俄罗斯不是帝国,波兰才是:勒多恩对波兰立陶宛边境的看法

IF 0.2 4区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY
B. Skinner
{"title":"俄罗斯不是帝国,波兰才是:勒多恩对波兰立陶宛边境的看法","authors":"B. Skinner","doi":"10.30965/18763316-12340020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis review of John P. LeDonne’s Forging a Unitary State: Russia’s Management of the Eurasian Space 1650–1850 recognizes the author’s monumental effort to trace Russian civil, military, judicial, fiscal, economic, religious and educational policies and institutions that bound the Eurasian landmass in a Russian “unitary state” but criticizes his heavy-handed treatment of the Polish-Lithuanian lands gained by Russian during the partitions of Poland in 1772, 1793, and 1795. Admitting the complexity of this frontier, LeDonne nevertheless makes little effort to move beyond a stereotypical anti-Polish (and anti-Catholic) perspective on this history, particularly regarding its religious and educational developments. The bold argument of a Russian “unitary state” across Eurasia elides too many complexities and vulnerabilities in this western/southern frontier to be convincing.","PeriodicalId":43441,"journal":{"name":"RUSSIAN HISTORY-HISTOIRE RUSSE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Russia Was Not an Empire, Poland Was: LeDonne’s Perspective on the Polish-Lithuanian Borderlands\",\"authors\":\"B. Skinner\",\"doi\":\"10.30965/18763316-12340020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThis review of John P. LeDonne’s Forging a Unitary State: Russia’s Management of the Eurasian Space 1650–1850 recognizes the author’s monumental effort to trace Russian civil, military, judicial, fiscal, economic, religious and educational policies and institutions that bound the Eurasian landmass in a Russian “unitary state” but criticizes his heavy-handed treatment of the Polish-Lithuanian lands gained by Russian during the partitions of Poland in 1772, 1793, and 1795. Admitting the complexity of this frontier, LeDonne nevertheless makes little effort to move beyond a stereotypical anti-Polish (and anti-Catholic) perspective on this history, particularly regarding its religious and educational developments. The bold argument of a Russian “unitary state” across Eurasia elides too many complexities and vulnerabilities in this western/southern frontier to be convincing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RUSSIAN HISTORY-HISTOIRE RUSSE\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RUSSIAN HISTORY-HISTOIRE RUSSE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30965/18763316-12340020\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RUSSIAN HISTORY-HISTOIRE RUSSE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30965/18763316-12340020","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对约翰·p·勒多恩的《锻造一个统一的国家:1650-1850年俄罗斯对欧亚空间的管理》一书进行了回顾,承认作者在追溯俄罗斯的民事、军事、司法、财政、经济、宗教和教育政策和制度方面所做的巨大努力,这些政策和制度将欧亚大陆束缚在一个俄罗斯的“统一国家”中,但批评他对俄罗斯在1772年、1793年和1795年瓜分波兰期间获得的波兰立陶宛土地的粗暴处理。尽管承认这片疆域的复杂性,LeDonne仍然没有努力超越对这段历史的刻板反波兰(和反天主教)观点,特别是在宗教和教育发展方面。一个横跨欧亚大陆的俄罗斯“统一国家”的大胆论点忽略了这一西部/南部边境的太多复杂性和脆弱性,难以令人信服。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Russia Was Not an Empire, Poland Was: LeDonne’s Perspective on the Polish-Lithuanian Borderlands
This review of John P. LeDonne’s Forging a Unitary State: Russia’s Management of the Eurasian Space 1650–1850 recognizes the author’s monumental effort to trace Russian civil, military, judicial, fiscal, economic, religious and educational policies and institutions that bound the Eurasian landmass in a Russian “unitary state” but criticizes his heavy-handed treatment of the Polish-Lithuanian lands gained by Russian during the partitions of Poland in 1772, 1793, and 1795. Admitting the complexity of this frontier, LeDonne nevertheless makes little effort to move beyond a stereotypical anti-Polish (and anti-Catholic) perspective on this history, particularly regarding its religious and educational developments. The bold argument of a Russian “unitary state” across Eurasia elides too many complexities and vulnerabilities in this western/southern frontier to be convincing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Russian History’s mission is the publication of original articles on the history of Russia through the centuries, in the assumption that all past experiences are inter-related. Russian History seeks to discover, analyze, and understand the most interesting experiences and relationships and elucidate their causes and consequences. Contributors to the journal take their stand from different perspectives: intellectual, economic and military history, domestic, social and class relations, relations with non-Russian peoples, nutrition and health, all possible events that had an influence on Russia. Russian History is the international platform for the presentation of such findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信