白人性别政治:白人民族主义和宗教权利中的父权家庭

IF 1.6 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Sophie Bjork‐James
{"title":"白人性别政治:白人民族主义和宗教权利中的父权家庭","authors":"Sophie Bjork‐James","doi":"10.1111/traa.12167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, I explore how the US‐based Religious Right and white nationalist movements are both organized around a similar politics of gender rooted in defending the patriarchal family. While the broader meanings of the family differ in each framework—either providing the foundation for the racial nation or the religious order—there is surprising agreement across these movements around understanding the family as a heterosexual and patriarchal institution that is under attack. Based on long‐term ethnographic research in both movements, I show how defending the heteropatriarchal family provides valorized gendered identities for their participants along with a moral justification for prejudice, particularly through a discourse of defending women and children from feminism and queerness. This analysis shows how contemporary right‐wing and authoritarian movements rally around this family—modern, classed and raced, and patriarchal—as an anchor of stability in a time of increasing economic and social change.","PeriodicalId":44069,"journal":{"name":"Transforming Anthropology","volume":"28 1","pages":"58 - 73"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/traa.12167","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"White Sexual Politics: The Patriarchal Family in White Nationalism and the Religious Right\",\"authors\":\"Sophie Bjork‐James\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/traa.12167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, I explore how the US‐based Religious Right and white nationalist movements are both organized around a similar politics of gender rooted in defending the patriarchal family. While the broader meanings of the family differ in each framework—either providing the foundation for the racial nation or the religious order—there is surprising agreement across these movements around understanding the family as a heterosexual and patriarchal institution that is under attack. Based on long‐term ethnographic research in both movements, I show how defending the heteropatriarchal family provides valorized gendered identities for their participants along with a moral justification for prejudice, particularly through a discourse of defending women and children from feminism and queerness. This analysis shows how contemporary right‐wing and authoritarian movements rally around this family—modern, classed and raced, and patriarchal—as an anchor of stability in a time of increasing economic and social change.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transforming Anthropology\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"58 - 73\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/traa.12167\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transforming Anthropology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/traa.12167\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transforming Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/traa.12167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

在本文中,我探讨了以美国为基础的宗教权利运动和白人民族主义运动是如何围绕植根于捍卫父权制家庭的类似性别政治组织起来的。虽然在每个框架中,家庭的更广泛意义有所不同——要么是为种族国家提供基础,要么是为宗教秩序提供基础——但在这些运动中,人们对家庭作为受到攻击的异性恋和父权制度的理解却令人惊讶地一致。基于对这两个运动的长期人种学研究,我展示了捍卫异性父系家庭如何为参与者提供了稳定的性别身份,以及偏见的道德辩护,特别是通过保护妇女和儿童免受女权主义和酷儿的论述。这一分析表明,当代右翼和威权主义运动是如何围绕这个家庭展开的——现代的、阶级的、种族的、父权制的——在经济和社会不断变化的时代,它是稳定的锚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
White Sexual Politics: The Patriarchal Family in White Nationalism and the Religious Right
In this paper, I explore how the US‐based Religious Right and white nationalist movements are both organized around a similar politics of gender rooted in defending the patriarchal family. While the broader meanings of the family differ in each framework—either providing the foundation for the racial nation or the religious order—there is surprising agreement across these movements around understanding the family as a heterosexual and patriarchal institution that is under attack. Based on long‐term ethnographic research in both movements, I show how defending the heteropatriarchal family provides valorized gendered identities for their participants along with a moral justification for prejudice, particularly through a discourse of defending women and children from feminism and queerness. This analysis shows how contemporary right‐wing and authoritarian movements rally around this family—modern, classed and raced, and patriarchal—as an anchor of stability in a time of increasing economic and social change.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信