影响CAD-CAM层压板长期临床性能因素的回顾性评价。

Nazmiye Sen, Ryan C Olley
{"title":"影响CAD-CAM层压板长期临床性能因素的回顾性评价。","authors":"Nazmiye Sen, Ryan C Olley","doi":"10.11607/ijp.8499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the clinical performance of CAD/CAM laminate veneers placed by a single operator and systematically evaluated for up to 10 years.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 197 laminate veneers fabricated using either feldspathic ceramics (VMII) or lithium disilicate ceramics (EmaxCAD) were followed up to 10 years in 32 patients. Technical, esthetic, and biologic findings of each restoration were evaluated using modified United States Public Health Service criteria. The survival and complication rates were assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and compared using log-rank test. Statistical significance was set at P < .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The estimated Kaplan-Meier survival rate was 91.9% after the mean observation period. According to the ceramic system used, the estimated Kaplan-Meier survival rate amounted to 92.7% for EmaxCAD and 89.1% for VMII. Survival rates were significantly affected by the location of veneer according to log-rank test (P < .05). A range of survival rates between 83.3% and 98.6% were observed based on the location of veneer.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CAD/CAM laminate veneers milled from feldspathic or lithium disilicate ceramics have comparable long-term survival rates. Oral positioning affects the survival of veneers. Veneers of incisors have higher survival rates than the veneers of maxillary canines and premolars.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":"0 0","pages":"411-416"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retrospective Evaluation of Factors Affecting Long-Term Clinical Performance of CAD/CAM Laminate Veneers.\",\"authors\":\"Nazmiye Sen, Ryan C Olley\",\"doi\":\"10.11607/ijp.8499\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the clinical performance of CAD/CAM laminate veneers placed by a single operator and systematically evaluated for up to 10 years.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 197 laminate veneers fabricated using either feldspathic ceramics (VMII) or lithium disilicate ceramics (EmaxCAD) were followed up to 10 years in 32 patients. Technical, esthetic, and biologic findings of each restoration were evaluated using modified United States Public Health Service criteria. The survival and complication rates were assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and compared using log-rank test. Statistical significance was set at P < .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The estimated Kaplan-Meier survival rate was 91.9% after the mean observation period. According to the ceramic system used, the estimated Kaplan-Meier survival rate amounted to 92.7% for EmaxCAD and 89.1% for VMII. Survival rates were significantly affected by the location of veneer according to log-rank test (P < .05). A range of survival rates between 83.3% and 98.6% were observed based on the location of veneer.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CAD/CAM laminate veneers milled from feldspathic or lithium disilicate ceramics have comparable long-term survival rates. Oral positioning affects the survival of veneers. Veneers of incisors have higher survival rates than the veneers of maxillary canines and premolars.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International journal of prosthodontics\",\"volume\":\"0 0\",\"pages\":\"411-416\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International journal of prosthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.8499\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.8499","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估由一名操作员放置的CAD-CAM层压板的临床性能,并对其进行长达10年的系统评估。材料和方法:对32名患者的197块使用长石陶瓷(VMII)或二硅酸锂陶瓷(EmaxCAD)制造的层压板进行了长达10年的随访。使用修改后的美国公共卫生服务标准对每种修复的技术、美学和生物学结果进行评估。使用Kaplan-Meier生存分析评估生存率和并发症发生率,并使用Log-Rank检验进行比较。结果:平均观察期后Kaplan-Meier生存率为91.9%。根据所使用的陶瓷系统,估计Emax CAD的Kaplan-Meier生存率为92.7%,VMII的Kaplan-Maier生存率为89.1%。根据对数秩检验,单板位置对存活率有显著影响(p<0.05)。根据单板位置,存活率在83.3%至98.6%之间。结论:用长石或二硅酸锂陶瓷研磨的CAD-CAM层压板具有相当的长期存活率。口腔定位影响贴面的生存。门牙贴面的成活率高于上颌犬齿和前磨牙贴面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Retrospective Evaluation of Factors Affecting Long-Term Clinical Performance of CAD/CAM Laminate Veneers.

Purpose: To assess the clinical performance of CAD/CAM laminate veneers placed by a single operator and systematically evaluated for up to 10 years.

Materials and methods: A total of 197 laminate veneers fabricated using either feldspathic ceramics (VMII) or lithium disilicate ceramics (EmaxCAD) were followed up to 10 years in 32 patients. Technical, esthetic, and biologic findings of each restoration were evaluated using modified United States Public Health Service criteria. The survival and complication rates were assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and compared using log-rank test. Statistical significance was set at P < .05.

Results: The estimated Kaplan-Meier survival rate was 91.9% after the mean observation period. According to the ceramic system used, the estimated Kaplan-Meier survival rate amounted to 92.7% for EmaxCAD and 89.1% for VMII. Survival rates were significantly affected by the location of veneer according to log-rank test (P < .05). A range of survival rates between 83.3% and 98.6% were observed based on the location of veneer.

Conclusions: CAD/CAM laminate veneers milled from feldspathic or lithium disilicate ceramics have comparable long-term survival rates. Oral positioning affects the survival of veneers. Veneers of incisors have higher survival rates than the veneers of maxillary canines and premolars.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信