来自编辑器

IF 1.3 Q3 ECONOMICS
G. Clarke
{"title":"来自编辑器","authors":"G. Clarke","doi":"10.1080/08853908.2023.2172765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dear Readers, Welcome to the second issue of The International Trade Journal (ITJ)’s thirty-seventh volume. The articles in this issue focus on regional integration and regional trade agreements. The first three articles look at different aspects of regional trade agreements, while the final two articles look at broader issues related to regional integration. The first article, by Yash Parakh and Anwesha Aditya, looks at the economic, political, and cultural factors that affect whether countries form regional trade agreements (RTAs) with each other. In addition to economic factors such as market size and distance, they find that political and cultural factors are also important. On the political side, they find liberal democracies and countries that have a military alliance are more likely to enter into an RTA. Countries that have a common language are also more likely to enter an agreement. In contrast, colonial heritage negatively impacts how likely countries are to enter an RTA. The second article, by Zouheir El-Sahli, looks at the effect of the Greater Arab Free Trade Agreement (GAFTA) on trade and economic welfare in the Middle East and North Africa. Using a gravity model, the author estimates that the agreement increased trade between countries in the region by about 40%. Although the relative increase was large relative to pre-GAFTA trade, this was from a low base. As a result, intra-GAFTA trade accounted for less than 10% of the countries’ total trade almost 20 years after GAFTA came into effect. By comparison, intra-EU and intra-NAFTA trade accounted for about 45 and 25% of total trade for countries in these regions. Because of this, the agreement had only a very modest impact on wages or total trade for countries in the GAFTA region. The authors argue that this might be because GAFTA is a relatively shallow trade agreement. The third article, by Francisco Benita, looks at how regional trade agreements performed during and following the 2007 to 2009 financial crisis. The article looks at trade between member countries of five regional groupings: the Southern Common Market (Mercosur), the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), the Arab Maghreb Union, and the Southern African Customs Union (SACU). It also looks at trade between members of these countries and nonmember","PeriodicalId":35638,"journal":{"name":"International Trade Journal","volume":"75 ","pages":"155 - 157"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From the Editor\",\"authors\":\"G. Clarke\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08853908.2023.2172765\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Dear Readers, Welcome to the second issue of The International Trade Journal (ITJ)’s thirty-seventh volume. The articles in this issue focus on regional integration and regional trade agreements. The first three articles look at different aspects of regional trade agreements, while the final two articles look at broader issues related to regional integration. The first article, by Yash Parakh and Anwesha Aditya, looks at the economic, political, and cultural factors that affect whether countries form regional trade agreements (RTAs) with each other. In addition to economic factors such as market size and distance, they find that political and cultural factors are also important. On the political side, they find liberal democracies and countries that have a military alliance are more likely to enter into an RTA. Countries that have a common language are also more likely to enter an agreement. In contrast, colonial heritage negatively impacts how likely countries are to enter an RTA. The second article, by Zouheir El-Sahli, looks at the effect of the Greater Arab Free Trade Agreement (GAFTA) on trade and economic welfare in the Middle East and North Africa. Using a gravity model, the author estimates that the agreement increased trade between countries in the region by about 40%. Although the relative increase was large relative to pre-GAFTA trade, this was from a low base. As a result, intra-GAFTA trade accounted for less than 10% of the countries’ total trade almost 20 years after GAFTA came into effect. By comparison, intra-EU and intra-NAFTA trade accounted for about 45 and 25% of total trade for countries in these regions. Because of this, the agreement had only a very modest impact on wages or total trade for countries in the GAFTA region. The authors argue that this might be because GAFTA is a relatively shallow trade agreement. The third article, by Francisco Benita, looks