Oberman&Vink评论：我们应该在评估缺失数据方法的模拟研究中修复或模拟完整的数据吗？

IF 16.4 1区化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2023-10-12 DOI:10.1002/bimj.202300085

Tim P. Morris, Ian R. White, Suzie Cro, Jonathan W. Bartlett, James R. Carpenter, Tra My Pham

引用次数: 0

摘要

对于评估处理缺失数据方法的模拟研究，我们认为，通过固定完整数据和重复模拟缺失指标来生成部分观测数据是一个表面上有吸引力的想法，但很少适合使用。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Comment on Oberman & Vink: Should we fix or simulate the complete data in simulation studies evaluating missing data methods?

For simulation studies that evaluate methods of handling missing data, we argue that generating partially observed data by fixing the complete data and repeatedly simulating the missingness indicators is a superficially attractive idea but only rarely appropriate to use.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合

CiteScore

31.40

自引率

1.10%

发文量

312

审稿时长

2 months

期刊介绍： Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.