Alexis V Smith, Elizabeth J Richardson, Rachel Cowan
{"title":"成人脊柱裂患者的疼痛干扰、疼痛类型和生活质量。","authors":"Alexis V Smith, Elizabeth J Richardson, Rachel Cowan","doi":"10.1002/pmrj.13084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Individuals with spina bifida (SB) experience nociceptive and neuropathic pain, and women with SB report more pain. However, the relationship between pain type and gender on pain interference and quality of life (QoL) among individuals with SB is less understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess relationships among pain interference, pain quality, participation-related QoL, and gender among adults with SB.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Fifty-one adults with SB completed a self-report survey assessing SB characteristics, pain severity, pain type, pain interference, and QoL.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Hospital outpatient adult SB clinic.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Measures of nociceptive pain quality, neuropathic pain quality, participation-related QoL, as well as pain interference with general activities, mood, and sleep were selected a priori as study measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-eight percent (N = 30) reported pain and more women than men reported pain (69% vs. 38%, p = .003). Higher general pain interference was associated with lower QoL (r = 0.444, p = .042), but not mood or sleep pain interference (both p's ≥ .451). There was no statistically significant difference in pain interference between genders (p = .138). Nociceptive pain was more common. Levels of nociceptive pain were positively associated with general pain interference, sleep pain interference, and mood pain inference. Neither pain type was associated with QoL (both p's > .082).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results from this study reveal key differences/similarities among four interrelated factors: pain, pain interference, QoL, and gender. Pertinent information gathered on pain type and QoL, like increased prevalence of nociceptive pain, can be utilized to formulate proactive and effective treatment plans for individuals with SB that may benefit their sleep pain interference and mood pain interference.</p>","PeriodicalId":20354,"journal":{"name":"PM&R","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pain interference, pain type, and quality of life among adults with spina bifida.\",\"authors\":\"Alexis V Smith, Elizabeth J Richardson, Rachel Cowan\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pmrj.13084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Individuals with spina bifida (SB) experience nociceptive and neuropathic pain, and women with SB report more pain. However, the relationship between pain type and gender on pain interference and quality of life (QoL) among individuals with SB is less understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess relationships among pain interference, pain quality, participation-related QoL, and gender among adults with SB.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Fifty-one adults with SB completed a self-report survey assessing SB characteristics, pain severity, pain type, pain interference, and QoL.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Hospital outpatient adult SB clinic.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Measures of nociceptive pain quality, neuropathic pain quality, participation-related QoL, as well as pain interference with general activities, mood, and sleep were selected a priori as study measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-eight percent (N = 30) reported pain and more women than men reported pain (69% vs. 38%, p = .003). Higher general pain interference was associated with lower QoL (r = 0.444, p = .042), but not mood or sleep pain interference (both p's ≥ .451). There was no statistically significant difference in pain interference between genders (p = .138). Nociceptive pain was more common. Levels of nociceptive pain were positively associated with general pain interference, sleep pain interference, and mood pain inference. Neither pain type was associated with QoL (both p's > .082).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results from this study reveal key differences/similarities among four interrelated factors: pain, pain interference, QoL, and gender. Pertinent information gathered on pain type and QoL, like increased prevalence of nociceptive pain, can be utilized to formulate proactive and effective treatment plans for individuals with SB that may benefit their sleep pain interference and mood pain interference.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PM&R\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PM&R\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13084\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PM&R","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13084","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pain interference, pain type, and quality of life among adults with spina bifida.
Introduction: Individuals with spina bifida (SB) experience nociceptive and neuropathic pain, and women with SB report more pain. However, the relationship between pain type and gender on pain interference and quality of life (QoL) among individuals with SB is less understood.
Objective: To assess relationships among pain interference, pain quality, participation-related QoL, and gender among adults with SB.
Design: Fifty-one adults with SB completed a self-report survey assessing SB characteristics, pain severity, pain type, pain interference, and QoL.
Setting: Hospital outpatient adult SB clinic.
Interventions: Not applicable.
Main outcome measures: Measures of nociceptive pain quality, neuropathic pain quality, participation-related QoL, as well as pain interference with general activities, mood, and sleep were selected a priori as study measures.
Results: Fifty-eight percent (N = 30) reported pain and more women than men reported pain (69% vs. 38%, p = .003). Higher general pain interference was associated with lower QoL (r = 0.444, p = .042), but not mood or sleep pain interference (both p's ≥ .451). There was no statistically significant difference in pain interference between genders (p = .138). Nociceptive pain was more common. Levels of nociceptive pain were positively associated with general pain interference, sleep pain interference, and mood pain inference. Neither pain type was associated with QoL (both p's > .082).
Conclusions: The results from this study reveal key differences/similarities among four interrelated factors: pain, pain interference, QoL, and gender. Pertinent information gathered on pain type and QoL, like increased prevalence of nociceptive pain, can be utilized to formulate proactive and effective treatment plans for individuals with SB that may benefit their sleep pain interference and mood pain interference.
期刊介绍:
Topics covered include acute and chronic musculoskeletal disorders and pain, neurologic conditions involving the central and peripheral nervous systems, rehabilitation of impairments associated with disabilities in adults and children, and neurophysiology and electrodiagnosis. PM&R emphasizes principles of injury, function, and rehabilitation, and is designed to be relevant to practitioners and researchers in a variety of medical and surgical specialties and rehabilitation disciplines including allied health.