ASNR/ASR/ESNR/ESSR“术语3.0”工作组对脊柱成像的国际调查结果。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-10 DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1768247
Gennaro D'Anna, Lubdha Shah, Peter G Kranz, Joshua A Hirsch, M Khan, Michele Johnson, Antoine Feydy, J Nathan, L Manfre, Dan T Nguyen, Gordan Sze, Johan Van Goethem, Filip M Vanhoenacker
{"title":"ASNR/ASR/ESNR/ESSR“术语3.0”工作组对脊柱成像的国际调查结果。","authors":"Gennaro D'Anna,&nbsp;Lubdha Shah,&nbsp;Peter G Kranz,&nbsp;Joshua A Hirsch,&nbsp;M Khan,&nbsp;Michele Johnson,&nbsp;Antoine Feydy,&nbsp;J Nathan,&nbsp;L Manfre,&nbsp;Dan T Nguyen,&nbsp;Gordan Sze,&nbsp;Johan Van Goethem,&nbsp;Filip M Vanhoenacker","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1768247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our goal was to determine if \"Nomenclature 2.0,\" the classification of lumbar disk pathology consensus, should be updated. We conducted a social media and e-mail-based survey on preferences regarding the use of classification on magnetic resonance spine reporting. Members of the European Society of Neuroradiology, European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology, American Society of Neuroradiology, and American Society of Spine Radiology received a 15-question online survey between February and March 2022. A total of 600 responses were received from 63 countries. The largest number of responses came from Italy and the United States. We found that 71.28% of respondents used Nomenclature 2.0, Classification of Lumbar Disk Pathology. But classification on stenosis is used less often: 53.94% and 60% of respondents do not use any classification of spinal canal stenosis and foraminal stenosis, respectively. When queried about which part of Nomenclature needs improving, most respondents asked for a Structured Reporting Template (SRT), even though 58.85% of respondents do not currently use any template and 54% routinely use a clinical information questionnaire. These results highlight the importance of an updated Nomenclature 3.0 version that integrates the classifications of lumbar disk disease and spinal canal and foraminal stenosis. Further attention should also be directed toward developing a robust endorsed SRT.</p>","PeriodicalId":49545,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology","volume":"27 5","pages":"561-565"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Results of an International Survey on Spinal Imaging by the ASNR/ASSR/ESNR/ESSR \\\"Nomenclature 3.0\\\" Working Group.\",\"authors\":\"Gennaro D'Anna,&nbsp;Lubdha Shah,&nbsp;Peter G Kranz,&nbsp;Joshua A Hirsch,&nbsp;M Khan,&nbsp;Michele Johnson,&nbsp;Antoine Feydy,&nbsp;J Nathan,&nbsp;L Manfre,&nbsp;Dan T Nguyen,&nbsp;Gordan Sze,&nbsp;Johan Van Goethem,&nbsp;Filip M Vanhoenacker\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0043-1768247\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Our goal was to determine if \\\"Nomenclature 2.0,\\\" the classification of lumbar disk pathology consensus, should be updated. We conducted a social media and e-mail-based survey on preferences regarding the use of classification on magnetic resonance spine reporting. Members of the European Society of Neuroradiology, European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology, American Society of Neuroradiology, and American Society of Spine Radiology received a 15-question online survey between February and March 2022. A total of 600 responses were received from 63 countries. The largest number of responses came from Italy and the United States. We found that 71.28% of respondents used Nomenclature 2.0, Classification of Lumbar Disk Pathology. But classification on stenosis is used less often: 53.94% and 60% of respondents do not use any classification of spinal canal stenosis and foraminal stenosis, respectively. When queried about which part of Nomenclature needs improving, most respondents asked for a Structured Reporting Template (SRT), even though 58.85% of respondents do not currently use any template and 54% routinely use a clinical information questionnaire. These results highlight the importance of an updated Nomenclature 3.0 version that integrates the classifications of lumbar disk disease and spinal canal and foraminal stenosis. Further attention should also be directed toward developing a robust endorsed SRT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49545,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology\",\"volume\":\"27 5\",\"pages\":\"561-565\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1768247\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1768247","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们的目标是确定是否应该更新腰椎间盘病理学共识分类“命名2.0”。我们进行了一项基于社交媒体和电子邮件的调查,以了解对核磁共振脊柱报告使用分类的偏好。2022年2月至3月,欧洲神经放射学学会、欧洲肌肉骨骼放射学学会、美国神经放射学学会和美国脊柱放射学学会的成员收到了一份15个问题的在线调查。共收到来自63个国家的600份答复。意大利和美国的答复数量最多。我们发现71.28%的受访者使用术语2.0,腰椎间盘病理学分类。但对椎管狭窄的分类使用较少:分别有53.94%和60%的受访者没有对椎管狭窄和椎间孔狭窄进行任何分类。当被问及术语的哪一部分需要改进时,大多数受访者要求提供结构化报告模板(SRT),尽管58.85%的受访者目前没有使用任何模板,54%的受访者通常使用临床信息问卷。这些结果强调了更新的命名法3.0版本的重要性,该版本整合了腰椎间盘疾病、椎管和椎间孔狭窄的分类。还应进一步关注制定一个强有力的认可SRT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Results of an International Survey on Spinal Imaging by the ASNR/ASSR/ESNR/ESSR "Nomenclature 3.0" Working Group.

Our goal was to determine if "Nomenclature 2.0," the classification of lumbar disk pathology consensus, should be updated. We conducted a social media and e-mail-based survey on preferences regarding the use of classification on magnetic resonance spine reporting. Members of the European Society of Neuroradiology, European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology, American Society of Neuroradiology, and American Society of Spine Radiology received a 15-question online survey between February and March 2022. A total of 600 responses were received from 63 countries. The largest number of responses came from Italy and the United States. We found that 71.28% of respondents used Nomenclature 2.0, Classification of Lumbar Disk Pathology. But classification on stenosis is used less often: 53.94% and 60% of respondents do not use any classification of spinal canal stenosis and foraminal stenosis, respectively. When queried about which part of Nomenclature needs improving, most respondents asked for a Structured Reporting Template (SRT), even though 58.85% of respondents do not currently use any template and 54% routinely use a clinical information questionnaire. These results highlight the importance of an updated Nomenclature 3.0 version that integrates the classifications of lumbar disk disease and spinal canal and foraminal stenosis. Further attention should also be directed toward developing a robust endorsed SRT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
112
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology is a review journal that is devoted to musculoskeletal and associated imaging techniques. The journal''s topical issues encompass a broad spectrum of radiological imaging including body MRI imaging, cross sectional radiology, ultrasound and biomechanics. The journal also covers advanced imaging techniques of metabolic bone disease and other areas like the foot and ankle, wrist, spine and other extremities. The journal''s content is suitable for both the practicing radiologist as well as residents in training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信