猪地方性呼吸道疾病的经济影响和相关干预措施——系统综述。

IF 3 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Marloes Boeters, Beatriz Garcia-Morante, Gerdien van Schaik, Joaquim Segalés, Jonathan Rushton, Wilma Steeneveld
{"title":"猪地方性呼吸道疾病的经济影响和相关干预措施——系统综述。","authors":"Marloes Boeters, Beatriz Garcia-Morante, Gerdien van Schaik, Joaquim Segalés, Jonathan Rushton, Wilma Steeneveld","doi":"10.1186/s40813-023-00342-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding the financial consequences of endemically prevalent pathogens within the porcine respiratory disease complex (PRDC) and the effects of interventions assists decision-making regarding disease prevention and control. The aim of this systematic review was to identify what economic studies have been carried out on infectious endemic respiratory disease in pigs, what methods are being used, and, when feasible, to identify the economic impacts of PRDC pathogens and the costs and benefits of interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>By following the PRISMA method, a total of 58 studies were deemed eligible for the purpose of this systematic review. Twenty-six studies used data derived from European countries, 18 from the US, 6 from Asia, 4 from Oceania, and 4 from other countries, i.e., Canada, Mexico, and Brazil. Main findings from selected publications were: (1) The studies mainly considered endemic scenarios on commercial fattening farms; (2) The porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus was by far the most studied pathogen, followed by Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae, but the absence or presence of other endemic respiratory pathogens was often not verified or accounted for; (3) Most studies calculated the economic impact using primary production data, whereas twelve studies modelled the impact using secondary data only; (4) Seven different economic methods were applied across studies; (5) A large variation exists in the cost and revenue components considered in calculations, with feed costs and reduced carcass value included the most often; (6) The reported median economic impact of one or several co-existing respiratory pathogen(s) ranged from €1.70 to €8.90 per nursery pig, €2.30 to €15.35 per fattening pig, and €100 to €323 per sow per year; and (7) Vaccination was the most studied intervention, and the outcomes of all but three intervention-focused studies were neutral or positive.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The outcomes and discussion from this systematic review provide insight into the studies, their methods, the advantages and limitations of the existing research, and the reported impacts from the endemic respiratory disease complex for pig production systems worldwide. Future research should improve the consistency and comparability of economic assessments by ensuring the inclusion of high impact cost and revenue components and expressing results similarly.</p>","PeriodicalId":20352,"journal":{"name":"Porcine Health Management","volume":"9 1","pages":"45"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10583309/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The economic impact of endemic respiratory disease in pigs and related interventions - a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Marloes Boeters, Beatriz Garcia-Morante, Gerdien van Schaik, Joaquim Segalés, Jonathan Rushton, Wilma Steeneveld\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40813-023-00342-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding the financial consequences of endemically prevalent pathogens within the porcine respiratory disease complex (PRDC) and the effects of interventions assists decision-making regarding disease prevention and control. The aim of this systematic review was to identify what economic studies have been carried out on infectious endemic respiratory disease in pigs, what methods are being used, and, when feasible, to identify the economic impacts of PRDC pathogens and the costs and benefits of interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>By following the PRISMA method, a total of 58 studies were deemed eligible for the purpose of this systematic review. Twenty-six studies used data derived from European countries, 18 from the US, 6 from Asia, 4 from Oceania, and 4 from other countries, i.e., Canada, Mexico, and Brazil. Main findings from selected publications were: (1) The studies mainly considered endemic scenarios on commercial fattening farms; (2) The porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus was by far the most studied pathogen, followed by Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae, but the absence or presence of other endemic respiratory pathogens was often not verified or accounted for; (3) Most studies calculated the economic impact using primary production data, whereas twelve studies modelled the impact using secondary data only; (4) Seven different economic methods were applied across studies; (5) A large variation exists in the cost and revenue components considered in calculations, with feed costs and reduced carcass value included the most often; (6) The reported median economic impact of one or several co-existing respiratory pathogen(s) ranged from €1.70 to €8.90 per nursery pig, €2.30 to €15.35 per fattening pig, and €100 to €323 per sow per year; and (7) Vaccination was the most studied intervention, and the outcomes of all but three intervention-focused studies were neutral or positive.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The outcomes and discussion from this systematic review provide insight into the studies, their methods, the advantages and limitations of the existing research, and the reported impacts from the endemic respiratory disease complex for pig production systems worldwide. Future research should improve the consistency and comparability of economic assessments by ensuring the inclusion of high impact cost and revenue components and expressing results similarly.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20352,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Porcine Health Management\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"45\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10583309/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Porcine Health Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-023-00342-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Porcine Health Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-023-00342-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:了解猪呼吸系统疾病综合征(PRDC)中流行病原体的经济后果以及干预措施的影响,有助于疾病预防和控制的决策。这项系统综述的目的是确定对猪传染性地方性呼吸道疾病进行了哪些经济研究,正在使用哪些方法,并在可行的情况下确定PRDC病原体的经济影响以及干预措施的成本和效益。结果:通过遵循PRISMA方法,共有58项研究被认为符合本系统综述的目的。26项研究使用了来自欧洲国家、18项来自美国、6项来自亚洲、4项来自大洋洲和4项来自其他国家(即加拿大、墨西哥和巴西)的数据。选定出版物的主要发现是:(1)研究主要考虑了商业育肥场的流行情况;(2) 猪繁殖和呼吸综合征病毒是迄今为止研究最多的病原体,其次是猪肺炎支原体,但其他地方性呼吸道病原体的存在往往没有得到证实或解释;(3) 大多数研究使用初级生产数据计算经济影响,而十二项研究仅使用次级数据模拟影响;(4) 研究中采用了七种不同的经济方法;(5) 计算中考虑的成本和收入成分存在很大差异,其中饲料成本和胴体价值降低的情况最为常见;(6) 据报道,一种或几种共存的呼吸道病原体的经济影响中值为每头育肥猪1.70欧元至8.90欧元,每头育肥猪2.30欧元至15.35欧元,每只母猪每年100欧元至323欧元;(7)疫苗接种是研究最多的干预措施,除三项以干预为重点的研究外,其他所有研究的结果均为中性或阳性。结论:这篇系统综述的结果和讨论深入了解了这些研究、它们的方法、现有研究的优势和局限性,以及据报道的地方性呼吸道疾病复合体对全球养猪系统的影响。未来的研究应确保纳入影响较大的成本和收入部分,并以类似方式表达结果,从而提高经济评估的一致性和可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The economic impact of endemic respiratory disease in pigs and related interventions - a systematic review.

