中风后疲劳研究路线图:第三次中风恢复和康复圆桌会议基于共识的核心建议。

Neurorehabilitation and neural repair Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-14 DOI:10.1177/15459683231209170
Coralie English, Dawn B Simpson, Sandra A Billinger, Leonid Churilov, Kirsten G Coupland, Avril Drummond, Annapoorna Kuppuswamy, Mansur A Kutlubaev, Anners Lerdal, Amreen Mahmood, G Lorimer Moseley, Quentin J Pittman, Ellyn A Riley, Brad A Sutherland, Connie Hy Wong, Dale Corbett, Gillian Mead
{"title":"中风后疲劳研究路线图:第三次中风恢复和康复圆桌会议基于共识的核心建议。","authors":"Coralie English, Dawn B Simpson, Sandra A Billinger, Leonid Churilov, Kirsten G Coupland, Avril Drummond, Annapoorna Kuppuswamy, Mansur A Kutlubaev, Anners Lerdal, Amreen Mahmood, G Lorimer Moseley, Quentin J Pittman, Ellyn A Riley, Brad A Sutherland, Connie Hy Wong, Dale Corbett, Gillian Mead","doi":"10.1177/15459683231209170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Fatigue affects almost half of all people living with stroke. Stroke survivors rank understanding fatigue and how to reduce it as one of the highest research priorities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We convened an interdisciplinary, international group of clinical and pre-clinical researchers and lived experience experts. We identified four priority areas: (1) best measurement tools for research, (2) clinical identification of fatigue and potentially modifiable causes, (3) promising interventions and recommendations for future trials, and (4) possible biological mechanisms of fatigue. Cross-cutting themes were aphasia and the voice of people with lived experience. Working parties were formed and structured consensus building processes were followed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We present 20 recommendations covering outcome measures for research, development, and testing of new interventions and priority areas for future research on the biology of post-stroke fatigue. We developed and recommend the use of the Stroke Fatigue Clinical Assessment Tool.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>By synthesizing current knowledge in post-stroke fatigue across clinical and pre-clinical fields, our work provides a roadmap for future research into post-stroke fatigue.</p>","PeriodicalId":94158,"journal":{"name":"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair","volume":" ","pages":"7-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A roadmap for research in post-stroke fatigue: Consensus-based core recommendations from the third Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable.\",\"authors\":\"Coralie English, Dawn B Simpson, Sandra A Billinger, Leonid Churilov, Kirsten G Coupland, Avril Drummond, Annapoorna Kuppuswamy, Mansur A Kutlubaev, Anners Lerdal, Amreen Mahmood, G Lorimer Moseley, Quentin J Pittman, Ellyn A Riley, Brad A Sutherland, Connie Hy Wong, Dale Corbett, Gillian Mead\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15459683231209170\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Fatigue affects almost half of all people living with stroke. Stroke survivors rank understanding fatigue and how to reduce it as one of the highest research priorities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We convened an interdisciplinary, international group of clinical and pre-clinical researchers and lived experience experts. We identified four priority areas: (1) best measurement tools for research, (2) clinical identification of fatigue and potentially modifiable causes, (3) promising interventions and recommendations for future trials, and (4) possible biological mechanisms of fatigue. Cross-cutting themes were aphasia and the voice of people with lived experience. Working parties were formed and structured consensus building processes were followed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We present 20 recommendations covering outcome measures for research, development, and testing of new interventions and priority areas for future research on the biology of post-stroke fatigue. We developed and recommend the use of the Stroke Fatigue Clinical Assessment Tool.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>By synthesizing current knowledge in post-stroke fatigue across clinical and pre-clinical fields, our work provides a roadmap for future research into post-stroke fatigue.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"7-18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683231209170\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683231209170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理由:几乎一半的中风患者都患有疲劳。中风幸存者将理解疲劳以及如何减少疲劳列为最高研究重点之一。方法:我们召集了一个跨学科的国际临床和临床前研究人员和生活经验专家小组。我们确定了四个优先领域:(1)研究的最佳测量工具,(2)疲劳和潜在可改变原因的临床识别,(3)有希望的干预措施和未来试验的建议,以及(4)疲劳的可能生物学机制。跨领域的主题是失语症和有生活经验的人的声音。成立了工作组,并遵循了结构化的建立共识进程。结果:我们提出了20项建议,涵盖了新干预措施的研究、开发和测试的结果指标,以及未来卒中后疲劳生物学研究的优先领域。我们开发并推荐使用卒中后疲劳临床评估工具。结论:通过综合临床和临床前领域卒中后疲劳的现有知识,我们的工作为未来研究卒中后疲劳提供了路线图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A roadmap for research in post-stroke fatigue: Consensus-based core recommendations from the third Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable.

Rationale: Fatigue affects almost half of all people living with stroke. Stroke survivors rank understanding fatigue and how to reduce it as one of the highest research priorities.

Methods: We convened an interdisciplinary, international group of clinical and pre-clinical researchers and lived experience experts. We identified four priority areas: (1) best measurement tools for research, (2) clinical identification of fatigue and potentially modifiable causes, (3) promising interventions and recommendations for future trials, and (4) possible biological mechanisms of fatigue. Cross-cutting themes were aphasia and the voice of people with lived experience. Working parties were formed and structured consensus building processes were followed.

Results: We present 20 recommendations covering outcome measures for research, development, and testing of new interventions and priority areas for future research on the biology of post-stroke fatigue. We developed and recommend the use of the Stroke Fatigue Clinical Assessment Tool.

Conclusions: By synthesizing current knowledge in post-stroke fatigue across clinical and pre-clinical fields, our work provides a roadmap for future research into post-stroke fatigue.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信