西巴尔干地区因健康保险基金规定而发生的工作场所暴力和对家庭医生的制裁。

Tanja Pekez-Pavlisko, Maja Racic, Larisa Gavran, Danica Rotar Pavlic, Ljubin Sukriev, Slavoljub R Zivanovic, Dinka Jurisic
{"title":"西巴尔干地区因健康保险基金规定而发生的工作场所暴力和对家庭医生的制裁。","authors":"Tanja Pekez-Pavlisko,&nbsp;Maja Racic,&nbsp;Larisa Gavran,&nbsp;Danica Rotar Pavlic,&nbsp;Ljubin Sukriev,&nbsp;Slavoljub R Zivanovic,&nbsp;Dinka Jurisic","doi":"10.5455/msm.2019.31.99-104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>After family medicine's famous beginnings in the early 60's through introduction of the world's first family medicine specialization, with transitional changes and war also come changes in former Yugoslavia's healthcare systems.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The primary aim of this article is to analyze frequency and causes of sanctioning of family physicians by Health insurance funds in the countries of former Yugoslavia. The secondary aim is to evaluate frequency and types of workplace violence family physicians experienced due to insurance boundaries for patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The comparative, cross-sectional survey was carried out from October 2017 to February 2018. Study participants were general practitioners' (GPs), family physicians (FPs) and those without a specialty designation but providing family medicine services in one of the five Western Balkans countries: Croatia, Slovenia, Serbia, Macedonia and Bosnia and Herzegovina (B&H). The questionnaire was designed for the purpose of the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-nine percent of participating physicians have been sanctioned by Health Insurance Fund and 77. 5% has been exposed to workplace violence. The most common type of violence was verbal (76.6%). Financial penalties according to the scale had the highest rates in Macedonia (73.9%) and Slovenia (43.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is necessary to educate creators of healthcare policies, doctors and patients for the purpose of establishing partner relations which would lead to strengthening of primary healthcare, but also to a more efficient healthcare system.</p>","PeriodicalId":94128,"journal":{"name":"Materia socio-medica","volume":"31 2","pages":"99-104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/36/01/MSM-31-99.PMC6690306.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Workplace Violence and Sanctioning of Family Medicine Physicians Due to the Rules of Health Insurance Funds in the Western Balkan.\",\"authors\":\"Tanja Pekez-Pavlisko,&nbsp;Maja Racic,&nbsp;Larisa Gavran,&nbsp;Danica Rotar Pavlic,&nbsp;Ljubin Sukriev,&nbsp;Slavoljub R Zivanovic,&nbsp;Dinka Jurisic\",\"doi\":\"10.5455/msm.2019.31.99-104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>After family medicine's famous beginnings in the early 60's through introduction of the world's first family medicine specialization, with transitional changes and war also come changes in former Yugoslavia's healthcare systems.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The primary aim of this article is to analyze frequency and causes of sanctioning of family physicians by Health insurance funds in the countries of former Yugoslavia. The secondary aim is to evaluate frequency and types of workplace violence family physicians experienced due to insurance boundaries for patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The comparative, cross-sectional survey was carried out from October 2017 to February 2018. Study participants were general practitioners' (GPs), family physicians (FPs) and those without a specialty designation but providing family medicine services in one of the five Western Balkans countries: Croatia, Slovenia, Serbia, Macedonia and Bosnia and Herzegovina (B&H). The questionnaire was designed for the purpose of the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-nine percent of participating physicians have been sanctioned by Health Insurance Fund and 77. 5% has been exposed to workplace violence. The most common type of violence was verbal (76.6%). Financial penalties according to the scale had the highest rates in Macedonia (73.9%) and Slovenia (43.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is necessary to educate creators of healthcare policies, doctors and patients for the purpose of establishing partner relations which would lead to strengthening of primary healthcare, but also to a more efficient healthcare system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Materia socio-medica\",\"volume\":\"31 2\",\"pages\":\"99-104\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/36/01/MSM-31-99.PMC6690306.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Materia socio-medica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5455/msm.2019.31.99-104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materia socio-medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/msm.2019.31.99-104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

引言:在60年代初家庭医学的著名开端之后,通过引入世界上第一个家庭医学专业,随着过渡时期的变化和战争,前南斯拉夫的医疗体系也发生了变化。目的:本文的主要目的是分析前南斯拉夫国家医疗保险基金制裁家庭医生的频率和原因。第二个目的是评估家庭医生因患者保险边界而经历的工作场所暴力的频率和类型。方法:2017年10月至2018年2月进行横断面比较调查。研究参与者包括全科医生(GP)、家庭医生(FP)以及那些没有专业名称但在西巴尔干五个国家之一提供家庭医学服务的人:克罗地亚、斯洛文尼亚、塞尔维亚、马其顿和波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那(B&H)。调查问卷是为研究目的而设计的。结果:49%的参与医生得到了健康保险基金的批准,77名。5%的人曾遭受过工作场所的暴力。最常见的暴力类型是言语暴力(76.6%)。马其顿(73.9%)和斯洛文尼亚(43.9%)的经济处罚率最高。结论:有必要教育医疗政策的制定者、医生和患者,以建立伙伴关系,从而加强初级医疗保健,而且还涉及更高效的医疗保健系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Workplace Violence and Sanctioning of Family Medicine Physicians Due to the Rules of Health Insurance Funds in the Western Balkan.

Introduction: After family medicine's famous beginnings in the early 60's through introduction of the world's first family medicine specialization, with transitional changes and war also come changes in former Yugoslavia's healthcare systems.

Aim: The primary aim of this article is to analyze frequency and causes of sanctioning of family physicians by Health insurance funds in the countries of former Yugoslavia. The secondary aim is to evaluate frequency and types of workplace violence family physicians experienced due to insurance boundaries for patients.

Methods: The comparative, cross-sectional survey was carried out from October 2017 to February 2018. Study participants were general practitioners' (GPs), family physicians (FPs) and those without a specialty designation but providing family medicine services in one of the five Western Balkans countries: Croatia, Slovenia, Serbia, Macedonia and Bosnia and Herzegovina (B&H). The questionnaire was designed for the purpose of the study.

Results: Forty-nine percent of participating physicians have been sanctioned by Health Insurance Fund and 77. 5% has been exposed to workplace violence. The most common type of violence was verbal (76.6%). Financial penalties according to the scale had the highest rates in Macedonia (73.9%) and Slovenia (43.9%).

Conclusion: It is necessary to educate creators of healthcare policies, doctors and patients for the purpose of establishing partner relations which would lead to strengthening of primary healthcare, but also to a more efficient healthcare system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信