The economic impact of endemic respiratory disease in pigs and related interventions - a systematic review.

The economic impact of endemic respiratory disease in pigs and related interventions - a systematic review.

The economic impact of endemic respiratory disease in pigs and related interventions - a systematic review.

Background: Understanding the financial consequences of endemically prevalent pathogens within the porcine respiratory disease complex (PRDC) and the effects of interventions assists decision-making regarding disease prevention and control. The aim of this systematic review was to identify what economic studies have been carried out on infectious endemic respiratory disease in pigs, what methods are being used, and, when feasible, to identify the economic impacts of PRDC pathogens and the costs and benefits of interventions.

Results: By following the PRISMA method, a total of 58 studies were deemed eligible for the purpose of this systematic review. Twenty-six studies used data derived from European countries, 18 from the US, 6 from Asia, 4 from Oceania, and 4 from other countries, i.e., Canada, Mexico, and Brazil. Main findings from selected publications were: (1) The studies mainly considered endemic scenarios on commercial fattening farms; (2) The porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus was by far the most studied pathogen, followed by Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae, but the absence or presence of other endemic respiratory pathogens was often not verified or accounted for; (3) Most studies calculated the economic impact using primary production data, whereas twelve studies modelled the impact using secondary data only; (4) Seven different economic methods were applied across studies; (5) A large variation exists in the cost and revenue components considered in calculations, with feed costs and reduced carcass value included the most often; (6) The reported median economic impact of one or several co-existing respiratory pathogen(s) ranged from €1.70 to €8.90 per nursery pig, €2.30 to €15.35 per fattening pig, and €100 to €323 per sow per year; and (7) Vaccination was the most studied intervention, and the outcomes of all but three intervention-focused studies were neutral or positive.

Conclusion: The outcomes and discussion from this systematic review provide insight into the studies, their methods, the advantages and limitations of the existing research, and the reported impacts from the endemic respiratory disease complex for pig production systems worldwide. Future research should improve the consistency and comparability of economic assessments by ensuring the inclusion of high impact cost and revenue components and expressing results similarly.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Porcine Health Management
Porcine Health Management Veterinary-Food Animals
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
49
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Porcine Health Management (PHM) is an open access peer-reviewed journal that aims to publish relevant, novel and revised information regarding all aspects of swine health medicine and production.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信