基于PCR、信号扩增指导适当筛查间隔的HPV自采样检测风险评估:中国的一项前瞻性研究

IF 7.6 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Xuelian Zhao , Shangying Hu , Shuang Zhao , Remila Rezhake , Liuye Huang , Xianzhi Duan , Xun Zhang , Youlin Qiao , Marc Arbyn , Fanghui Zhao
{"title":"基于PCR、信号扩增指导适当筛查间隔的HPV自采样检测风险评估:中国的一项前瞻性研究","authors":"Xuelian Zhao ,&nbsp;Shangying Hu ,&nbsp;Shuang Zhao ,&nbsp;Remila Rezhake ,&nbsp;Liuye Huang ,&nbsp;Xianzhi Duan ,&nbsp;Xun Zhang ,&nbsp;Youlin Qiao ,&nbsp;Marc Arbyn ,&nbsp;Fanghui Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.jncc.2022.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>We assessed the longitudinal risk of developing cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CINs) with self-sampling human papillomavirus (HPV) tests, based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and signal amplification (<em>care</em>HPV), to explore the appropriate intervals for cervical cancer screening.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A prospective study was conducted in China during 2017–2020. Participants were invited for PCR and <em>care</em>HPV tests with self-samples at baseline. Women positive in either HPV test underwent colposcopy and biopsy if necessary. Women with baseline CIN grade one (CIN1) or less were followed up over 3 years. The absolute risk was assessed by the immediate risk (IR) and cumulative risk (CR), and the relative risk was assessed by the hazard ratio (HR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 8,126 women were included in the final analysis. Women positive for the PCR HPV test had comparable IRs of CIN2+ and CIN3+ to those positive on the <em>care</em>HPV test. With triage by HPV genotyping, women with HPV 16/18 infection had the highest IRs of CIN2+ (21.15%) and CIN3+ (9.67%). For CR, women negative for PCR HPV test had a lower risk of CIN2+ than that reported in women negative on <em>care</em>HPV test (0.57% versus 0.98%, HR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.38, 0.87), but no significant difference was found in the CRs of CIN3+ between them (0.25% versus 0.39%, HR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.34, 1.20). Among women with CIN1 or less at baseline, women who were persistent or recurrent positive on <em>care</em>HPV or PCR HPV test had a higher risk of developing CIN3+ (11.36%-14.59%), compared with women remained HPV negative from baseline throughout follow-up (≤0.28%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Routine screening with 3-year intervals is acceptable for self-sampling HPV tests based on PCR or <em>care</em>HPV test. Women positive on HPV16/18 triaging at baseline or with CIN1 or less at baseline while being persistent or recurrent positive on <em>care</em>HPV or PCR HPV test during 3-year follow-up require immediate colposcopy or treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73987,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Center","volume":"2 4","pages":"Pages 298-305"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667005422000564/pdfft?md5=6182765ecc8bc681a245c4f1647b6917&pid=1-s2.0-S2667005422000564-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk assessment of self-sampling HPV tests based on PCR, signal amplification to guide the appropriate screening intervals: A prospective study in China\",\"authors\":\"Xuelian Zhao ,&nbsp;Shangying Hu ,&nbsp;Shuang Zhao ,&nbsp;Remila Rezhake ,&nbsp;Liuye Huang ,&nbsp;Xianzhi Duan ,&nbsp;Xun Zhang ,&nbsp;Youlin Qiao ,&nbsp;Marc Arbyn ,&nbsp;Fanghui Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jncc.2022.08.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>We assessed the longitudinal risk of developing cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CINs) with self-sampling human papillomavirus (HPV) tests, based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and signal amplification (<em>care</em>HPV), to explore the appropriate intervals for cervical cancer screening.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A prospective study was conducted in China during 2017–2020. Participants were invited for PCR and <em>care</em>HPV tests with self-samples at baseline. Women positive in either HPV test underwent colposcopy and biopsy if necessary. Women with baseline CIN grade one (CIN1) or less were followed up over 3 years. The absolute risk was assessed by the immediate risk (IR) and cumulative risk (CR), and the relative risk was assessed by the hazard ratio (HR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 8,126 women were included in the final analysis. Women positive for the PCR HPV test had comparable IRs of CIN2+ and CIN3+ to those positive on the <em>care</em>HPV test. With triage by HPV genotyping, women with HPV 16/18 infection had the highest IRs of CIN2+ (21.15%) and CIN3+ (9.67%). For CR, women negative for PCR HPV test had a lower risk of CIN2+ than that reported in women negative on <em>care</em>HPV test (0.57% versus 0.98%, HR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.38, 0.87), but no significant difference was found in the CRs of CIN3+ between them (0.25% versus 0.39%, HR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.34, 1.20). Among women with CIN1 or less at baseline, women who were persistent or recurrent positive on <em>care</em>HPV or PCR HPV test had a higher risk of developing CIN3+ (11.36%-14.59%), compared with women remained HPV negative from baseline throughout follow-up (≤0.28%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Routine screening with 3-year intervals is acceptable for self-sampling HPV tests based on PCR or <em>care</em>HPV test. Women positive on HPV16/18 triaging at baseline or with CIN1 or less at baseline while being persistent or recurrent positive on <em>care</em>HPV or PCR HPV test during 3-year follow-up require immediate colposcopy or treatment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73987,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the National Cancer Center\",\"volume\":\"2 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 298-305\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667005422000564/pdfft?md5=6182765ecc8bc681a245c4f1647b6917&pid=1-s2.0-S2667005422000564-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the National Cancer Center\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667005422000564\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Cancer Center","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667005422000564","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的采用聚合酶链反应(PCR)和信号扩增(careHPV)技术,对自取样人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)检测进行宫颈上皮内瘤变(CINs)的纵向风险评估,探讨宫颈癌筛查的适宜间隔。方法2017-2020年在中国进行前瞻性研究。邀请参与者在基线时进行PCR和careHPV检测。HPV检测阳性的妇女在必要时接受阴道镜检查和活检。基线CIN1级(CIN1)或更低的妇女随访3年以上。绝对危险度采用即时危险度(IR)和累积危险度(CR)评估,相对危险度采用危险度比(HR)评估,置信区间为95%。结果共纳入8126名女性。PCR HPV检测阳性的妇女CIN2+和CIN3+的IRs与careHPV检测阳性的妇女相当。通过HPV基因分型分类,HPV 16/18感染的女性CIN2+(21.15%)和CIN3+(9.67%)的IRs最高。对于CR, PCR HPV检测阴性的女性CIN2+的风险低于careHPV检测阴性的女性(0.57%对0.98%,HR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.38, 0.87),但两者之间CIN3+的CR无显著差异(0.25%对0.39%,HR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.34, 1.20)。在基线时CIN1或更少的女性中,持续或复发的careHPV或PCR HPV检测阳性的女性发生CIN3+的风险更高(11.36%-14.59%),而在整个随访期间从基线开始HPV阴性的女性(≤0.28%)。结论基于PCR或careHPV检测的自采样HPV检测可接受3年的常规筛查。在基线时HPV16/18分诊呈阳性或基线时CIN1或更低,而在3年随访期间持续或复发的careHPV或PCR HPV检测呈阳性的妇女需要立即阴道镜检查或治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk assessment of self-sampling HPV tests based on PCR, signal amplification to guide the appropriate screening intervals: A prospective study in China

