EXPRESS:揭示和减轻金融服务中的种族偏见和歧视

IF 5.1 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Maura L. Scott, Sterling A. Bone, Glenn L. Christensen, Anneliese Lederer, Martin Mende, Brandon G. Christensen, Marina Cozac
{"title":"EXPRESS:揭示和减轻金融服务中的种族偏见和歧视","authors":"Maura L. Scott, Sterling A. Bone, Glenn L. Christensen, Anneliese Lederer, Martin Mende, Brandon G. Christensen, Marina Cozac","doi":"10.1177/00222437231176470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Three field studies and a laboratory experiment reveal racial discrimination in financial loan services. The results show that (a) service employees provide Black (vs. White) customers with inferior service outcomes (i.e., products offered), (b) Black (vs. White) customers experience inferior service processes (employees’ warmth/competence), and (c) Black (vs. White) customers report lower loyalty intentions toward the firm. Such discrimination is not only morally wrong and illegal, but it is also bad for business. Therefore, the authors also show when and why racial discrimination is mitigated: namely, when Black customers signal higher socioeconomic status, or a Black customer’s company (for which they seek the loan) has a more complex and sophisticated legal structure (corporation vs. sole proprietorship). Exploring this mitigation effect further, the results show that a more sophisticated business structure increases the employee’s trust toward Black customers, which reduces the perceived default likelihood and increases the likelihood to offer a loan; yet, this process does not emerge for White applicants. The findings point to managerial and policy implications to mitigate racial discrimination.","PeriodicalId":48465,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marketing Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EXPRESS: Revealing and Mitigating Racial Bias and Discrimination in Financial Services\",\"authors\":\"Maura L. Scott, Sterling A. Bone, Glenn L. Christensen, Anneliese Lederer, Martin Mende, Brandon G. Christensen, Marina Cozac\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00222437231176470\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Three field studies and a laboratory experiment reveal racial discrimination in financial loan services. The results show that (a) service employees provide Black (vs. White) customers with inferior service outcomes (i.e., products offered), (b) Black (vs. White) customers experience inferior service processes (employees’ warmth/competence), and (c) Black (vs. White) customers report lower loyalty intentions toward the firm. Such discrimination is not only morally wrong and illegal, but it is also bad for business. Therefore, the authors also show when and why racial discrimination is mitigated: namely, when Black customers signal higher socioeconomic status, or a Black customer’s company (for which they seek the loan) has a more complex and sophisticated legal structure (corporation vs. sole proprietorship). Exploring this mitigation effect further, the results show that a more sophisticated business structure increases the employee’s trust toward Black customers, which reduces the perceived default likelihood and increases the likelihood to offer a loan; yet, this process does not emerge for White applicants. The findings point to managerial and policy implications to mitigate racial discrimination.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Marketing Research\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Marketing Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222437231176470\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marketing Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222437231176470","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

三项实地研究和一项实验室实验揭示了金融贷款服务中的种族歧视。结果表明,(a)服务员工为黑人(相对于白人)客户提供了较差的服务结果(即所提供的产品),(b)黑人(相对于白色)客户体验到较差的服务流程(员工的热情/能力),以及(c)黑人(与白色)客户报告对公司的忠诚度较低。这种歧视不仅在道德上是错误和非法的,而且对商业也不利。因此,作者还展示了种族歧视何时以及为什么得到缓解:即,当黑人客户表示社会经济地位更高,或者黑人客户的公司(他们寻求贷款的公司)有更复杂和复杂的法律结构(公司与独资企业)时。进一步探讨这种缓解效应,结果表明,更复杂的业务结构增加了员工对黑人客户的信任,从而降低了感知到的违约可能性,增加了提供贷款的可能性;然而,这一过程并没有出现在白人申请人身上。调查结果指出了减轻种族歧视的管理和政策影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EXPRESS: Revealing and Mitigating Racial Bias and Discrimination in Financial Services
Three field studies and a laboratory experiment reveal racial discrimination in financial loan services. The results show that (a) service employees provide Black (vs. White) customers with inferior service outcomes (i.e., products offered), (b) Black (vs. White) customers experience inferior service processes (employees’ warmth/competence), and (c) Black (vs. White) customers report lower loyalty intentions toward the firm. Such discrimination is not only morally wrong and illegal, but it is also bad for business. Therefore, the authors also show when and why racial discrimination is mitigated: namely, when Black customers signal higher socioeconomic status, or a Black customer’s company (for which they seek the loan) has a more complex and sophisticated legal structure (corporation vs. sole proprietorship). Exploring this mitigation effect further, the results show that a more sophisticated business structure increases the employee’s trust toward Black customers, which reduces the perceived default likelihood and increases the likelihood to offer a loan; yet, this process does not emerge for White applicants. The findings point to managerial and policy implications to mitigate racial discrimination.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
6.60%
发文量
79
期刊介绍: JMR is written for those academics and practitioners of marketing research who need to be in the forefront of the profession and in possession of the industry"s cutting-edge information. JMR publishes articles representing the entire spectrum of research in marketing. The editorial content is peer-reviewed by an expert panel of leading academics. Articles address the concepts, methods, and applications of marketing research that present new techniques for solving marketing problems; contribute to marketing knowledge based on the use of experimental, descriptive, or analytical techniques; and review and comment on the developments and concepts in related fields that have a bearing on the research industry and its practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信