癌症新辅助治疗后无事件生存率与总生存率的相关性:系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy Pub Date : 2023-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-08 DOI:10.1080/14737140.2023.2272645
Gyula Ostoros, Robert Hettle, Nefeli Georgoulia, Mehmet Berktas, Pratibha Chander, Ignacio Diaz Perez, Anne-Marie Couto, Christian Eichinger, Polly Field, Peter Morten
{"title":"癌症新辅助治疗后无事件生存率与总生存率的相关性:系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Gyula Ostoros, Robert Hettle, Nefeli Georgoulia, Mehmet Berktas, Pratibha Chander, Ignacio Diaz Perez, Anne-Marie Couto, Christian Eichinger, Polly Field, Peter Morten","doi":"10.1080/14737140.2023.2272645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We wanted to evaluate if event-free survival (EFS) is a reliable surrogate for overall survival (OS) in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (r-NSCLC) receiving neoadjuvant therapy. We conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to investigate the statistical association between EFS and OS.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Electronic databases were searched on 30 July 2021 to identify sources reporting both EFS and OS data in patients with stage I-IIIB r-NSCLC receiving neoadjuvant therapy. Correlation and regression analyses evaluated the association between the effect of treatment on EFS and OS using log-hazard ratios (HRs). Sources in which the entire population had epidermal growth factor receptor mutations were excluded from the analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 74 sources, of which 8 reported EFS and OS HRs from randomized controlled trials. Based on these, we found a positive linear correlation and a strong association between EFS and OS log-HRs (weighted Pearson's correlation coefficient <i>r</i> = 0.864; 95% confidence interval 0.809-0.992; <i>P</i> = 0.006; random-effects meta-regression, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.777).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found a strong association between treatment effects for EFS and OS, indicating that improvements in EFS are likely to be predictive of improvements in OS. EFS may therefore be a reliable surrogate for OS after neoadjuvant therapy in r-NSCLC.</p>","PeriodicalId":12099,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1305-1313"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between event-free survival and overall survival after neoadjuvant treatment for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Gyula Ostoros, Robert Hettle, Nefeli Georgoulia, Mehmet Berktas, Pratibha Chander, Ignacio Diaz Perez, Anne-Marie Couto, Christian Eichinger, Polly Field, Peter Morten\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14737140.2023.2272645\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We wanted to evaluate if event-free survival (EFS) is a reliable surrogate for overall survival (OS) in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (r-NSCLC) receiving neoadjuvant therapy. We conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to investigate the statistical association between EFS and OS.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Electronic databases were searched on 30 July 2021 to identify sources reporting both EFS and OS data in patients with stage I-IIIB r-NSCLC receiving neoadjuvant therapy. Correlation and regression analyses evaluated the association between the effect of treatment on EFS and OS using log-hazard ratios (HRs). Sources in which the entire population had epidermal growth factor receptor mutations were excluded from the analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 74 sources, of which 8 reported EFS and OS HRs from randomized controlled trials. Based on these, we found a positive linear correlation and a strong association between EFS and OS log-HRs (weighted Pearson's correlation coefficient <i>r</i> = 0.864; 95% confidence interval 0.809-0.992; <i>P</i> = 0.006; random-effects meta-regression, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.777).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found a strong association between treatment effects for EFS and OS, indicating that improvements in EFS are likely to be predictive of improvements in OS. EFS may therefore be a reliable surrogate for OS after neoadjuvant therapy in r-NSCLC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1305-1313\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2023.2272645\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2023.2272645","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:我们想评估接受新辅助治疗的可切除癌症(r-NSCLC)患者的无事件生存率(EFS)是否是总生存率(OS)的可靠替代品,我们进行了系统的文献回顾和荟萃分析,以调查EFS和OS之间的统计相关性。研究设计和方法:于2021年7月30日搜索电子数据库,以确定报告接受新辅助治疗的I-IIIB期r-NSCLC患者EFS和OS数据的来源。相关和回归分析使用对数危险比(HR)评估了EFS和OS治疗效果之间的相关性。所有人群都有表皮生长因子受体突变的来源被排除在分析之外。结果:我们确定了74个来源,其中8个报告了随机对照试验中的EFS和OS HR。在此基础上,我们发现EFS和OS log HR之间存在正线性相关性和强相关性(加权Pearson相关系数r = 0.864;95%置信区间0.809-0.992;P = 0.006;随机效应元回归,R2 = 0.777)。结论:我们发现EFS的治疗效果与OS之间有很强的相关性,表明EFS的改善可能预示着OS的改善。因此,EFS可能是r-NSCLC新辅助治疗后OS的可靠替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association between event-free survival and overall survival after neoadjuvant treatment for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: We wanted to evaluate if event-free survival (EFS) is a reliable surrogate for overall survival (OS) in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (r-NSCLC) receiving neoadjuvant therapy. We conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to investigate the statistical association between EFS and OS.

Research design and methods: Electronic databases were searched on 30 July 2021 to identify sources reporting both EFS and OS data in patients with stage I-IIIB r-NSCLC receiving neoadjuvant therapy. Correlation and regression analyses evaluated the association between the effect of treatment on EFS and OS using log-hazard ratios (HRs). Sources in which the entire population had epidermal growth factor receptor mutations were excluded from the analyses.

Results: We identified 74 sources, of which 8 reported EFS and OS HRs from randomized controlled trials. Based on these, we found a positive linear correlation and a strong association between EFS and OS log-HRs (weighted Pearson's correlation coefficient r = 0.864; 95% confidence interval 0.809-0.992; P = 0.006; random-effects meta-regression, R2 = 0.777).

Conclusions: We found a strong association between treatment effects for EFS and OS, indicating that improvements in EFS are likely to be predictive of improvements in OS. EFS may therefore be a reliable surrogate for OS after neoadjuvant therapy in r-NSCLC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy (ISSN 1473-7140) provides expert appraisal and commentary on the major trends in cancer care and highlights the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic approaches. Coverage includes tumor management, novel medicines, anticancer agents and chemotherapy, biological therapy, cancer vaccines, therapeutic indications, biomarkers and diagnostics, and treatment guidelines. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the journal makes an essential contribution to decision-making in cancer care. Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections: Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信