激励承包商投标决策的客户属性

IF 1.9 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
O. Olatunji, C. Ramanayaka
{"title":"激励承包商投标决策的客户属性","authors":"O. Olatunji, C. Ramanayaka","doi":"10.1108/bepam-11-2022-0181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study aims to investigate clients' attributes, their key decision variables and causal relationships between the decision variables. In addition, the purpose of the study is to map-out from these analyses, the attributes of project clients that motivate contractors' bid decision.Design/methodology/approachA total of 50 responses were obtained from a questionnaire survey. 50% of participants are contractors. 44% are claims consultants, whilst 6% are manufacturers and clients. Beyond measures of central tendencies, analysis focussed on causal relationships by way of correlation, analysis of variance and reductionism.FindingsAll 20 factors considered have significant correlations with at least one other factor. Findings also show the factors can be clustered into six: reputation, financial strength, relationship with the bidder, organisational attributes, history with project attributes and project organisation.Practical implicationsEvidence suggests stakeholders have often struggled to consider the many decision factors reported in normative literature, numbering hundreds. By clustering the factors into sub-themes, bid decisioning has been made more efficient. The study also explains how client attributes could determine project success and contractor participation. Different stakeholders can use findings of this study for training and further studies.Originality/valuePrevious studies have considered bid decisioning indexically – factors were long, analyses were largely inconclusive, and causal relationships are orthogonal. Findings in this study have shown depth: 20 originating client-specific factors were clustered into six sub-themes, and correlations were established. The methodology used for the study is confirmatory and conclusive.","PeriodicalId":46426,"journal":{"name":"Built Environment Project and Asset Management","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Client attributes that motivate contractors' bid decision\",\"authors\":\"O. Olatunji, C. Ramanayaka\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/bepam-11-2022-0181\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThis study aims to investigate clients' attributes, their key decision variables and causal relationships between the decision variables. In addition, the purpose of the study is to map-out from these analyses, the attributes of project clients that motivate contractors' bid decision.Design/methodology/approachA total of 50 responses were obtained from a questionnaire survey. 50% of participants are contractors. 44% are claims consultants, whilst 6% are manufacturers and clients. Beyond measures of central tendencies, analysis focussed on causal relationships by way of correlation, analysis of variance and reductionism.FindingsAll 20 factors considered have significant correlations with at least one other factor. Findings also show the factors can be clustered into six: reputation, financial strength, relationship with the bidder, organisational attributes, history with project attributes and project organisation.Practical implicationsEvidence suggests stakeholders have often struggled to consider the many decision factors reported in normative literature, numbering hundreds. By clustering the factors into sub-themes, bid decisioning has been made more efficient. The study also explains how client attributes could determine project success and contractor participation. Different stakeholders can use findings of this study for training and further studies.Originality/valuePrevious studies have considered bid decisioning indexically – factors were long, analyses were largely inconclusive, and causal relationships are orthogonal. Findings in this study have shown depth: 20 originating client-specific factors were clustered into six sub-themes, and correlations were established. The methodology used for the study is confirmatory and conclusive.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46426,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Built Environment Project and Asset Management\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Built Environment Project and Asset Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/bepam-11-2022-0181\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Built Environment Project and Asset Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/bepam-11-2022-0181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究旨在调查客户的属性、关键决策变量以及决策变量之间的因果关系。此外,本研究的目的是从这些分析中找出激励承包商投标决策的项目客户的属性。设计/方法/方法通过问卷调查共获得50份回复。50%的参与者是承包商。44%是索赔顾问,6%是制造商和客户。除了对中心趋势的测量之外,分析还通过相关性、方差分析和还原论的方式关注因果关系。发现所有20个因素都与至少一个其他因素存在显著相关性。调查结果还显示,这些因素可以分为六类:声誉、财务实力、与投标人的关系、组织属性、具有项目属性的历史和项目组织。实际含义有证据表明,利益相关者经常难以考虑规范性文献中报告的数百个决策因素。通过将因素聚类到子主题中,投标决策变得更加有效。该研究还解释了客户属性如何决定项目的成功和承包商的参与。不同的利益相关者可以利用本研究的结果进行培训和进一步研究。原创性/价值先前的研究以指数方式考虑了投标决策——因素很长,分析基本上没有结论,因果关系是正交的。这项研究的结果显示了深度:20个源自客户的特定因素被分为六个子主题,并建立了相关性。该研究所用的方法是证实性和结论性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Client attributes that motivate contractors' bid decision
PurposeThis study aims to investigate clients' attributes, their key decision variables and causal relationships between the decision variables. In addition, the purpose of the study is to map-out from these analyses, the attributes of project clients that motivate contractors' bid decision.Design/methodology/approachA total of 50 responses were obtained from a questionnaire survey. 50% of participants are contractors. 44% are claims consultants, whilst 6% are manufacturers and clients. Beyond measures of central tendencies, analysis focussed on causal relationships by way of correlation, analysis of variance and reductionism.FindingsAll 20 factors considered have significant correlations with at least one other factor. Findings also show the factors can be clustered into six: reputation, financial strength, relationship with the bidder, organisational attributes, history with project attributes and project organisation.Practical implicationsEvidence suggests stakeholders have often struggled to consider the many decision factors reported in normative literature, numbering hundreds. By clustering the factors into sub-themes, bid decisioning has been made more efficient. The study also explains how client attributes could determine project success and contractor participation. Different stakeholders can use findings of this study for training and further studies.Originality/valuePrevious studies have considered bid decisioning indexically – factors were long, analyses were largely inconclusive, and causal relationships are orthogonal. Findings in this study have shown depth: 20 originating client-specific factors were clustered into six sub-themes, and correlations were established. The methodology used for the study is confirmatory and conclusive.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信