母语为西班牙语的患者在孕期护理期间的沟通偏好:范围界定综述。

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Luis Rivera MD , Haylie Butler BA , Kevin E. Salinas MD , Carrie Wade MLIS , Maria Bazan MD, MPH , Elysia Larson ScD, MPH , Rose L. Molina MD, MPH
{"title":"母语为西班牙语的患者在孕期护理期间的沟通偏好:范围界定综述。","authors":"Luis Rivera MD ,&nbsp;Haylie Butler BA ,&nbsp;Kevin E. Salinas MD ,&nbsp;Carrie Wade MLIS ,&nbsp;Maria Bazan MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Elysia Larson ScD, MPH ,&nbsp;Rose L. Molina MD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.whi.2023.08.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Qualified language service providers (QLSPs)—professional interpreters or multilingual clinicians certified to provide care in another language—are critical to ensuring meaningful language access for patients. Designing patient-centered systems for language access could improve quality of pregnancy care.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>We synthesized and identified gaps in knowledge about communication preferences during pregnancy care among patients with Spanish primary language.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We performed a scoping review of original research studies published between 2000 and 2022 that assessed communication preferences in Spanish-speaking populations during pregnancy care. Studies underwent title, abstract, and full-text review by three investigators. Data were extracted for synthesis and thematic analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We retrieved 1,539 studies. After title/abstract screening, 36 studies underwent full-text review, and 13 of them met inclusion criteria. Two additional studies were included after reference tracing. This yielded a total of 15 studies comprising qualitative (<em>n</em> = 7), quantitative (<em>n</em> = 4), and mixed-methods (<em>n</em> = 4) studies. Three communication preference themes were identified: language access through QLSPs (<em>n</em> = 7); interpersonal dynamics and perceptions of quality of care (<em>n</em> = 9); and information provision and shared decision-making (<em>n</em><span><span> = 8). Although seven studies reported a strong patient preference to receive prenatal care from Spanish-speaking clinicians, none of the included studies assessed clinician </span>Spanish language proficiency or QLSP categorization.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Few studies have assessed communication preferences during pregnancy care among patients with primary Spanish language. Future studies to improve communication during pregnancy care for patients with primary Spanish language require intentional analysis of their communication preferences, including precision regarding language proficiency among clinicians.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48039,"journal":{"name":"Womens Health Issues","volume":"34 2","pages":"Pages 164-171"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Communication Preferences During Pregnancy Care Among Patients With Primary Spanish Language: A Scoping Review\",\"authors\":\"Luis Rivera MD ,&nbsp;Haylie Butler BA ,&nbsp;Kevin E. Salinas MD ,&nbsp;Carrie Wade MLIS ,&nbsp;Maria Bazan MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Elysia Larson ScD, MPH ,&nbsp;Rose L. Molina MD, MPH\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.whi.2023.08.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Qualified language service providers (QLSPs)—professional interpreters or multilingual clinicians certified to provide care in another language—are critical to ensuring meaningful language access for patients. Designing patient-centered systems for language access could improve quality of pregnancy care.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>We synthesized and identified gaps in knowledge about communication preferences during pregnancy care among patients with Spanish primary language.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We performed a scoping review of original research studies published between 2000 and 2022 that assessed communication preferences in Spanish-speaking populations during pregnancy care. Studies underwent title, abstract, and full-text review by three investigators. Data were extracted for synthesis and thematic analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We retrieved 1,539 studies. After title/abstract screening, 36 studies underwent full-text review, and 13 of them met inclusion criteria. Two additional studies were included after reference tracing. This yielded a total of 15 studies comprising qualitative (<em>n</em> = 7), quantitative (<em>n</em> = 4), and mixed-methods (<em>n</em> = 4) studies. Three communication preference themes were identified: language access through QLSPs (<em>n</em> = 7); interpersonal dynamics and perceptions of quality of care (<em>n</em> = 9); and information provision and shared decision-making (<em>n</em><span><span> = 8). Although seven studies reported a strong patient preference to receive prenatal care from Spanish-speaking clinicians, none of the included studies assessed clinician </span>Spanish language proficiency or QLSP categorization.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Few studies have assessed communication preferences during pregnancy care among patients with primary Spanish language. Future studies to improve communication during pregnancy care for patients with primary Spanish language require intentional analysis of their communication preferences, including precision regarding language proficiency among clinicians.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Womens Health Issues\",\"volume\":\"34 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 164-171\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Womens Health Issues\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S104938672300155X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Womens Health Issues","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S104938672300155X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:合格的语言服务提供商(QLSP)-专业口译员或多语言临床医生,经认证可以用另一种语言提供护理,这对于确保患者有意义地使用语言至关重要。设计以患者为中心的语言访问系统可以提高妊娠护理的质量。目的:我们综合并确定了西班牙语母语患者在孕期护理期间沟通偏好方面的知识差距。方法:我们对2000年至2022年间发表的原始研究进行了范围界定审查,这些研究评估了西班牙语人群在孕期护理期间的沟通偏好。三名研究人员对研究进行了标题、摘要和全文审查。提取数据进行综合和专题分析。结果:我们检索了1539项研究。在标题/摘要筛选后,36项研究进行了全文审查,其中13项符合纳入标准。参考文献追踪后纳入了另外两项研究。这一共产生了15项研究,包括定性研究(n=7)、定量研究(n=4)和混合方法研究(n=4)。确定了三个交流偏好主题:通过QLSP获得语言(n=7);人际动态和对护理质量的感知(n=9);以及信息提供和共同决策(n=8)。尽管有七项研究报告称,患者强烈倾向于接受西班牙语临床医生的产前护理,但没有一项纳入的研究评估临床医生的西班牙语水平或QLSP分类。结论:很少有研究评估母语为西班牙语的患者在孕期护理期间的沟通偏好。未来改善原发西班牙语患者妊娠期沟通护理的研究需要有意分析他们的沟通偏好,包括临床医生对语言熟练度的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Communication Preferences During Pregnancy Care Among Patients With Primary Spanish Language: A Scoping Review

