中英大学评估实践

Wei Guo
{"title":"中英大学评估实践","authors":"Wei Guo","doi":"10.30564/ret.v5i4.5303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As an institution, Xi’an Jiaotong Liverpool University (XJTLU) is unique in China. It is the only Chinese institution that awards students both UK degree and Chinese degree, so it has two sets of control, one of which is to meet all the requirements of the UK Higher Education (HE) standards and the other is to go through all the requirements of Chinese degree awarding powers. Due to its specific relationship with University of Liverpool (UoL), XJTLU is also under close scrutiny from UoL. All of these are reflected in the XJTLU internal and external Quality Assurance (QA) frameworks and procedures. This article focuses on describing and analysing how XJTLU monitors the teaching and assessment processes to meet the UK HE QA standards. Generally, the monitoring system is robust and multidimensional, involving students and peers as observers/reviewers. To understand students’ perspectives on the teaching quality and their learning experience, the university provides official channels for students to provide ratings and/ or qualitative comments on modules and instructors at the middle and the end of semester, while module instructors are expected to do reflection and revision of their teaching accordingly. In addition to that, each module instructor has to observe a peer’s class annually and engage in dialogues with the peer reviewer before and after the observation. To ensure the quality of assessment tasks and marking standards, module leaders have to actively communicate with internal moderators, UoL moderators and external moderators in the Assessment Preparation Review (APR) and Marking Moderation Review (MMR) processes. In general, the evaluation practice of teaching and assessment plays an important role in ensuring the educational quality is maintained and enhanced at XJTLU and is comparable with international best practice. So far, many disciplines at the university have been certified by international professional organizations,which strengthens the university’s global positioning, and directly improves the competitiveness of graduates in the global job market. The author hopes to provide some insights of the QA practice at XJTLU to help teachers and education administrators in different contexts to understand the benefits and progress to be made in terms of teaching and assessment evaluation to ensure the high quality of student training. ","PeriodicalId":69138,"journal":{"name":"教育理论综述(英文)","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Evaluation Practice at a Sino-British University\",\"authors\":\"Wei Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.30564/ret.v5i4.5303\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As an institution, Xi’an Jiaotong Liverpool University (XJTLU) is unique in China. It is the only Chinese institution that awards students both UK degree and Chinese degree, so it has two sets of control, one of which is to meet all the requirements of the UK Higher Education (HE) standards and the other is to go through all the requirements of Chinese degree awarding powers. Due to its specific relationship with University of Liverpool (UoL), XJTLU is also under close scrutiny from UoL. All of these are reflected in the XJTLU internal and external Quality Assurance (QA) frameworks and procedures. This article focuses on describing and analysing how XJTLU monitors the teaching and assessment processes to meet the UK HE QA standards. Generally, the monitoring system is robust and multidimensional, involving students and peers as observers/reviewers. To understand students’ perspectives on the teaching quality and their learning experience, the university provides official channels for students to provide ratings and/ or qualitative comments on modules and instructors at the middle and the end of semester, while module instructors are expected to do reflection and revision of their teaching accordingly. In addition to that, each module instructor has to observe a peer’s class annually and engage in dialogues with the peer reviewer before and after the observation. To ensure the quality of assessment tasks and marking standards, module leaders have to actively communicate with internal moderators, UoL moderators and external moderators in the Assessment Preparation Review (APR) and Marking Moderation Review (MMR) processes. In general, the evaluation practice of teaching and assessment plays an important role in ensuring the educational quality is maintained and enhanced at XJTLU and is comparable with international best practice. So far, many disciplines at the university have been certified by international professional organizations,which strengthens the university’s global positioning, and directly improves the competitiveness of graduates in the global job market. The author hopes to provide some insights of the QA practice at XJTLU to help teachers and education administrators in different contexts to understand the benefits and progress to be made in terms of teaching and assessment evaluation to ensure the high quality of student training. \",\"PeriodicalId\":69138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"教育理论综述(英文)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"教育理论综述(英文)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30564/ret.v5i4.5303\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"教育理论综述(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30564/ret.v5i4.5303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为一所高校,西安交通利物浦大学在中国是独一无二的。它是唯一一所同时授予英国学位和中国学位的中国机构,因此它有两套控制措施,一套是满足英国高等教育(HE)标准的所有要求,另一套是通过中国学位授予权的所有要求。由于其与利物浦大学(UoL)的特殊关系,XJTLU也受到了UoL的密切关注。所有这些都反映在联合特遣部队内部和外部质量保证(QA)框架和程序中。本文重点描述和分析了XJTLU如何监控教学和评估过程,以满足英国高等教育质量保证标准。一般来说,监测系统是健全和多层面的,包括学生和同行作为观察员/审查员。为了了解学生对教学质量和学习体验的看法,大学为学生提供了官方渠道,让他们在学期中和学期末对模块和讲师进行评分和/或定性评论,而模块讲师则应相应地对其教学进行反思和修订。除此之外,每个模块讲师必须每年观察一次同行的课堂,并在观察前后与同行评审员进行对话。为了确保评估任务的质量和评分标准,模块负责人必须在评估准备审查(APR)和评分审查(MMR)过程中与内部主持人、UoL主持人和外部主持人积极沟通。总的来说,教学和评估的评估实践在确保XJTLU保持和提高教育质量方面发挥着重要作用,并与国际最佳实践相媲美。到目前为止,该校的许多学科都获得了国际专业组织的认证,这加强了该校的全球定位,直接提高了毕业生在全球就业市场上的竞争力。作者希望提供一些关于新疆交通大学QA实践的见解,以帮助不同背景下的教师和教育管理人员了解在教学和评估评估方面的好处和进展,从而确保学生培训的高质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Evaluation Practice at a Sino-British University
As an institution, Xi’an Jiaotong Liverpool University (XJTLU) is unique in China. It is the only Chinese institution that awards students both UK degree and Chinese degree, so it has two sets of control, one of which is to meet all the requirements of the UK Higher Education (HE) standards and the other is to go through all the requirements of Chinese degree awarding powers. Due to its specific relationship with University of Liverpool (UoL), XJTLU is also under close scrutiny from UoL. All of these are reflected in the XJTLU internal and external Quality Assurance (QA) frameworks and procedures. This article focuses on describing and analysing how XJTLU monitors the teaching and assessment processes to meet the UK HE QA standards. Generally, the monitoring system is robust and multidimensional, involving students and peers as observers/reviewers. To understand students’ perspectives on the teaching quality and their learning experience, the university provides official channels for students to provide ratings and/ or qualitative comments on modules and instructors at the middle and the end of semester, while module instructors are expected to do reflection and revision of their teaching accordingly. In addition to that, each module instructor has to observe a peer’s class annually and engage in dialogues with the peer reviewer before and after the observation. To ensure the quality of assessment tasks and marking standards, module leaders have to actively communicate with internal moderators, UoL moderators and external moderators in the Assessment Preparation Review (APR) and Marking Moderation Review (MMR) processes. In general, the evaluation practice of teaching and assessment plays an important role in ensuring the educational quality is maintained and enhanced at XJTLU and is comparable with international best practice. So far, many disciplines at the university have been certified by international professional organizations,which strengthens the university’s global positioning, and directly improves the competitiveness of graduates in the global job market. The author hopes to provide some insights of the QA practice at XJTLU to help teachers and education administrators in different contexts to understand the benefits and progress to be made in terms of teaching and assessment evaluation to ensure the high quality of student training. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
145
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信