“发展”的狡猾表亲?设计教育教学可持续性中的“影响”概念

IF 2.4 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
D. Meth, Claire Brophy, S. Thomson
{"title":"“发展”的狡猾表亲?设计教育教学可持续性中的“影响”概念","authors":"D. Meth, Claire Brophy, S. Thomson","doi":"10.1080/13562517.2023.2198638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In design, aspirations of ‘development’ and ‘innovation’ are now scrutinised to redress persistent market-led practice. Socially and environmentally responsive pedagogies can shift students’ mindsets to consider the impacts of design practices on the planet’s complex systems and societies. At the Queensland University of Technology, Australia, four transdisciplinary experiential ‘Impact Lab’ design units actively address this within a reimagined degree. Qualitative action research explores students’ interpretations of ‘impact,’ and results reveal their interpretations are diverse, despite theoretically strong grounds, reflecting only an emergent understanding of the wider sustainability and design justice agenda. The argument is made that ‘impact’ as a loaded term in our context may inadvertently restrict the development of such understandings. This endorses the need for ongoing critical interpretation and usage of the term, and urges that caution be exercised in how it manifests through pedagogies and curricula.","PeriodicalId":22198,"journal":{"name":"Teaching in Higher Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A slippery cousin to ‘development’? The concept of ‘impact’ in teaching sustainability in design education\",\"authors\":\"D. Meth, Claire Brophy, S. Thomson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13562517.2023.2198638\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In design, aspirations of ‘development’ and ‘innovation’ are now scrutinised to redress persistent market-led practice. Socially and environmentally responsive pedagogies can shift students’ mindsets to consider the impacts of design practices on the planet’s complex systems and societies. At the Queensland University of Technology, Australia, four transdisciplinary experiential ‘Impact Lab’ design units actively address this within a reimagined degree. Qualitative action research explores students’ interpretations of ‘impact,’ and results reveal their interpretations are diverse, despite theoretically strong grounds, reflecting only an emergent understanding of the wider sustainability and design justice agenda. The argument is made that ‘impact’ as a loaded term in our context may inadvertently restrict the development of such understandings. This endorses the need for ongoing critical interpretation and usage of the term, and urges that caution be exercised in how it manifests through pedagogies and curricula.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22198,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teaching in Higher Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teaching in Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2023.2198638\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2023.2198638","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要在设计中,“发展”和“创新”的愿望现在被仔细审查,以纠正市场主导的持续做法。对社会和环境有反应的教学法可以改变学生的心态,考虑设计实践对地球复杂系统和社会的影响。在澳大利亚昆士兰科技大学,四个跨学科体验式“影响实验室”设计单位在重新构想的学位范围内积极解决这一问题。定性行动研究探讨了学生对“影响”的解释,结果表明,尽管理论上有很强的依据,但他们的解释是多样的,只反映了对更广泛的可持续性和设计正义议程的初步理解。有人认为,在我们的语境中,“影响”作为一个负载术语,可能会无意中限制这种理解的发展。这赞同对该术语进行持续批判性解释和使用的必要性,并敦促谨慎对待其在教学法和课程中的表现方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A slippery cousin to ‘development’? The concept of ‘impact’ in teaching sustainability in design education
ABSTRACT In design, aspirations of ‘development’ and ‘innovation’ are now scrutinised to redress persistent market-led practice. Socially and environmentally responsive pedagogies can shift students’ mindsets to consider the impacts of design practices on the planet’s complex systems and societies. At the Queensland University of Technology, Australia, four transdisciplinary experiential ‘Impact Lab’ design units actively address this within a reimagined degree. Qualitative action research explores students’ interpretations of ‘impact,’ and results reveal their interpretations are diverse, despite theoretically strong grounds, reflecting only an emergent understanding of the wider sustainability and design justice agenda. The argument is made that ‘impact’ as a loaded term in our context may inadvertently restrict the development of such understandings. This endorses the need for ongoing critical interpretation and usage of the term, and urges that caution be exercised in how it manifests through pedagogies and curricula.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Teaching in Higher Education
Teaching in Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Teaching in Higher Education has become an internationally recognised field, which is more than ever open to multiple forms of contestation. However, the intellectual challenge which teaching presents has been inadequately acknowledged and theorised in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education addresses this gap by publishing scholarly work that critically examines and interrogates the values and presuppositions underpinning teaching, introduces theoretical perspectives and insights drawn from different disciplinary and methodological frameworks, and considers how teaching and research can be brought into a closer relationship. The journal welcomes contributions that aim to develop sustained reflection, investigation and critique, and that critically identify new agendas for research, for example by: examining the impact on teaching exerted by wider contextual factors such as policy, funding, institutional change and the expectations of society; developing conceptual analyses of pedagogical issues and debates, such as authority, power, assessment and the nature of understanding; exploring the various values which underlie teaching including those concerned with social justice and equity; offering critical accounts of lived experiences of higher education pedagogies which bring together theory and practice. Authors are strongly encouraged to engage with and build on previous contributions and issues raised in the journal. Please note that the journal does not publish: -descriptions and/or evaluations of policy and/or practice; -localised case studies that are not contextualized and theorised; -large-scale surveys that are not theoretically and critically analysed; -studies that simply replicate previous work without establishing originality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信