68Ga-PMSA正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描对前列腺癌症的术前评估:与磁共振成像和组织病理学结果的比较。

Q3 Medicine
Camila Edith Stachera Stasiak, Athos Cardillo, Sergio Altino de Almeida, Rosana Souza Rodrigues, Paulo Henrique Rosado de Castro, Daniella Braz Parente
{"title":"68Ga-PMSA正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描对前列腺癌症的术前评估:与磁共振成像和组织病理学结果的比较。","authors":"Camila Edith Stachera Stasiak,&nbsp;Athos Cardillo,&nbsp;Sergio Altino de Almeida,&nbsp;Rosana Souza Rodrigues,&nbsp;Paulo Henrique Rosado de Castro,&nbsp;Daniella Braz Parente","doi":"10.1590/0100-3984.2022.0122-en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the accuracy of preoperative positron emission tomography/computed tomography with <sup>68</sup>Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (<sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA PET/CT) for staging prostate cancer and compare it with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using histopathology of surgical specimens as the gold standard.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, 65 patients with prostate cancer were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The accuracy of <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA PET/CT for tumor detection was 95%, and that of MRI was 91%. There was no difference between <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA PET/CT and MRI regarding localization of the lesion. The sensitivity of <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA PET/CT for detecting extraprostatic extension was quite low (14%). For detection of seminal vesicle invasion, <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA PET/CT showed a sensitivity of 57% and accuracy of 91%. There was a moderate correlation between the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and the serum level of prostate-specific antigen (<i>p</i> < 0.01; ρ = 0.368) and between the SUVmax and the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade (<i>p</i> < 0.01; ρ = 0.513).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong><sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA PET/CT is a promising tool for detecting and evaluating the primary tumor, which can alter the staging and management of the disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":20842,"journal":{"name":"Radiologia Brasileira","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10567085/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preoperative evaluation of prostate cancer by <sup>68</sup>Ga-PMSA positron emission tomography/computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and with histopathological findings.\",\"authors\":\"Camila Edith Stachera Stasiak,&nbsp;Athos Cardillo,&nbsp;Sergio Altino de Almeida,&nbsp;Rosana Souza Rodrigues,&nbsp;Paulo Henrique Rosado de Castro,&nbsp;Daniella Braz Parente\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/0100-3984.2022.0122-en\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the accuracy of preoperative positron emission tomography/computed tomography with <sup>68</sup>Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (<sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA PET/CT) for staging prostate cancer and compare it with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using histopathology of surgical specimens as the gold standard.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, 65 patients with prostate cancer were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The accuracy of <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA PET/CT for tumor detection was 95%, and that of MRI was 91%. There was no difference between <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA PET/CT and MRI regarding localization of the lesion. The sensitivity of <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA PET/CT for detecting extraprostatic extension was quite low (14%). For detection of seminal vesicle invasion, <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA PET/CT showed a sensitivity of 57% and accuracy of 91%. There was a moderate correlation between the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and the serum level of prostate-specific antigen (<i>p</i> < 0.01; ρ = 0.368) and between the SUVmax and the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade (<i>p</i> < 0.01; ρ = 0.513).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong><sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA PET/CT is a promising tool for detecting and evaluating the primary tumor, which can alter the staging and management of the disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiologia Brasileira\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10567085/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiologia Brasileira\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2022.0122-en\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiologia Brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2022.0122-en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价68Ga-标记前列腺特异性膜抗原(68Ga-PSMA PET/CT)术前正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描对癌症前列腺分期的准确性,并与以手术标本组织病理学为金标准的磁共振成像(MRI)进行比较。材料与方法:对65例癌症前列腺癌患者进行回顾性分析。结果:68Ga-PSMA PET/CT对肿瘤的检测准确率为95%,MRI对肿瘤的诊断准确率为91%。68Ga PSMA PET/CT和MRI在病变定位方面没有差异。68Ga PSMA PET/CT检测前列腺外扩张的敏感性很低(14%)。68Ga-PSMA PET/CT对精囊浸润的检测灵敏度为57%,准确率为91%。最大标准化摄取值(SUVmax)与血清前列腺特异性抗原水平之间存在中度相关性(p<0.01;ρ=0.368),SUVmax与国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)分级之间存在中度相关(p<0.01,这可以改变疾病的分期和管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Preoperative evaluation of prostate cancer by <sup>68</sup>Ga-PMSA positron emission tomography/computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and with histopathological findings.

Preoperative evaluation of prostate cancer by <sup>68</sup>Ga-PMSA positron emission tomography/computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and with histopathological findings.

Preoperative evaluation of prostate cancer by 68Ga-PMSA positron emission tomography/computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and with histopathological findings.

Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of preoperative positron emission tomography/computed tomography with 68Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (68Ga-PSMA PET/CT) for staging prostate cancer and compare it with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using histopathology of surgical specimens as the gold standard.

Materials and methods: In this retrospective study, 65 patients with prostate cancer were analyzed.

Results: The accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for tumor detection was 95%, and that of MRI was 91%. There was no difference between 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and MRI regarding localization of the lesion. The sensitivity of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for detecting extraprostatic extension was quite low (14%). For detection of seminal vesicle invasion, 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT showed a sensitivity of 57% and accuracy of 91%. There was a moderate correlation between the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and the serum level of prostate-specific antigen (p < 0.01; ρ = 0.368) and between the SUVmax and the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade (p < 0.01; ρ = 0.513).

Conclusion: 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT is a promising tool for detecting and evaluating the primary tumor, which can alter the staging and management of the disease.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiologia Brasileira
Radiologia Brasileira Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
审稿时长
28 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信