地理信息系统在体育活动干预中的应用:系统综述。

Progress in preventive medicine (New York, N.Y.) Pub Date : 2019-06-14 eCollection Date: 2019-06-01 DOI:10.1097/pp9.0000000000000022
Liliana Aguayo, Mariha Khan, Reynaldo De Leon, Andiara Schwingel
{"title":"地理信息系统在体育活动干预中的应用:系统综述。","authors":"Liliana Aguayo,&nbsp;Mariha Khan,&nbsp;Reynaldo De Leon,&nbsp;Andiara Schwingel","doi":"10.1097/pp9.0000000000000022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The promotion of physical activity is inextricably dependent on the environment. This systematic review summarizes studies that used geographic information systems to account for the role of geographic features in the design, implementation, or evaluation of interventions that promoted physical activity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pubmed, ProQuest/PsycInfo, and Cochrane Library were searched for physical activity interventions that employed geographic information systems. The search was conducted with an algorithm that included 10 geographic, 28 intervention, and 9 physical activity search terms. Data were systematically reviewed using a standardized form based on the PICOS framework (participants, interventions, comparison, outcomes, and study design). Quality of the studies included was independently rated on 14 criteria (Registration number CRD42016046011).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Search yield 12,518 published articles, of which, 19 studies satisfied our inclusion criteria. Proximity to recreational areas and neighborhood walkability were the most common geographic factors measured in studies of physical activity interventions. Interventions focused on supporting physical activity by providing recreational spaces and adequate infrastructure to participants. Fifteen intervention studies assessed socioeconomic environmental factors along with physical environmental factors. Support groups were introduced by 4 of the interventions to offset social environmental barriers in the geographical environment. Given the lack of consistency in measurements of physical activity, and long-term assessments, it was not possible to determine if findings are attributable to the geographic environment or a novelty effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>More research is needed to better understand the physical and social factors within the geographic environment that work as barriers or facilitators of physical activity changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":92284,"journal":{"name":"Progress in preventive medicine (New York, N.Y.)","volume":"4 2","pages":"e0022"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/pp9.0000000000000022","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of Geographic Information Systems in Physical Activity Interventions: a Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Liliana Aguayo,&nbsp;Mariha Khan,&nbsp;Reynaldo De Leon,&nbsp;Andiara Schwingel\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/pp9.0000000000000022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The promotion of physical activity is inextricably dependent on the environment. This systematic review summarizes studies that used geographic information systems to account for the role of geographic features in the design, implementation, or evaluation of interventions that promoted physical activity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pubmed, ProQuest/PsycInfo, and Cochrane Library were searched for physical activity interventions that employed geographic information systems. The search was conducted with an algorithm that included 10 geographic, 28 intervention, and 9 physical activity search terms. Data were systematically reviewed using a standardized form based on the PICOS framework (participants, interventions, comparison, outcomes, and study design). Quality of the studies included was independently rated on 14 criteria (Registration number CRD42016046011).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Search yield 12,518 published articles, of which, 19 studies satisfied our inclusion criteria. Proximity to recreational areas and neighborhood walkability were the most common geographic factors measured in studies of physical activity interventions. Interventions focused on supporting physical activity by providing recreational spaces and adequate infrastructure to participants. Fifteen intervention studies assessed socioeconomic environmental factors along with physical environmental factors. Support groups were introduced by 4 of the interventions to offset social environmental barriers in the geographical environment. Given the lack of consistency in measurements of physical activity, and long-term assessments, it was not possible to determine if findings are attributable to the geographic environment or a novelty effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>More research is needed to better understand the physical and social factors within the geographic environment that work as barriers or facilitators of physical activity changes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":92284,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in preventive medicine (New York, N.Y.)\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"e0022\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/pp9.0000000000000022\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in preventive medicine (New York, N.Y.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/pp9.0000000000000022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in preventive medicine (New York, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/pp9.0000000000000022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

引言:体育活动的促进与环境密不可分。本系统综述总结了使用地理信息系统来说明地理特征在促进体育活动的干预措施的设计、实施或评估中的作用的研究。方法:检索Pubmed、ProQuest/PsycInfo和Cochrane图书馆中使用地理信息系统的体育活动干预措施。搜索使用的算法包括10个地理搜索项、28个干预搜索项和9个身体活动搜索项。使用基于PICOS框架的标准化表格(参与者、干预措施、比较、结果和研究设计)对数据进行系统审查。纳入研究的质量根据14项标准(注册号CRD42016046011)进行了独立评分。结果:搜索产生12518篇发表文章,其中19项研究符合我们的纳入标准。在体育活动干预研究中,接近娱乐区和社区可步行性是最常见的地理因素。干预措施的重点是通过为参与者提供娱乐空间和充足的基础设施来支持体育活动。15项干预研究评估了社会经济环境因素和物理环境因素。其中4项干预措施引入了支持小组,以抵消地理环境中的社会环境障碍。鉴于对体力活动的测量和长期评估缺乏一致性,无法确定这些发现是由于地理环境还是新颖性影响。结论:需要更多的研究来更好地了解地理环境中的身体和社会因素,这些因素是身体活动变化的障碍或促进因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Use of Geographic Information Systems in Physical Activity Interventions: a Systematic Review.

Use of Geographic Information Systems in Physical Activity Interventions: a Systematic Review.

Use of Geographic Information Systems in Physical Activity Interventions: a Systematic Review.

Use of Geographic Information Systems in Physical Activity Interventions: a Systematic Review.

Introduction: The promotion of physical activity is inextricably dependent on the environment. This systematic review summarizes studies that used geographic information systems to account for the role of geographic features in the design, implementation, or evaluation of interventions that promoted physical activity.

Methods: Pubmed, ProQuest/PsycInfo, and Cochrane Library were searched for physical activity interventions that employed geographic information systems. The search was conducted with an algorithm that included 10 geographic, 28 intervention, and 9 physical activity search terms. Data were systematically reviewed using a standardized form based on the PICOS framework (participants, interventions, comparison, outcomes, and study design). Quality of the studies included was independently rated on 14 criteria (Registration number CRD42016046011).

Results: Search yield 12,518 published articles, of which, 19 studies satisfied our inclusion criteria. Proximity to recreational areas and neighborhood walkability were the most common geographic factors measured in studies of physical activity interventions. Interventions focused on supporting physical activity by providing recreational spaces and adequate infrastructure to participants. Fifteen intervention studies assessed socioeconomic environmental factors along with physical environmental factors. Support groups were introduced by 4 of the interventions to offset social environmental barriers in the geographical environment. Given the lack of consistency in measurements of physical activity, and long-term assessments, it was not possible to determine if findings are attributable to the geographic environment or a novelty effect.

Conclusion: More research is needed to better understand the physical and social factors within the geographic environment that work as barriers or facilitators of physical activity changes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信