{"title":"单片CAD-CAM层压板在不同树脂水泥色调和基底颜色上的遮蔽能力。","authors":"Nazmiye Sen, Bulent Sermet","doi":"10.11607/ijp.8533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the masking ability of monolithic CAD/CAM veneers placed over different resin cement shades and substrate colors.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Veneers were milled from four different monolithic CAD/CAM restorative materials: feldspathic ceramic (VMII), lithium disilicate ceramic (Emax CAD), zirconiareinforced lithium silicate ceramic (VS), and high-translucency zirconia ceramic (YZ-XT). Veneers were luted on natural tooth-colored (ND1) or discolored substrates (ND3 or ND5) using two different resin cement shades (opaque white or translucent). Each CAD/CAM material, resin cement shade, and substrate combination comprised 9 sample veneers (N = 216). Color parameters were obtained using a dental spectrophotometer before and after luting. Color differences (ΔE00) were calculated using CIEDE2000 formula and compared to perceptibility (P = .81 ΔE00 units) and acceptability (AT = 1.77 ΔE00 units) visual thresholds. Color variation data were statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests with Bonferroni-Holm correction (α = .05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The highest ΔE00 value was obtained in the VMII group placed over a discolored substrate, followed by the Emax CAD, YZ-XT, and VS groups. The effect of material types on ΔE00 values was significantly observed when the veneers were luted on discolored substrates using translucent resin cement (P < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Restorative material type, substrate color, and resin cement shade affect the masking ability of monolithic CAD/CAM laminate veneers.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":"0 0","pages":"540-546"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Masking Ability of Monolithic CAD/CAM Laminate Veneers Over Different Resin Cement Shades and Substrate Colors.\",\"authors\":\"Nazmiye Sen, Bulent Sermet\",\"doi\":\"10.11607/ijp.8533\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the masking ability of monolithic CAD/CAM veneers placed over different resin cement shades and substrate colors.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Veneers were milled from four different monolithic CAD/CAM restorative materials: feldspathic ceramic (VMII), lithium disilicate ceramic (Emax CAD), zirconiareinforced lithium silicate ceramic (VS), and high-translucency zirconia ceramic (YZ-XT). Veneers were luted on natural tooth-colored (ND1) or discolored substrates (ND3 or ND5) using two different resin cement shades (opaque white or translucent). Each CAD/CAM material, resin cement shade, and substrate combination comprised 9 sample veneers (N = 216). Color parameters were obtained using a dental spectrophotometer before and after luting. Color differences (ΔE00) were calculated using CIEDE2000 formula and compared to perceptibility (P = .81 ΔE00 units) and acceptability (AT = 1.77 ΔE00 units) visual thresholds. Color variation data were statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests with Bonferroni-Holm correction (α = .05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The highest ΔE00 value was obtained in the VMII group placed over a discolored substrate, followed by the Emax CAD, YZ-XT, and VS groups. The effect of material types on ΔE00 values was significantly observed when the veneers were luted on discolored substrates using translucent resin cement (P < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Restorative material type, substrate color, and resin cement shade affect the masking ability of monolithic CAD/CAM laminate veneers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International journal of prosthodontics\",\"volume\":\"0 0\",\"pages\":\"540-546\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International journal of prosthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.8533\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.8533","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Masking Ability of Monolithic CAD/CAM Laminate Veneers Over Different Resin Cement Shades and Substrate Colors.
Purpose: To compare the masking ability of monolithic CAD/CAM veneers placed over different resin cement shades and substrate colors.
Materials and methods: Veneers were milled from four different monolithic CAD/CAM restorative materials: feldspathic ceramic (VMII), lithium disilicate ceramic (Emax CAD), zirconiareinforced lithium silicate ceramic (VS), and high-translucency zirconia ceramic (YZ-XT). Veneers were luted on natural tooth-colored (ND1) or discolored substrates (ND3 or ND5) using two different resin cement shades (opaque white or translucent). Each CAD/CAM material, resin cement shade, and substrate combination comprised 9 sample veneers (N = 216). Color parameters were obtained using a dental spectrophotometer before and after luting. Color differences (ΔE00) were calculated using CIEDE2000 formula and compared to perceptibility (P = .81 ΔE00 units) and acceptability (AT = 1.77 ΔE00 units) visual thresholds. Color variation data were statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests with Bonferroni-Holm correction (α = .05).
Results: The highest ΔE00 value was obtained in the VMII group placed over a discolored substrate, followed by the Emax CAD, YZ-XT, and VS groups. The effect of material types on ΔE00 values was significantly observed when the veneers were luted on discolored substrates using translucent resin cement (P < .05).
Conclusions: Restorative material type, substrate color, and resin cement shade affect the masking ability of monolithic CAD/CAM laminate veneers.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
