James L. Thomas, A. Kopiec, K. Mark, L. Mae Chandler
{"title":"标准化人群中Lisfranc离散的x线摄影价值","authors":"James L. Thomas, A. Kopiec, K. Mark, L. Mae Chandler","doi":"10.1177/1938640019890738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Injury to the Lisfranc’s joint, in particular to the second metatarsal–medial cuneiform (second MMC) joint, can be difficult to evaluate, especially in subtle Lisfranc injuries. The purpose of this study was to determine the value of the Lisfranc joint width (diastasis) of the adult foot in a standardized population thereby establishing a potential reference range when investigating this area for potential injury. Methods. The 2nd MMC joint in 50 men and 50 women was evaluated. Individuals with a history of foot/ankle pain, previous foot/ankle operation or fracture, or a history of systemic disease were excluded from the study. Bilateral weightbearing digital anterior-posterior and lateral radiographs were taken using a standardized method. Results. The mean 2nd MMC diastasis in 200 feet was 5.6 mm (95% CI 5.39-5.81). In the female population, the mean 2nd MMC diastasis was 5.8 mm (95% CI 5.51-6.09) as compared with 5.6 mm (95% CI 5.31-5.89) in males. The mean distance between the fifth metatarsal base and first cuneiform in the entire study population was 16.3 mm (95% CI 15.57-17.03). Conclusion. This study helps define baseline measurements of the Lisfranc joint for the general population, which can provide a standard measurement against which suspected foot injuries can be compared. Level of Evidence: Level IV.","PeriodicalId":39271,"journal":{"name":"Foot and Ankle Specialist","volume":"65 4","pages":"494 - 501"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1938640019890738","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radiographic Value of the Lisfranc Diastasis in a Standardized Population\",\"authors\":\"James L. Thomas, A. Kopiec, K. Mark, L. Mae Chandler\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1938640019890738\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. Injury to the Lisfranc’s joint, in particular to the second metatarsal–medial cuneiform (second MMC) joint, can be difficult to evaluate, especially in subtle Lisfranc injuries. The purpose of this study was to determine the value of the Lisfranc joint width (diastasis) of the adult foot in a standardized population thereby establishing a potential reference range when investigating this area for potential injury. Methods. The 2nd MMC joint in 50 men and 50 women was evaluated. Individuals with a history of foot/ankle pain, previous foot/ankle operation or fracture, or a history of systemic disease were excluded from the study. Bilateral weightbearing digital anterior-posterior and lateral radiographs were taken using a standardized method. Results. The mean 2nd MMC diastasis in 200 feet was 5.6 mm (95% CI 5.39-5.81). In the female population, the mean 2nd MMC diastasis was 5.8 mm (95% CI 5.51-6.09) as compared with 5.6 mm (95% CI 5.31-5.89) in males. The mean distance between the fifth metatarsal base and first cuneiform in the entire study population was 16.3 mm (95% CI 15.57-17.03). Conclusion. This study helps define baseline measurements of the Lisfranc joint for the general population, which can provide a standard measurement against which suspected foot injuries can be compared. Level of Evidence: Level IV.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39271,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foot and Ankle Specialist\",\"volume\":\"65 4\",\"pages\":\"494 - 501\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1938640019890738\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foot and Ankle Specialist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1938640019890738\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot and Ankle Specialist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1938640019890738","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
摘要
介绍。对Lisfranc关节的损伤,特别是第二跖内侧楔形关节(第二MMC)的损伤,很难评估,特别是在轻微的Lisfranc损伤中。本研究的目的是在标准化人群中确定成人足Lisfranc关节宽度(离断)的值,从而在调查该区域潜在损伤时建立一个潜在的参考范围。方法。对50名男性和50名女性的第二MMC关节进行了评估。有足部/踝关节疼痛史、既往足部/踝关节手术或骨折史或全身性疾病史的个体被排除在研究之外。采用标准化方法拍摄双侧负重数字前后位和侧位片。结果。200英尺的平均第2次MMC转移为5.6 mm (95% CI 5.39-5.81)。在女性人群中,平均第2 MMC转移为5.8 mm (95% CI 5.51-6.09),而男性为5.6 mm (95% CI 5.31-5.89)。在整个研究人群中,第五跖骨基部与第一楔形骨之间的平均距离为16.3 mm (95% CI 15.57-17.03)。结论。这项研究有助于为一般人群确定Lisfranc关节的基线测量值,这可以提供一个标准的测量值,用于比较可疑的足部损伤。证据等级:四级。
Radiographic Value of the Lisfranc Diastasis in a Standardized Population
Introduction. Injury to the Lisfranc’s joint, in particular to the second metatarsal–medial cuneiform (second MMC) joint, can be difficult to evaluate, especially in subtle Lisfranc injuries. The purpose of this study was to determine the value of the Lisfranc joint width (diastasis) of the adult foot in a standardized population thereby establishing a potential reference range when investigating this area for potential injury. Methods. The 2nd MMC joint in 50 men and 50 women was evaluated. Individuals with a history of foot/ankle pain, previous foot/ankle operation or fracture, or a history of systemic disease were excluded from the study. Bilateral weightbearing digital anterior-posterior and lateral radiographs were taken using a standardized method. Results. The mean 2nd MMC diastasis in 200 feet was 5.6 mm (95% CI 5.39-5.81). In the female population, the mean 2nd MMC diastasis was 5.8 mm (95% CI 5.51-6.09) as compared with 5.6 mm (95% CI 5.31-5.89) in males. The mean distance between the fifth metatarsal base and first cuneiform in the entire study population was 16.3 mm (95% CI 15.57-17.03). Conclusion. This study helps define baseline measurements of the Lisfranc joint for the general population, which can provide a standard measurement against which suspected foot injuries can be compared. Level of Evidence: Level IV.