可持续发展目标是否改变了大学转向效果和变化深度分析

IF 4.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Andrea Cuesta-Claros, Shirin Malekpour, Rob Raven, Tahl Kestin
{"title":"可持续发展目标是否改变了大学转向效果和变化深度分析","authors":"Andrea Cuesta-Claros,&nbsp;Shirin Malekpour,&nbsp;Rob Raven,&nbsp;Tahl Kestin","doi":"10.1016/j.esg.2023.100186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Universities are increasingly engaging with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Appeal for the SDGs is partly based on their double transformation framing: they are seen as enablers of societal transformations and transformations within universities. This article aims to understand how the SDGs influence university transformations. We analyse how four universities have integrated the SDGs through a comparative case study. We propose a framework to determine the impact of the SDGs in universities by identifying their scope of change (i.e. discursive, institutional, relational, and resource effects) and depth of change (i.e. accommodative, reformative or transformative). This study shows that discursive effects are the most prominent hinting toward transformative change. To lesser extents, primarily accommodative, the SDGs have influenced institutional, relational, and resource changes. Overall, findings show that for the SDGs to fulfil their transformative potential in universities, they should be used as more than communications and legitimizing tools.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33685,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Governance","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100186"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are the sustainable development goals transforming universities? – An analysis of steering effects and depth of change\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Cuesta-Claros,&nbsp;Shirin Malekpour,&nbsp;Rob Raven,&nbsp;Tahl Kestin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.esg.2023.100186\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Universities are increasingly engaging with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Appeal for the SDGs is partly based on their double transformation framing: they are seen as enablers of societal transformations and transformations within universities. This article aims to understand how the SDGs influence university transformations. We analyse how four universities have integrated the SDGs through a comparative case study. We propose a framework to determine the impact of the SDGs in universities by identifying their scope of change (i.e. discursive, institutional, relational, and resource effects) and depth of change (i.e. accommodative, reformative or transformative). This study shows that discursive effects are the most prominent hinting toward transformative change. To lesser extents, primarily accommodative, the SDGs have influenced institutional, relational, and resource changes. Overall, findings show that for the SDGs to fulfil their transformative potential in universities, they should be used as more than communications and legitimizing tools.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33685,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Earth System Governance\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100186\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Earth System Governance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S258981162300023X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth System Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S258981162300023X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

大学越来越多地参与可持续发展目标(sdg)。可持续发展目标的吸引力部分基于其双重转型框架:它们被视为社会转型和大学内部转型的推动者。本文旨在了解可持续发展目标如何影响大学转型。我们通过比较案例分析了四所大学如何整合可持续发展目标。我们提出了一个框架,通过确定其变化范围(即话语、制度、关系和资源影响)和变化深度(即适应性、改革性或变革性)来确定可持续发展目标对大学的影响。本研究表明,话语效应是转化性变化最显著的暗示。在较小程度上(主要是适应性的),可持续发展目标影响了制度、关系和资源的变化。总体而言,研究结果表明,要使可持续发展目标在大学中发挥其变革潜力,它们不应仅仅被用作沟通和合法化工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are the sustainable development goals transforming universities? – An analysis of steering effects and depth of change

Universities are increasingly engaging with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Appeal for the SDGs is partly based on their double transformation framing: they are seen as enablers of societal transformations and transformations within universities. This article aims to understand how the SDGs influence university transformations. We analyse how four universities have integrated the SDGs through a comparative case study. We propose a framework to determine the impact of the SDGs in universities by identifying their scope of change (i.e. discursive, institutional, relational, and resource effects) and depth of change (i.e. accommodative, reformative or transformative). This study shows that discursive effects are the most prominent hinting toward transformative change. To lesser extents, primarily accommodative, the SDGs have influenced institutional, relational, and resource changes. Overall, findings show that for the SDGs to fulfil their transformative potential in universities, they should be used as more than communications and legitimizing tools.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
31
审稿时长
35 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信