乌干达东部男性参与使用现代计划生育方法的促成因素和障碍:一项定性研究。

IF 2.2 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Atkinson Tekakwo, Rose Chalo Nabirye, Ritah Nantale, Faith Oguttu, Brendah Nambozo, Solomon Wani, Milton W Musaba, David Mukunya, Joshua Epuitai
{"title":"乌干达东部男性参与使用现代计划生育方法的促成因素和障碍:一项定性研究。","authors":"Atkinson Tekakwo, Rose Chalo Nabirye, Ritah Nantale, Faith Oguttu, Brendah Nambozo, Solomon Wani, Milton W Musaba, David Mukunya, Joshua Epuitai","doi":"10.1186/s40834-023-00251-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Male involvement plays a critical role in the utilization of various sexual and reproductive health services. We explored enablers and barriers of male involvement in the use of modern family planning methods in Eastern Uganda.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a qualitative study in Mbale, Eastern Uganda done between November and December 2022. We conducted three group discussions comprising of four participants each, with male partners and eight key informant interviews with midwives. We followed a group discussion guide during the group discussions and an interview guide during the key informant interviews to explore enablers and barriers of male involvement in the use of modern family planning methods. All the interviews and group discussions were audio-recorded with permission from the participants, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed following thematic content analysis approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two sub-themes emerged from the analysis; perceived enablers and barriers. The perceived enablers included positive attitude, subjective norms, need to support the woman, mutual consent, limited resources and expected benefits of reducing gender-based violence and sexually transmitted infections. Lack of male partner consent, busy work engagement, social stigma, religious prohibition, desire for many children and gender roles incompatibility hindered male partner involvement in family planning. Fear of side effects and misconceptions, unconducive hospital environment in form of mistreatment, family planning considered a female's issue, and lack of consideration of male partner needs in family planning clinic were additional barriers to male involvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Male involvement in family planning was related to positive attitude and subjective norms towards family planning, mutual consent, and recognition for limited resources to support a large family size. Lack of male partner approval, fear of side effects and misconceptions, unconducive hospital environment and social, cultural and religious prohibitions discouraged male partner involvement in family planning. Community based approaches to family planning sensitization, such as community education campaigns, may be an important step toward reducing barriers to male involvement in the use of modern family planning methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":93956,"journal":{"name":"Contraception and reproductive medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10577923/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enablers and barriers of male involvement in the use of modern family planning methods in Eastern Uganda: a qualitative study.\",\"authors\":\"Atkinson Tekakwo, Rose Chalo Nabirye, Ritah Nantale, Faith Oguttu, Brendah Nambozo, Solomon Wani, Milton W Musaba, David Mukunya, Joshua Epuitai\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40834-023-00251-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Male involvement plays a critical role in the utilization of various sexual and reproductive health services. We explored enablers and barriers of male involvement in the use of modern family planning methods in Eastern Uganda.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a qualitative study in Mbale, Eastern Uganda done between November and December 2022. We conducted three group discussions comprising of four participants each, with male partners and eight key informant interviews with midwives. We followed a group discussion guide during the group discussions and an interview guide during the key informant interviews to explore enablers and barriers of male involvement in the use of modern family planning methods. All the interviews and group discussions were audio-recorded with permission from the participants, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed following thematic content analysis approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two sub-themes emerged from the analysis; perceived enablers and barriers. The perceived enablers included positive attitude, subjective norms, need to support the woman, mutual consent, limited resources and expected benefits of reducing gender-based violence and sexually transmitted infections. Lack of male partner consent, busy work engagement, social stigma, religious prohibition, desire for many children and gender roles incompatibility hindered male partner involvement in family planning. Fear of side effects and misconceptions, unconducive hospital environment in form of mistreatment, family planning considered a female's issue, and lack of consideration of male partner needs in family planning clinic were additional barriers to male involvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Male involvement in family planning was related to positive attitude and subjective norms towards family planning, mutual consent, and recognition for limited resources to support a large family size. Lack of male partner approval, fear of side effects and misconceptions, unconducive hospital environment and social, cultural and religious prohibitions discouraged male partner involvement in family planning. Community based approaches to family planning sensitization, such as community education campaigns, may be an important step toward reducing barriers to male involvement in the use of modern family planning methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contraception and reproductive medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10577923/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contraception and reproductive medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40834-023-00251-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception and reproductive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40834-023-00251-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:男性参与在利用各种性健康和生殖健康服务方面发挥着关键作用。我们探讨了乌干达东部男性参与使用现代计划生育方法的因素和障碍。方法:这是2022年11月至12月在乌干达东部姆巴莱进行的一项定性研究。我们进行了三次小组讨论,每个小组由四名参与者组成,其中包括男性伴侣,以及对助产士的八次关键线人访谈。我们在小组讨论中遵循了小组讨论指南,在关键线人访谈中遵循了访谈指南,以探索男性参与使用现代计划生育方法的促成因素和障碍。所有访谈和小组讨论都是在参与者允许的情况下录制的音频,逐字逐句转录,并按照主题内容分析方法进行分析。结果:分析得出两个子主题;感知的促成因素和障碍。被认为的促成因素包括积极的态度、主观规范、支持妇女的必要性、相互同意、有限的资源以及减少基于性别的暴力和性传播感染的预期好处。缺乏男性伴侣的同意、忙于工作、社会污名化、宗教禁令、对多个孩子的渴望以及性别角色的不相容阻碍了男性伴侣参与计划生育。对副作用和误解的恐惧、虐待形式的不利于医院环境、计划生育被视为女性的问题,以及在计划生育诊所缺乏对男性伴侣需求的考虑,都是男性参与的额外障碍。结论:男性参与计划生育与积极的计划生育态度和主观规范、相互同意以及对有限资源支持大家庭的认可有关。缺乏对男性伴侣的认可,担心副作用和误解,医院环境不利,社会、文化和宗教禁令阻碍了男性伴侣参与计划生育。以社区为基础的计划生育宣传方法,如社区教育运动,可能是减少男性参与使用现代计划生育方法的障碍的重要一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enablers and barriers of male involvement in the use of modern family planning methods in Eastern Uganda: a qualitative study.