Objective

We assessed the longitudinal risk of developing cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CINs) with self-sampling human papillomavirus (HPV) tests, based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and signal amplification (careHPV), to explore the appropriate intervals for cervical cancer screening.

Methods

A prospective study was conducted in China during 2017–2020. Participants were invited for PCR and careHPV tests with self-samples at baseline. Women positive in either HPV test underwent colposcopy and biopsy if necessary. Women with baseline CIN grade one (CIN1) or less were followed up over 3 years. The absolute risk was assessed by the immediate risk (IR) and cumulative risk (CR), and the relative risk was assessed by the hazard ratio (HR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results

A total of 8,126 women were included in the final analysis. Women positive for the PCR HPV test had comparable IRs of CIN2+ and CIN3+ to those positive on the careHPV test. With triage by HPV genotyping, women with HPV 16/18 infection had the highest IRs of CIN2+ (21.15%) and CIN3+ (9.67%). For CR, women negative for PCR HPV test had a lower risk of CIN2+ than that reported in women negative on careHPV test (0.57% versus 0.98%, HR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.38, 0.87), but no significant difference was found in the CRs of CIN3+ between them (0.25% versus 0.39%, HR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.34, 1.20). Among women with CIN1 or less at baseline, women who were persistent or recurrent positive on careHPV or PCR HPV test had a higher risk of developing CIN3+ (11.36%-14.59%), compared with women remained HPV negative from baseline throughout follow-up (≤0.28%).

Conclusions

Routine screening with 3-year intervals is acceptable for self-sampling HPV tests based on PCR or careHPV test. Women positive on HPV16/18 triaging at baseline or with CIN1 or less at baseline while being persistent or recurrent positive on careHPV or PCR HPV test during 3-year follow-up require immediate colposcopy or treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
70 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信