Background

Qualified language service providers (QLSPs)—professional interpreters or multilingual clinicians certified to provide care in another language—are critical to ensuring meaningful language access for patients. Designing patient-centered systems for language access could improve quality of pregnancy care.

Objective

We synthesized and identified gaps in knowledge about communication preferences during pregnancy care among patients with Spanish primary language.

Methods

We performed a scoping review of original research studies published between 2000 and 2022 that assessed communication preferences in Spanish-speaking populations during pregnancy care. Studies underwent title, abstract, and full-text review by three investigators. Data were extracted for synthesis and thematic analysis.

Results

We retrieved 1,539 studies. After title/abstract screening, 36 studies underwent full-text review, and 13 of them met inclusion criteria. Two additional studies were included after reference tracing. This yielded a total of 15 studies comprising qualitative (n = 7), quantitative (n = 4), and mixed-methods (n = 4) studies. Three communication preference themes were identified: language access through QLSPs (n = 7); interpersonal dynamics and perceptions of quality of care (n = 9); and information provision and shared decision-making (n = 8). Although seven studies reported a strong patient preference to receive prenatal care from Spanish-speaking clinicians, none of the included studies assessed clinician Spanish language proficiency or QLSP categorization.

Conclusions

Few studies have assessed communication preferences during pregnancy care among patients with primary Spanish language. Future studies to improve communication during pregnancy care for patients with primary Spanish language require intentional analysis of their communication preferences, including precision regarding language proficiency among clinicians.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: Women"s Health Issues (WHI) is a peer-reviewed, bimonthly, multidisciplinary journal that publishes research and review manuscripts related to women"s health care and policy. As the official journal of the Jacobs Institute of Women"s Health, it is dedicated to improving the health and health care of all women throughout the lifespan and in diverse communities. The journal seeks to inform health services researchers, health care and public health professionals, social scientists, policymakers, and others concerned with women"s health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信