{"title":"第三共和国巴黎的另一个现代化城市。方坦的《方坦书星》和朱丽·帕纳旦的《现代时代》都是方坦艺术的代表","authors":"H. Körner","doi":"10.31577/ars-2021-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Of the two studies that deal with works of the ‘other modernity’ of the French 19th century, the first deals with objects that, as multiply producible and stylistically eclectic objects, fell through the Modernist grid, although they correspond exactly to a definition of the avant-garde as formulated in the succession of Saint-Simon. The second asks whether the iconography of “modern life”, in the sense of Charles Baudelaire’s “Le peintre de la vie moderne”, should not be added to the definition of modernity against a limited formalist definition of modernity.","PeriodicalId":31329,"journal":{"name":"ARS","volume":"116 s434","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eine andere Moderne im Paris der Dritten Republik. Die „Fontaines Wallace“ und Jules Coutans „Porteuse de pain“ als Avantgarde-Kunst\",\"authors\":\"H. Körner\",\"doi\":\"10.31577/ars-2021-0001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Of the two studies that deal with works of the ‘other modernity’ of the French 19th century, the first deals with objects that, as multiply producible and stylistically eclectic objects, fell through the Modernist grid, although they correspond exactly to a definition of the avant-garde as formulated in the succession of Saint-Simon. The second asks whether the iconography of “modern life”, in the sense of Charles Baudelaire’s “Le peintre de la vie moderne”, should not be added to the definition of modernity against a limited formalist definition of modernity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ARS\",\"volume\":\"116 s434\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ARS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31577/ars-2021-0001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31577/ars-2021-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Eine andere Moderne im Paris der Dritten Republik. Die „Fontaines Wallace“ und Jules Coutans „Porteuse de pain“ als Avantgarde-Kunst
Of the two studies that deal with works of the ‘other modernity’ of the French 19th century, the first deals with objects that, as multiply producible and stylistically eclectic objects, fell through the Modernist grid, although they correspond exactly to a definition of the avant-garde as formulated in the succession of Saint-Simon. The second asks whether the iconography of “modern life”, in the sense of Charles Baudelaire’s “Le peintre de la vie moderne”, should not be added to the definition of modernity against a limited formalist definition of modernity.