Bruce方案的60年:重新评估运动压力测试与心电图监测的当代作用。

Porto biomedical journal Pub Date : 2023-10-16 eCollection Date: 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000235
Eduardo M Vilela, Cátia Oliveira, Cláudia Oliveira, Susana Torres, Francisco Sampaio, João Primo, José Ribeiro, Madalena Teixeira, Marco Oliveira, Nuno Bettencourt, Sofia Viamonte, Ricardo Fontes-Carvalho
{"title":"Bruce方案的60年:重新评估运动压力测试与心电图监测的当代作用。","authors":"Eduardo M Vilela, Cátia Oliveira, Cláudia Oliveira, Susana Torres, Francisco Sampaio, João Primo, José Ribeiro, Madalena Teixeira, Marco Oliveira, Nuno Bettencourt, Sofia Viamonte, Ricardo Fontes-Carvalho","doi":"10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The cardiovascular response to exercise has long been a focus of interest. Over a century ago, the first descriptions of electrocardiographic changes occurring during exercise highlighted the possible relevance of this dynamic assessment. In this background, the inception of the Bruce protocol circa 60 years ago allowed for a major leap in this field by providing a standardized framework with which to address this issue, by means of an integrated and structured methodology. Since then, exercise stress testing with electrocardiographic monitoring (ExECG) has become one of the most widely appraised tests in cardiovascular medicine. Notably, past few decades have been profoundly marked by substantial advances in the approach to cardiovascular disease, challenging prior notions concerning both its physiopathology and overall management. Among these, the ever-evolving presentations of cardiovascular disease coupled with the development and implementation of several novel diagnostic modalities (both invasive and noninvasive) has led to a shifting paradigm in the application of ExECG. This technique, however, has continuously shown to be of added value across various momentums of the cardiovascular continuum, as depicted in several contemporary guidelines. This review provides a pragmatical reflexion on the development of ExECG, presenting a comprehensive overview concerning the current role of this modality, its challenges, and its future perspectives.</p>","PeriodicalId":74479,"journal":{"name":"Porto biomedical journal","volume":"8 5","pages":"e235"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/44/84/pj9-8-e235.PMC10575366.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sixty years of the Bruce protocol: reappraising the contemporary role of exercise stress testing with electrocardiographic monitoring.\",\"authors\":\"Eduardo M Vilela, Cátia Oliveira, Cláudia Oliveira, Susana Torres, Francisco Sampaio, João Primo, José Ribeiro, Madalena Teixeira, Marco Oliveira, Nuno Bettencourt, Sofia Viamonte, Ricardo Fontes-Carvalho\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000235\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The cardiovascular response to exercise has long been a focus of interest. Over a century ago, the first descriptions of electrocardiographic changes occurring during exercise highlighted the possible relevance of this dynamic assessment. In this background, the inception of the Bruce protocol circa 60 years ago allowed for a major leap in this field by providing a standardized framework with which to address this issue, by means of an integrated and structured methodology. Since then, exercise stress testing with electrocardiographic monitoring (ExECG) has become one of the most widely appraised tests in cardiovascular medicine. Notably, past few decades have been profoundly marked by substantial advances in the approach to cardiovascular disease, challenging prior notions concerning both its physiopathology and overall management. Among these, the ever-evolving presentations of cardiovascular disease coupled with the development and implementation of several novel diagnostic modalities (both invasive and noninvasive) has led to a shifting paradigm in the application of ExECG. This technique, however, has continuously shown to be of added value across various momentums of the cardiovascular continuum, as depicted in several contemporary guidelines. This review provides a pragmatical reflexion on the development of ExECG, presenting a comprehensive overview concerning the current role of this modality, its challenges, and its future perspectives.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Porto biomedical journal\",\"volume\":\"8 5\",\"pages\":\"e235\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/44/84/pj9-8-e235.PMC10575366.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Porto biomedical journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000235\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Porto biomedical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心血管对运动的反应一直是人们关注的焦点。一个多世纪前,对运动过程中心电图变化的首次描述突出了这种动态评估的可能相关性。在这种背景下,大约60年前Bruce协议的成立,通过提供一个标准化的框架,通过一种综合和结构化的方法来解决这一问题,从而在这一领域实现了重大飞跃。从那时起,心电图监测运动压力测试(ExECG)已成为心血管医学中评价最广泛的测试之一。值得注意的是,在过去的几十年里,心血管疾病的治疗方法取得了重大进展,挑战了以前关于其生理病理学和整体管理的观念。其中,心血管疾病的不断发展,加上几种新型诊断模式(包括侵入性和非侵入性)的开发和实施,导致了ExECG应用模式的转变。然而,正如几篇当代指南所描述的那样,这项技术在心血管连续体的各个时刻都不断显示出附加值。这篇综述对ExECG的发展进行了务实的反思,对这种模式的当前作用、挑战及其未来前景进行了全面的概述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Sixty years of the Bruce protocol: reappraising the contemporary role of exercise stress testing with electrocardiographic monitoring.

Sixty years of the Bruce protocol: reappraising the contemporary role of exercise stress testing with electrocardiographic monitoring.

The cardiovascular response to exercise has long been a focus of interest. Over a century ago, the first descriptions of electrocardiographic changes occurring during exercise highlighted the possible relevance of this dynamic assessment. In this background, the inception of the Bruce protocol circa 60 years ago allowed for a major leap in this field by providing a standardized framework with which to address this issue, by means of an integrated and structured methodology. Since then, exercise stress testing with electrocardiographic monitoring (ExECG) has become one of the most widely appraised tests in cardiovascular medicine. Notably, past few decades have been profoundly marked by substantial advances in the approach to cardiovascular disease, challenging prior notions concerning both its physiopathology and overall management. Among these, the ever-evolving presentations of cardiovascular disease coupled with the development and implementation of several novel diagnostic modalities (both invasive and noninvasive) has led to a shifting paradigm in the application of ExECG. This technique, however, has continuously shown to be of added value across various momentums of the cardiovascular continuum, as depicted in several contemporary guidelines. This review provides a pragmatical reflexion on the development of ExECG, presenting a comprehensive overview concerning the current role of this modality, its challenges, and its future perspectives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信