Background: Male involvement plays a critical role in the utilization of various sexual and reproductive health services. We explored enablers and barriers of male involvement in the use of modern family planning methods in Eastern Uganda.

Methods: This was a qualitative study in Mbale, Eastern Uganda done between November and December 2022. We conducted three group discussions comprising of four participants each, with male partners and eight key informant interviews with midwives. We followed a group discussion guide during the group discussions and an interview guide during the key informant interviews to explore enablers and barriers of male involvement in the use of modern family planning methods. All the interviews and group discussions were audio-recorded with permission from the participants, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed following thematic content analysis approach.

Results: Two sub-themes emerged from the analysis; perceived enablers and barriers. The perceived enablers included positive attitude, subjective norms, need to support the woman, mutual consent, limited resources and expected benefits of reducing gender-based violence and sexually transmitted infections. Lack of male partner consent, busy work engagement, social stigma, religious prohibition, desire for many children and gender roles incompatibility hindered male partner involvement in family planning. Fear of side effects and misconceptions, unconducive hospital environment in form of mistreatment, family planning considered a female's issue, and lack of consideration of male partner needs in family planning clinic were additional barriers to male involvement.

Conclusion: Male involvement in family planning was related to positive attitude and subjective norms towards family planning, mutual consent, and recognition for limited resources to support a large family size. Lack of male partner approval, fear of side effects and misconceptions, unconducive hospital environment and social, cultural and religious prohibitions discouraged male partner involvement in family planning. Community based approaches to family planning sensitization, such as community education campaigns, may be an important step toward reducing barriers to male involvement in the use of modern family planning methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信