Mohammad I. Hirzallah, Supratik Bose, Jingtong Hu, Jonathan S. Maltz
{"title":"卷积神经网络在超声视神经鞘直径测量中的应用","authors":"Mohammad I. Hirzallah, Supratik Bose, Jingtong Hu, Jonathan S. Maltz","doi":"10.1111/jon.13163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Ultrasonographic optic nerve sheath (ONS) diameter is a noninvasive intracranial pressure (ICP) surrogate. ICP is monitored invasively in specialized intensive care units. Noninvasive ICP monitoring is important in less specialized settings. However, noninvasive ICP monitoring using ONS diameter (ONSD) is limited by the need for experts to obtain and perform measurements. We aim to automate ONSD measurements using a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) with a novel masking technique.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We trained a CNN to reproduce masks that mark the ONS. The edges of the mask are defined by an expert. Eight models were trained with 1000 epochs per model. The Dice-similarity-coefficient-weighted averaged outputs of the eight models yielded the final predicted mask. Eight hundred and seventy-three images were obtained from 52 transorbital cine-ultrasonography sessions, performed on 46 patients with brain injuries. Eight hundred and fourteen images from 48 scanning sessions were used for training and validation and 59 images from four sessions for testing. Bland-Altman and Pearson linear correlation analyses were used to evaluate the agreement between CNN and expert measurements.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Expert ONSD measurements and CNN-derived ONSD estimates had strong agreement (<i>r</i> = 0.7, <i>p</i> < .0001). The expert mean ONSD (standard deviation) is 5.27 mm (0.43) compared to CNN mean estimate of 5.46 mm (0.37). Mean difference (95% confidence interval, <i>p</i> value) is 0.19 mm (0.10-0.27 mm, <i>p</i> = .0011), and root mean square error is 0.27 mm.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>A CNN can learn ONSD measurement using masking without image segmentation or landmark detection.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroimaging","volume":"33 6","pages":"898-903"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automation of ultrasonographic optic nerve sheath diameter measurement using convolutional neural networks\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad I. Hirzallah, Supratik Bose, Jingtong Hu, Jonathan S. Maltz\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jon.13163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background and purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>Ultrasonographic optic nerve sheath (ONS) diameter is a noninvasive intracranial pressure (ICP) surrogate. ICP is monitored invasively in specialized intensive care units. Noninvasive ICP monitoring is important in less specialized settings. However, noninvasive ICP monitoring using ONS diameter (ONSD) is limited by the need for experts to obtain and perform measurements. We aim to automate ONSD measurements using a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) with a novel masking technique.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We trained a CNN to reproduce masks that mark the ONS. The edges of the mask are defined by an expert. Eight models were trained with 1000 epochs per model. The Dice-similarity-coefficient-weighted averaged outputs of the eight models yielded the final predicted mask. Eight hundred and seventy-three images were obtained from 52 transorbital cine-ultrasonography sessions, performed on 46 patients with brain injuries. Eight hundred and fourteen images from 48 scanning sessions were used for training and validation and 59 images from four sessions for testing. Bland-Altman and Pearson linear correlation analyses were used to evaluate the agreement between CNN and expert measurements.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Expert ONSD measurements and CNN-derived ONSD estimates had strong agreement (<i>r</i> = 0.7, <i>p</i> < .0001). The expert mean ONSD (standard deviation) is 5.27 mm (0.43) compared to CNN mean estimate of 5.46 mm (0.37). Mean difference (95% confidence interval, <i>p</i> value) is 0.19 mm (0.10-0.27 mm, <i>p</i> = .0011), and root mean square error is 0.27 mm.