老鼠用的混合面粉。acha (D. iburua & D. exilis)和豆粕(Glycine max)的营养和生物功效报告

S. D. Sudik, O. S. Ijarotimi, J. O. Agbede, F. A. Igbasan
{"title":"老鼠用的混合面粉。acha (D. iburua & D. exilis)和豆粕(Glycine max)的营养和生物功效报告","authors":"S. D. Sudik, O. S. Ijarotimi, J. O. Agbede, F. A. Igbasan","doi":"10.21071/az.v69i267.5344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The nutritional potentials of acha as alternative energy source to maize in complementary foods was evaluated with a view to increase the accessibility and affordability of complementary foods by the resource poor mothers. The formulated acha-based complementary foods (D. iburua (DIF); D. exilis (DEF)), maize-based complementary food (MCF) and commercial formula (CFF) were evaluated for chemical compositions and nutritional qualities. Data were statistically analysed. Crude protein (g/100g) and energy values (kcal.) of DEF and DIF were 15.28 - 15.69 and 409.6 - 405.3 respectively, and were comparable to MCF (15.40; 407.9) and commercial formula (CFF) (15.50; 415.0). Essential amino acids of DEF and DIF were 35.64 and 38.76 g/16N respectively. The Na/K and Ca/P molar ratios of DEF and DIF ranged from 0.59 – 0.60 and 1.67 – 1.71 respectively. Phytate, oxalate and tannin concentrations were within tolerable levels. Biological values and protein efficiency ratios of experimental foods were 87.21 - 87.81% and 2.94 - 3.12 respectively, and were higher than maize-based formula (84.32%; 2.02) and commercial formula (86.53%; 2.52). Growth performance of rats fed on experimental were comparable to those fed on commercial formula, but lower in production costs (USD = 0.24) than CFF (USD = 0.90). The acha-based complementary foods were characterized with essential nutrients, ability to support growth and development, affordable and accessible to poor resource mothers; hence, the food samples may be suitable as complementary foods.","PeriodicalId":40003,"journal":{"name":"Archivos de Zootecnia","volume":"20 21","pages":"262-271"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mezcla de harinas para ratas. Informe nutricional y bioeficacia de acha (D. iburua & D. exilis) y harina de soja (Glycine max)\",\"authors\":\"S. D. Sudik, O. S. Ijarotimi, J. O. Agbede, F. A. Igbasan\",\"doi\":\"10.21071/az.v69i267.5344\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The nutritional potentials of acha as alternative energy source to maize in complementary foods was evaluated with a view to increase the accessibility and affordability of complementary foods by the resource poor mothers. The formulated acha-based complementary foods (D. iburua (DIF); D. exilis (DEF)), maize-based complementary food (MCF) and commercial formula (CFF) were evaluated for chemical compositions and nutritional qualities. Data were statistically analysed. Crude protein (g/100g) and energy values (kcal.) of DEF and DIF were 15.28 - 15.69 and 409.6 - 405.3 respectively, and were comparable to MCF (15.40; 407.9) and commercial formula (CFF) (15.50; 415.0). Essential amino acids of DEF and DIF were 35.64 and 38.76 g/16N respectively. The Na/K and Ca/P molar ratios of DEF and DIF ranged from 0.59 – 0.60 and 1.67 – 1.71 respectively. Phytate, oxalate and tannin concentrations were within tolerable levels. Biological values and protein efficiency ratios of experimental foods were 87.21 - 87.81% and 2.94 - 3.12 respectively, and were higher than maize-based formula (84.32%; 2.02) and commercial formula (86.53%; 2.52). Growth performance of rats fed on experimental were comparable to those fed on commercial formula, but lower in production costs (USD = 0.24) than CFF (USD = 0.90). The acha-based complementary foods were characterized with essential nutrients, ability to support growth and development, affordable and accessible to poor resource mothers; hence, the food samples may be suitable as complementary foods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40003,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archivos de Zootecnia\",\"volume\":\"20 21\",\"pages\":\"262-271\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archivos de Zootecnia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21071/az.v69i267.5344\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos de Zootecnia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21071/az.v69i267.5344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了提高资源贫乏的母亲对辅食的可及性和可负担性,评价了番槐作为玉米辅食替代能源的营养潜力。配方的以亚茶为基础的辅食(D. iburua (DIF);对玉米辅食(MCF)和商业配方(CFF)的化学成分和营养品质进行了评价。对资料进行统计学分析。DEF和DIF的粗蛋白质(g/100g)和能量值(kcal.)分别为15.28 ~ 15.69和409.6 ~ 405.3,与MCF (15.40;407.9)和商业配方(CFF) (15.50;415.0)。DEF和DIF的必需氨基酸含量分别为35.64和38.76 g/16N。DEF和DIF的Na/K摩尔比为0.59 ~ 0.60,Ca/P摩尔比为1.67 ~ 1.71。植酸盐、草酸盐和单宁酸浓度均在可耐受水平内。试验食品的生物学价值和蛋白质效率分别为87.21 ~ 87.81%和2.94 ~ 3.12,均高于玉米配方(84.32%;2.02)和商用配方(86.53%);2.52)。实验饲料大鼠的生长性能与市售饲料相当,但生产成本(USD = 0.24)低于CFF饲料(USD = 0.90)。以阿恰为基础的辅食具有必需营养素、支持生长发育的能力、资源贫乏的母亲能够负担得起和获得的特点;因此,食品样品可能适合作为辅助食品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mezcla de harinas para ratas. Informe nutricional y bioeficacia de acha (D. iburua & D. exilis) y harina de soja (Glycine max)
The nutritional potentials of acha as alternative energy source to maize in complementary foods was evaluated with a view to increase the accessibility and affordability of complementary foods by the resource poor mothers. The formulated acha-based complementary foods (D. iburua (DIF); D. exilis (DEF)), maize-based complementary food (MCF) and commercial formula (CFF) were evaluated for chemical compositions and nutritional qualities. Data were statistically analysed. Crude protein (g/100g) and energy values (kcal.) of DEF and DIF were 15.28 - 15.69 and 409.6 - 405.3 respectively, and were comparable to MCF (15.40; 407.9) and commercial formula (CFF) (15.50; 415.0). Essential amino acids of DEF and DIF were 35.64 and 38.76 g/16N respectively. The Na/K and Ca/P molar ratios of DEF and DIF ranged from 0.59 – 0.60 and 1.67 – 1.71 respectively. Phytate, oxalate and tannin concentrations were within tolerable levels. Biological values and protein efficiency ratios of experimental foods were 87.21 - 87.81% and 2.94 - 3.12 respectively, and were higher than maize-based formula (84.32%; 2.02) and commercial formula (86.53%; 2.52). Growth performance of rats fed on experimental were comparable to those fed on commercial formula, but lower in production costs (USD = 0.24) than CFF (USD = 0.90). The acha-based complementary foods were characterized with essential nutrients, ability to support growth and development, affordable and accessible to poor resource mothers; hence, the food samples may be suitable as complementary foods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archivos de Zootecnia
Archivos de Zootecnia Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Archivos de Zootecnia is a quarterly, multilingual, international science journal, published by the University of Cordoba and the Asociación Iberoamericana de Zootecnia. The journal was founded in 1952 as the voice for the Zootechnics Institute of the Veterinary Faculty at the University of Cordoba. Its aim is to disseminate results from research into animal production and related areas, giving special attention to farming systems in developing areas, their local breeds and alternative production methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信