{"title":"布鲁诺·拉图尔建构主义的批判性方法","authors":"Daniel Lara de la Fuente","doi":"10.20932/BARATARIA.V0I28.519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is a critical approach to Bruno Latour's philosophy of social sciences. Concretely, it tries yo clarify its antirrealist perspective. First, I explain my realist point of view, based on John Searle, Rusell Keat and John Urry. Second, I want to consider how Latour answers the following questions: 1) how he denies the existence of an external reality and a cognitive agent? 2) In wich measure knowing is also a modification of the studied phenomena?. The conclusion remarks the most important elements to consider for later works","PeriodicalId":40715,"journal":{"name":"Barataria-Revista Castellano-Manchega de Ciencias Sociales","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"APROXIMACIÓN CRÍTICA AL CONSTRUCTIVISMO DE BRUNO LATOUR\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Lara de la Fuente\",\"doi\":\"10.20932/BARATARIA.V0I28.519\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper is a critical approach to Bruno Latour's philosophy of social sciences. Concretely, it tries yo clarify its antirrealist perspective. First, I explain my realist point of view, based on John Searle, Rusell Keat and John Urry. Second, I want to consider how Latour answers the following questions: 1) how he denies the existence of an external reality and a cognitive agent? 2) In wich measure knowing is also a modification of the studied phenomena?. The conclusion remarks the most important elements to consider for later works\",\"PeriodicalId\":40715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Barataria-Revista Castellano-Manchega de Ciencias Sociales\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"1-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Barataria-Revista Castellano-Manchega de Ciencias Sociales\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20932/BARATARIA.V0I28.519\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Barataria-Revista Castellano-Manchega de Ciencias Sociales","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20932/BARATARIA.V0I28.519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
APROXIMACIÓN CRÍTICA AL CONSTRUCTIVISMO DE BRUNO LATOUR
This paper is a critical approach to Bruno Latour's philosophy of social sciences. Concretely, it tries yo clarify its antirrealist perspective. First, I explain my realist point of view, based on John Searle, Rusell Keat and John Urry. Second, I want to consider how Latour answers the following questions: 1) how he denies the existence of an external reality and a cognitive agent? 2) In wich measure knowing is also a modification of the studied phenomena?. The conclusion remarks the most important elements to consider for later works