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>A CNN can learn ONSD measurement using masking without image segmentation or landmark detection.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuroimaging\",\"volume\":\"33 6\",\"pages\":\"898-903\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuroimaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jon.13163\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jon.13163","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景与目的超声检查视神经鞘(ONS)直径是一种无创的颅内压(ICP)替代物。ICP在专门的重症监护病房进行侵入性监测。非侵入性ICP监测在不太专业的情况下很重要。然而,使用ONS直径(ONSD)进行无创ICP监测受到专家获取和执行测量的限制。我们的目标是使用深度卷积神经网络(CNN)和一种新的掩蔽技术来自动化ONSD测量。方法我们训练CNN来复制标记ONS的掩模。遮罩的边缘由专家定义。训练了8个模型,每个模型1000次。8个模型的骰子相似系数加权平均输出得到最终的预测掩模。本文对46例脑损伤患者进行52次经眶超声检查,共获得873张图像。来自48个扫描阶段的814张图像用于训练和验证,来自4个扫描阶段的59张图像用于测试。使用Bland-Altman和Pearson线性相关分析来评估CNN与专家测量之间的一致性。结果专家ONSD测量值与cnn导出的ONSD估计值具有很强的一致性(r = 0.7, p <。)。专家平均ONSD(标准偏差)为5.27 mm(0.43),而CNN的平均估计为5.46 mm(0.37)。平均差值(95%置信区间,p值)为0.19 mm (0.10-0.27 mm, p = 0.0011),均方根误差为0.27 mm。结论CNN不需要图像分割和地标检测就可以使用掩模学习ONSD测量。
Automation of ultrasonographic optic nerve sheath diameter measurement using convolutional neural networks
Background and purpose
Ultrasonographic optic nerve sheath (ONS) diameter is a noninvasive intracranial pressure (ICP) surrogate. ICP is monitored invasively in specialized intensive care units. Noninvasive ICP monitoring is important in less specialized settings. However, noninvasive ICP monitoring using ONS diameter (ONSD) is limited by the need for experts to obtain and perform measurements. We aim to automate ONSD measurements using a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) with a novel masking technique.
Methods
We trained a CNN to reproduce masks that mark the ONS. The edges of the mask are defined by an expert. Eight models were trained with 1000 epochs per model. The Dice-similarity-coefficient-weighted averaged outputs of the eight models yielded the final predicted mask. Eight hundred and seventy-three images were obtained from 52 transorbital cine-ultrasonography sessions, performed on 46 patients with brain injuries. Eight hundred and fourteen images from 48 scanning sessions were used for training and validation and 59 images from four sessions for testing. Bland-Altman and Pearson linear correlation analyses were used to evaluate the agreement between CNN and expert measurements.
Results
Expert ONSD measurements and CNN-derived ONSD estimates had strong agreement (r = 0.7, p < .0001). The expert mean ONSD (standard deviation) is 5.27 mm (0.43) compared to CNN mean estimate of 5.46 mm (0.37). Mean difference (95% confidence interval, p value) is 0.19 mm (0.10-0.27 mm, p = .0011), and root mean square error is 0.27 mm.
Conclusion
A CNN can learn ONSD measurement using masking without image segmentation or landmark detection.
期刊介绍:
Start reading the Journal of Neuroimaging to learn the latest neurological imaging techniques. The peer-reviewed research is written in a practical clinical context, giving you the information you need on:
MRI
CT
Carotid Ultrasound and TCD
SPECT
PET
Endovascular Surgical Neuroradiology
Functional MRI
Xenon CT
and other new and upcoming neuroscientific modalities.The Journal of Neuroimaging addresses the full spectrum of human nervous system disease, including stroke, neoplasia, degenerating and demyelinating disease, epilepsy, tumors, lesions, infectious disease, cerebral vascular arterial diseases, toxic-metabolic disease, psychoses, dementias, heredo-familial disease, and trauma.Offering original research, review articles, case reports, neuroimaging CPCs, and evaluations of instruments and technology relevant to the nervous system, the Journal of Neuroimaging focuses on useful clinical developments and applications, tested techniques and interpretations, patient care, diagnostics, and therapeutics. Start reading today!