Andreea Stamate, Jonathan Bertolaccini, Michel Deriaz, Saket Gunjan, Mircea-Dan Marzan, Luiza Spiru
{"title":"Squegg®智能测功机和手持式训练器与Jamar®液压手动测功机之间的仪器间可靠性:试点研究。","authors":"Andreea Stamate, Jonathan Bertolaccini, Michel Deriaz, Saket Gunjan, Mircea-Dan Marzan, Luiza Spiru","doi":"10.5014/ajot.2023.050099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Occupational therapists need dependable and accurate instruments for remote assessments and monitoring of hand functionality. These assessments monitor progress, evaluate interventions, and guide independence goals.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the interinstrument reliability and concurrent validity of the Squegg® Smart Dynamometer and Hand Grip Trainer and the Jamar® Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Repeated-measures design.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Individual clinic in Bucharest, Romania.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Forty middle-age and older adult volunteers, healthy and free from any neuromuscular, orthopedic dysfunction that affected hand strength.</p><p><strong>Outcomes and measures: </strong>Participants' maximal grip strength (MGS) for both their dominant and nondominant hands was measured with both devices. Participants with odd-numbered IDs were measured with the Squegg first and the Jamar second, and those with even-numbered IDs were measured in opposite sequence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Paired-samples t tests on overall mean MGS and mean MGS (three measures on each hand) showed no statistically significant differences between the two devices. Intraclass correlation analysis showed good to excellent interinstrument agreement. Pearson correlations between measurements across all participants, and hands, indicated strong agreement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The Squegg shows promise for health care professionals, including occupational therapists, for grip strength assessment in clinical contexts. What This Article Adds: These results offer initial psychometric data for a new remote MGS measurement device. MGS is crucial for assessing the physical function of aging adults. Reliable measurements from such a device are vital for occupational therapists to guide treatment interventions and assess hand function's impact on daily activities.</p>","PeriodicalId":48317,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interinstrument Reliability Between the Squegg® Smart Dynamometer and Hand Grip Trainer and the Jamar® Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer: A Pilot Study.\",\"authors\":\"Andreea Stamate, Jonathan Bertolaccini, Michel Deriaz, Saket Gunjan, Mircea-Dan Marzan, Luiza Spiru\",\"doi\":\"10.5014/ajot.2023.050099\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Occupational therapists need dependable and accurate instruments for remote assessments and monitoring of hand functionality. These assessments monitor progress, evaluate interventions, and guide independence goals.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the interinstrument reliability and concurrent validity of the Squegg® Smart Dynamometer and Hand Grip Trainer and the Jamar® Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Repeated-measures design.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Individual clinic in Bucharest, Romania.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Forty middle-age and older adult volunteers, healthy and free from any neuromuscular, orthopedic dysfunction that affected hand strength.</p><p><strong>Outcomes and measures: </strong>Participants' maximal grip strength (MGS) for both their dominant and nondominant hands was measured with both devices. Participants with odd-numbered IDs were measured with the Squegg first and the Jamar second, and those with even-numbered IDs were measured in opposite sequence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Paired-samples t tests on overall mean MGS and mean MGS (three measures on each hand) showed no statistically significant differences between the two devices. Intraclass correlation analysis showed good to excellent interinstrument agreement. Pearson correlations between measurements across all participants, and hands, indicated strong agreement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The Squegg shows promise for health care professionals, including occupational therapists, for grip strength assessment in clinical contexts. What This Article Adds: These results offer initial psychometric data for a new remote MGS measurement device. MGS is crucial for assessing the physical function of aging adults. Reliable measurements from such a device are vital for occupational therapists to guide treatment interventions and assess hand function's impact on daily activities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Occupational Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Occupational Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2023.050099\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2023.050099","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Interinstrument Reliability Between the Squegg® Smart Dynamometer and Hand Grip Trainer and the Jamar® Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer: A Pilot Study.
Importance: Occupational therapists need dependable and accurate instruments for remote assessments and monitoring of hand functionality. These assessments monitor progress, evaluate interventions, and guide independence goals.
Objective: To assess the interinstrument reliability and concurrent validity of the Squegg® Smart Dynamometer and Hand Grip Trainer and the Jamar® Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer.
Design: Repeated-measures design.
Setting: Individual clinic in Bucharest, Romania.
Participants: Forty middle-age and older adult volunteers, healthy and free from any neuromuscular, orthopedic dysfunction that affected hand strength.
Outcomes and measures: Participants' maximal grip strength (MGS) for both their dominant and nondominant hands was measured with both devices. Participants with odd-numbered IDs were measured with the Squegg first and the Jamar second, and those with even-numbered IDs were measured in opposite sequence.
Results: Paired-samples t tests on overall mean MGS and mean MGS (three measures on each hand) showed no statistically significant differences between the two devices. Intraclass correlation analysis showed good to excellent interinstrument agreement. Pearson correlations between measurements across all participants, and hands, indicated strong agreement.
Conclusions and relevance: The Squegg shows promise for health care professionals, including occupational therapists, for grip strength assessment in clinical contexts. What This Article Adds: These results offer initial psychometric data for a new remote MGS measurement device. MGS is crucial for assessing the physical function of aging adults. Reliable measurements from such a device are vital for occupational therapists to guide treatment interventions and assess hand function's impact on daily activities.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Occupational Therapy (AJOT) is an official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc. and is published 6 times per year. This peer reviewed journal focuses on research, practice, and health care issues in the field of occupational therapy. AOTA members receive 6 issues of AJOT per year and have online access to archived abstracts and full-text articles. Nonmembers may view abstracts online but must purchase full-text articles.