at how regional trade agreements performed during and following the 2007 to 2009 financial crisis. The article looks at trade between member countries of five regional groupings: the Southern Common Market (Mercosur), the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), the Arab Maghreb Union, and the Southern African Customs Union (SACU). It also looks at trade between members of these countries and nonmember\",\"PeriodicalId\":35638,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Trade Journal\",\"volume\":\"75 \",\"pages\":\"155 - 157\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Trade Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08853908.2023.2172765\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Trade Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08853908.2023.2172765","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尊敬的读者:欢迎阅读《国际贸易杂志》(ITJ)第37卷第2期。本期文章的重点是区域一体化和区域贸易协定。前三篇文章着眼于区域贸易协定的不同方面,而最后两篇文章着眼于与区域一体化有关的更广泛的问题。第一篇文章由Yash Parakh和Anwesha Aditya撰写,着眼于影响国家之间是否形成区域贸易协定(rta)的经济、政治和文化因素。他们发现,除了市场规模和距离等经济因素外,政治和文化因素也很重要。在政治方面,他们发现自由民主国家和有军事联盟的国家更有可能加入区域贸易协定。拥有共同语言的国家也更有可能达成协议。相比之下,殖民遗产会对各国进入区域贸易协定的可能性产生负面影响。第二篇文章由Zouheir El-Sahli撰写,着眼于大阿拉伯自由贸易协定(GAFTA)对中东和北非地区贸易和经济福利的影响。利用重力模型,作者估计该协定使该地区国家之间的贸易增加了约40%。虽然相对于gafta之前的贸易增长很大,但这是一个较低的基数。因此,在GAFTA生效近20年后,GAFTA内贸易占各国贸易总额的比例不到10%。相比之下,欧盟内部贸易和北美自由贸易协定内部贸易分别占这些地区国家贸易总额的45%和25%左右。正因为如此,该协定对GAFTA地区各国的工资或贸易总额的影响非常有限。作者认为,这可能是因为GAFTA是一个相对浅层的贸易协定。第三篇文章由弗朗西斯科·贝尼塔(Francisco Benita)撰写,研究了区域贸易协定在2007年至2009年金融危机期间及之后的表现。本文着眼于五个区域集团成员国之间的贸易:南方共同市场(Mercosur)、北美自由贸易协定(NAFTA)、东南亚国家联盟(ASEAN)、阿拉伯马格里布联盟(Arab Maghreb Union)和南部非洲关税同盟(SACU)。它还研究了这些国家的成员国和非成员国之间的贸易
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From the Editor
Dear Readers, Welcome to the second issue of The International Trade Journal (ITJ)’s thirty-seventh volume. The articles in this issue focus on regional integration and regional trade agreements. The first three articles look at different aspects of regional trade agreements, while the final two articles look at broader issues related to regional integration. The first article, by Yash Parakh and Anwesha Aditya, looks at the economic, political, and cultural factors that affect whether countries form regional trade agreements (RTAs) with each other. In addition to economic factors such as market size and distance, they find that political and cultural factors are also important. On the political side, they find liberal democracies and countries that have a military alliance are more likely to enter into an RTA. Countries that have a common language are also more likely to enter an agreement. In contrast, colonial heritage negatively impacts how likely countries are to enter an RTA. The second article, by Zouheir El-Sahli, looks at the effect of the Greater Arab Free Trade Agreement (GAFTA) on trade and economic welfare in the Middle East and North Africa. Using a gravity model, the author estimates that the agreement increased trade between countries in the region by about 40%. Although the relative increase was large relative to pre-GAFTA trade, this was from a low base. As a result, intra-GAFTA trade accounted for less than 10% of the countries’ total trade almost 20 years after GAFTA came into effect. By comparison, intra-EU and intra-NAFTA trade accounted for about 45 and 25% of total trade for countries in these regions. Because of this, the agreement had only a very modest impact on wages or total trade for countries in the GAFTA region. The authors argue that this might be because GAFTA is a relatively shallow trade agreement. The third article, by Francisco Benita, looks at how regional trade agreements performed during and following the 2007 to 2009 financial crisis. The article looks at trade between member countries of five regional groupings: the Southern Common Market (Mercosur), the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), the Arab Maghreb Union, and the Southern African Customs Union (SACU). It also looks at trade between members of these countries and nonmember
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Trade Journal
International Trade Journal Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: The International Trade Journal is a refereed interdisciplinary journal published for the enhancement of research in international trade. Its editorial objective is to provide a forum for the scholarly exchange of research findings in,and significant empirical, conceptual, or theoretical contributions to the field. The International Trade Journal welcomes contributions from researchers in academia as well as practitioners of international trade broadly defined.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信