CLCS面前最具争议的划界案：参考2019年马来西亚划界案

IF 1.3 3区社会学 Q1 LAW

International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law Pub Date : 2022-03-28 DOI:10.1163/15718085-bja10090

M. Gau

{"title":"CLCS面前最具争议的划界案：参考2019年马来西亚划界案","authors":"M. Gau","doi":"10.1163/15718085-bja10090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In December 2019 Malaysia submitted information on the outer limits of its continental shelf beyond 200 miles (OL) in the South China Sea (SCS) to the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf (CLCS). According to Article 76(8) of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, Malaysia shall seek CLCS recommendations as the basis for establishing its OL. If notified of a land or maritime dispute, the CLCS shall not consider the submission unless consent is given by all disputants. As of 16 March 2022, the CLCS has received 28 note verbales (NVs) concerning Malaysia’s submission. Apart from those challenging the submission, there are 12 NVs invoking the 2016 SCS Arbitration award to oppose territorial and maritime claims by China in its NVs initially objecting the submission. This article reviews relevant CLCS rules and practice, analyses all 28 NVs, and examines the disputes reflected in the NVs.","PeriodicalId":45173,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Most Controversial Submission before the CLCS: With Reference to the 2019 Malaysia Submission\",\"authors\":\"M. Gau\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15718085-bja10090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n In December 2019 Malaysia submitted information on the outer limits of its continental shelf beyond 200 miles (OL) in the South China Sea (SCS) to the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf (CLCS). According to Article 76(8) of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, Malaysia shall seek CLCS recommendations as the basis for establishing its OL. If notified of a land or maritime dispute, the CLCS shall not consider the submission unless consent is given by all disputants. As of 16 March 2022, the CLCS has received 28 note verbales (NVs) concerning Malaysia’s submission. Apart from those challenging the submission, there are 12 NVs invoking the 2016 SCS Arbitration award to oppose territorial and maritime claims by China in its NVs initially objecting the submission. This article reviews relevant CLCS rules and practice, analyses all 28 NVs, and examines the disputes reflected in the NVs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718085-bja10090\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718085-bja10090","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

2019年12月，马来西亚向大陆架界限委员会提交了关于其南中国海200英里以外大陆架外部界限的信息。根据《联合国海洋法公约》第76条第（8）款，马来西亚应寻求CLCS的建议，作为建立其OL的基础。如果收到关于陆地或海洋争端的通知，CLCS不应考虑划界案，除非所有争端方同意。截至2022年3月16日，CLCS已收到28份关于马来西亚提交的普通照会。除了对提交的文件提出质疑外，还有12个NV援引2016年SCS仲裁裁决，反对中国在最初反对提交的NV中提出的领土和海洋索赔。本文回顾了CLCS的相关规则和实践，分析了所有28个NV，并考察了NV中反映的争议。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Most Controversial Submission before the CLCS: With Reference to the 2019 Malaysia Submission

In December 2019 Malaysia submitted information on the outer limits of its continental shelf beyond 200 miles (OL) in the South China Sea (SCS) to the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf (CLCS). According to Article 76(8) of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, Malaysia shall seek CLCS recommendations as the basis for establishing its OL. If notified of a land or maritime dispute, the CLCS shall not consider the submission unless consent is given by all disputants. As of 16 March 2022, the CLCS has received 28 note verbales (NVs) concerning Malaysia’s submission. Apart from those challenging the submission, there are 12 NVs invoking the 2016 SCS Arbitration award to oppose territorial and maritime claims by China in its NVs initially objecting the submission. This article reviews relevant CLCS rules and practice, analyses all 28 NVs, and examines the disputes reflected in the NVs.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law LAW-

CiteScore

2.20

自引率

15.40%

发文量

期刊介绍： The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law addresses all aspects of marine and coastal law. In addition to normal in-depth scholarly articles, the Journal contains a distinctive feature: a vigorous ‘Current Legal Developments’ section which provides notes and commentary on international treaties and case law, national statute law, national court decisions, and other aspects of state practice; includes the relevant original documentation where appropriate; and monitors developments in relevant international organizations at a global and regional level. The format also includes a book review section.