultural & Social History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14780038.2023.2189414\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural & Social History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14780038.2023.2189414","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从美国殖民地、加勒比海、非洲和印度的研究来看,每一项研究的处理都相当不均衡,似乎是以对“英国”本身进行更全面的处理为代价的。关于苏格兰和威尔士的讨论很少,爱尔兰在帝国中的地位及其在1801年后并入国内的问题几乎没有被注意到。在一部讨论国内和帝国之间相互联系的作品中,这似乎错过了一个机会,尤其是如果考虑到英国政府在多大程度上依赖爱尔兰政府提供养老金和闲职的话。毫无疑问,这本杂志的读者会对Knights采用的非常宽泛的腐败概念感到满意。他不仅对这个词的宗教和道德起源及其持续的共鸣给予了大量关注,还强调了腐败问题的讨论在多大程度上受到了更广泛的文化习俗的影响,并有助于形成更广泛的传统,比如公共和私人之间的划分,以及职位及其薪酬与保罗·兰福德所说的18世纪英国精英的“财产头脑”之间的联系。在《信任与不信任》一书中,奈特创作了一部具有重要意义和广度的作品,值得对现代早期英国及其帝国的政治和文化感兴趣的历史学家和非历史学家阅读。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Coffeehouse Culture in the Atlantic World, 1650-1789,
studies ranging from the American colonies, the Caribbean, Africa, and India, the treatment of each is quite uneven and seemingly comes at the cost of a more wholistic treatment of ‘Britain’ itself. There is very little discussion of Scotland and Wales and the question of Ireland’s place within the empire and its incorporation into the domestic state after 1801 goes almost unnoticed. This seems something of a missed opportunity in a work discussing the interconnections between the domestic and imperial, particularly if one considers the extent to which the British state relied on the Irish establishment for the provision of pensions and sinecures. Readers of this journal will no doubt be pleased with the very broad conception of corruption adopted by Knights. Not only does he pay a substantial amount of attention to the religious and moral origins of the term and their continued resonance, he also highlights the extent to which discussions of corruption were both shaped by and helped to shape broader cultural conventions, such as the division between public and private and the ways in which officeholding and its emoluments were bound up in what Paul Langford called the ‘propertied mind’ of the eighteenth-century British elite. In Trust & Distrust, Knights has produced a work of significant importance and breadth, one which deserves to be read by historians and non-historians alike with an interest in the politics and culture of early modern Britain and its empire.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: Cultural & Social History is published on behalf of the Social History Society (SHS). Members receive the journal as part of their membership package. To join the Society, please download an application form on the Society"s website and follow the instructions provided.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信